posted
Thank you both for this information. The Hamdi case is indeed food for thought. I can't say that I agree that the decision goes as far as you say it does, but as a lay person discussing this with a third year law student, I am at a disadvantage. I conceed that you could be right.
And thanks for making me do my homework by looking up Hamdi v Rumsfeld. That was interesting reading too.
The best thing about BB discussions is that they can make people THINK. My compliments to you all. You have made me think. I like that.
Posts: 337 | Registered: Nov 2005
| IP: Logged |
In case I skimmed over this, I HATE the Hamdi decision. I think I lost at least one clerkship for being a little too vocal about my preference for the Scalia dissent.
Posts: 26071 | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged |