------------------------------------------

Gishtakkar stopped and smelled the ground, paying attention to a broken stock of grass, hoping that fresh scent of an elk’s bone tail remained. He pressed his nose against the stem and inhaled only to find the smell of plant dust--dry and dead. Standing up on two legs, he was six and half feet tall with spots that bordered on black. He was much taller than the other three rockdogs, and unlike the others his ears were long, hanging half a claw below his muzzle. The dark hair on the tips of his ears had grown uncut during his 17 years, and he had braided it down to a fine knot capped with a blue feather.

His stomach growled, and scratching his muscled belly did not lessen the hunger.

Gishtakkar tried to remember the smell and taste of Taurok meat

Overall impression: I would read on. You've gotten me curious as to what these creatures are, what world they live in, and why the MC is estranged from his father's table. It gives just enough to raise many questions that I'd like to see answered.

That being said, "Gishtakkar" is a mouthful and starting with the name almost kept me from reading further. I had to read it several times to get a feel for how I might pronounce it, saying it over in my mind a couple times. It was rather like hitting a speed bump right out of the parking lot. Maybe he has a nick-name you could start with and introduce the full name at some other point?

Then I ran smack into "fresh scent of an elk’s bone tail remained" and stuttered, stopped, re-read. Never a good thing in the first couple of lines. It doesn't read smoothly and to me doesn't make sense. Did you mean an elk's tail bone? I wasn't sure what kind of scent this was supposed to be and the logic of an elk's tail reaching all the way to the grass left me scratching my head as I pictured the grass short (don't know why).

The rest of it read well and made up for the first couple of lines. But those are the ones that could have prevented me from moving on. The elk made even less sense to me when it became clear we weren't in a world where I would expect to find something as ordinary as an elk.

You’ve got something of interest here, however, I almost missed it. I suggest that you open your story with the following:

“When was the last time you tasted Taurok, Serbie?” (Whoa! - what's going on here?)

(Serbie responds with some kind of emotional statement / conflict statement).

Now that would make me (and many editors) curious. Then, you should lead into whatever the CONFLICT is in the story. Get the reader involved right from the git-go, got it?

Y’see, everything prior to the above dialogue is back-story or character description, which should come later rather in the opening. Get the conflict out in the open at the beginning. Now, I agree, there are other ways to open a novel, however, no matter what, you have to ‘grab’ the reader by his / her attention.

Have fun with your story – it has elements that suggest it might have lots of fun.

On the other hand, I think I'd rearrange the next two details, to get this: "Standing up on two legs, he was much taller than the other three rockdogs. Six and a half feet tall, with spots that bordered on black. (On what color fur? Big spots or little? Polka-dots or splotches? And is this detail also unique from the other dogs, or just a detail? I'm happy either way--I'm just curious. )
-rearranging them like that just brings the "rockdogs" image that much closer to the front, so I can add the spots and other details on top of my growing mental picture, instead of having to partially create the image and then completely alter it in the next sentence. If that makes sense to you. It's a very tiny detail, but I think it would flow ever-so-slightly better.

I also had several confused moments over the "elk's bone tail" thing. Could not for the life of me imagine what you meant, until I read your reply to Kathi. Maybe say the "elk's bony tail," or "long, bony tail," or even further--"an elk's bone tail, dragging long and snake-like through the grass . . ." something to make it obvious that you're talking about an unfamiliar world detail, rather than just making us wonder whether you really said what you meant.

Apart from those slight stumbles, I found the piece rather engaging. You planted me firmly in the scene and in Gishtakkar's head, gave me some very intriguing details to swallow, and I can tell some inkling of conflict is coming up before to long, which suits me fine. I did think the name was odd at first glance, but just as soon as you tell me he's a "rockdog," the name seems to fit perfectly, and gives me even more little inklings about this creature's culture/language/personality/whatever. I find the mix of familiar and strange, detail and tantalizing hint, very well done indeed, for a first 13. Props.

Oh, and I'm currently picturing your "rockdogs" as human-sized meercats with floppy ears. Dunno how close that is to the intended image, or whether it matters much at this point . . . just thought I'd share.

I found this interesting. He is a dog like animal but can braid his own hair--intriguing,

I wasn't confused about the elk's bone because I thought he was looking for something left over from a previous meal. But there wasn't even a tail bone to eat. Looks like I was wrong about that.

I think the first sentence is a little long but not as long as some so it could be okay. I've noticed that compound sentences are usually not good for the first couple in a story. You might try to get rid of the -ing words. Evidently they sound too passive, but I didn't see more than a couple so it might not be a huge problem.