posted
The best building in the world is useless if it doesn't serve the purpose it was designed for, so their excuses are just that..excuses.
If they KNOW if doesn't work well, and the the whole point of gaming is to control the characters in the game and have them do what you want when you want them to do it, how does deliberately positioning a button so that it is "less responsive" serve it's purpose?
I haven't used one, so I don't know how bad it is, but I know I don't like their attitude about it, and I don't blame the people who have returned them.
quote:Offering additional testimony praising the handheld, Kutaragi said, "I believe we made the most beautiful thing in the world. Nobody would criticize a renowned architect's blueprint that the position of a gate is wrong. It's the same as that."
Wow. Somebody really needs to get over themselves.
Posts: 2292 | Registered: Aug 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Goat: It's a matter of perspective. Consider this: You've made something better, portable, and smaller... And spent every working day on it for years.
Posts: 1132 | Registered: Jul 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
And now, after all those years you find that you made a mistake, a big one, so you have a press confrence telling everyone "I MEANT to do that! Really!".
posted
Except that space matters, it is a tiny device. I personally haven't played with one yet, but when I get one, I'll let you all know if it really causes any problems or not. ( I don't think it will.)
Posts: 1132 | Registered: Jul 2002
| IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
