posted
For me, the ultimate goal is to write novels. I've begun by trying to crank out a number of short stories, because they can be finished, learned from, and another started much more quickly.
What has happened with the first handful is that they tend to be small episodes that take place in an epic fantasy setting.
For example, I'm writing one now that is something of an origin story for a character who I imagine will feature prominently in a novel I write some day. Its not necessarily a "to be continued" type of thing, but when it ends, its clear that the character's adventures are just beginning.
What are everyone's thoughts on writing short stories that are clearly snippets of a larger narrative? Does this turn off editors? Do most markets look for more self-contained stories?
"Dracula's Guest was excised from the original Dracula manuscript by its publisher because of the length of the original book. It was published as a short story in 1914, two years after Stoker's death."
And Patrick Rothfuss won the WotF with The Road to Levenshir, which was part of The Name of the Wind.
[This message has been edited by InarticulateBabbler (edited September 25, 2008).]
posted
I have sold several stories featuring the same character (Yi Qin), who is intended to be the protagonist of several novels. Some of the stories are even, in effect, "novel extracts", reshaped to provide completion (i.e. lots of sub-plotty stuff taken out, or the ending modified to ensure closure).
So long as a short story is complete in and of itself, I don't think you should have a problem with this approach. Some editors won't know or care whether this is part of a "greater vision" of the writer. Others may be interested in serial characters, and tie-ins with possible novels. But if the story is satisfying, that's what really matters.
posted
"For me, the ultimate goal is to write novels. I've begun by trying to crank out a number of short stories, because they can be finished, learned from, and another started much more quickly."
This is exactly the strategy I'm following, for I would hate to invest the time it takes to write a novel only to discover that I can't adequately handle plot, action, character development or foreshadowing.
posted
I have a messy, over-written novel waiting to be re-written and I have tried to take bits out for short stories. The problem I hit is that a novel world is a lot more complex than a short story world. If I take out a lot of the background - religions, cultures, backstory, it feels like I'm not giving my story the depth it needs.
I think short stories can become novels, or pieces thereof, but vice versa is very hard.
I think you need to really narrow things down and definitely have a completion of some sort. You can't assume that the reader will ever see the sequel.
posted
It's interesting that this topic has come up when it has. I have one novella in the works that can easily expand into a novel from where I left it off. I'm also planning on sending the shorter version in to the WOTF contest once I finish polishing it. The thing is that my POV has to learn a lesson and meets with a bit of a nasty ending. I've also been thinking of taking the prologue of one of my novels and entering it in the WOTF competition, too. The thing is the protagonist also meets with a bad end.
So my question is (without trying to sound too much off topic) if I decided to use either of these as a novella or short story; Is it bad form for the POV or the protagonist to meet a bad end? I'm also interested in everyone's responses to the original question since I've already decided to go this route.
posted
Very much depends on the protagonist, and the method of POV. Generally, havign a first person POV gets the reader "closer" to a character and "And then I died" is rarely going to get you any favours with editor or readers. As with all things, it CAN be done, but it has be done very very well, and rarely is.
In general, the more likeable your MC is, and the more teh story centres around them as opposed to an ensemble cast, the harder time you'll have giving them a "bad end" and yet leaving your readers feeling they enjoyed the story.
posted
In the first story, the POV richly deserves what happens to him. The story leads up to this ending all the way through. And, no, I rarely ever use first person. Let's just say that the POV doesn't die .
The second story I mention that is a prologue could be a bit more sticky. The MC does die at the end. This is because the novel that this is from is not about her but her son who is born upon her death.
posted
> What are everyone's thoughts on writing short stories that > are clearly snippets of a larger narrative? Does this turn > off editors?
For a new writer, I think it almost certainly turns off editors. But the important words there are "clearly snippets." If you make sure the short story works well standing alone, then it no longer is clearly a snippet of a larger narrative.
> Do most markets look for more self-contained stories?
Yes. Basically, unless you are a well-known author writing a short story in one of your previously established fictional universes, each story needs to be able to stand completely on its own. And even if you are a well-known author writing a short story in one of your previously established fictional universes, markets probably still prefer it if the story can stand completely on its own.
Printer-friendly view of this topic
.
