posted
It doesn't matter if its unsound, its pertinent. Note I didn't say I agreed with the point, but that it wasn't ad hominem. Its not ad hominem if its pertinent.
You have a hard time believing my explanation after Boxer's specific and explicit explanation that this applies to her too, and the repeated Democrat rhetoric to listen to the families of the troops? Furthermore, it has nothing in particular to do with Rice's childlessness, given Boxer's statements about it applying to her, too -- it would apply to Rice if she had children who were not affected by the war. Also, you're engaging in rather a lot of exaggeration and misdirection. I rather suspect that a lot of things about the war were discussed in the hearing; furthermore, you're bringing up the trope about this being an attack on Rice's childlessness again.
Posts: 15770 | Registered: Dec 2001
| IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic
