-----
It looked like the frame of an old bicycle, warped and mangled almost beyond recognition and half-buried in a think layer of snow. Maceo shifted his focus elsewhere. It hurt to keep his eyes open for longer than a few moments and his head throbbed as he tried to orient himself to his surroundings. A few abandoned, decrepit buildings littered the otherwise empty landscape, like dirty footprints marring the smooth finish of a fresh blanket of snow. There was no sign of life anywhere he could see. After sincere consideration, he decided that this was probably not the afterlife. If anything, this was a dream, a subliminal world he now found himself in, though he couldn’t recall quite how he had gotten here. When he tried to bring up the last thing he could remember, there were only fuzzy suggestions. And a faint name. Pia.
[This message has been edited by redapollo9 (edited July 30, 2010).]
As for the general waking cliche, I think this worked pretty well. I wasn't slapped in the face with the cliche, and in fact, I wonder if the guy's waking or asleep or what.
If this is actually a dream he's stuck in, I think that is a fantasy element separate from the opening dream cliche. Stories suffering from that issue usually have little to do with dreaming.
Nevertheless, it might be wise to open the story with the main character in a waking state so that an editor with a hair-trigger reject button (which is all of them, I think) won't mistake it for a cliche opening.
I found your style easy to read, but if you move (or tighten up)your descriptions, as others have suggested, I think you could fit a whole lot more hook into your 13 lines. (Says me as if I find it that easy)
I have been picked up in the past about starting sentences with, WHEN - something about putting the event before the subject. It might be useful to know that there are people out there that don't like it. I also stopped beginning sentences with IT because I discovered I was not clear enough on what IT was.
Have you finished this or plotted it out? I'd be happy to read more.
also, after 'subliminal world', this next part reads inconsistent. He thinks its a dream, then he wonders how he got here in the real world, so he knows it is no dream.
So be stingier with your words! If fewer words do what you need, use fewer words.
example:
He couldn’t recall how he'd gotten here, just confusion and..a name.
Pia.
One thing that bugs me is the reuse of the same key word or phrase in the same paragraph:
“...half-buried in a think (by now, you’ve no doubt seen this typo) layer of snow.”
“...of a fresh blanket of snow”
Either one of these usages of ‘snow’ as a description paints a nice visual, but using that same word in that capacity twice in the same paragraph causes it to lose its visual potency. It’s a personal nit of mine, to be sure, but I thought I’d offer it up for your consideration.
The ‘fuzzy suggestions’ description was a bit too vague for me. I would like to know what some of those suggestions are…they can still be fuzzy inside Maceo’s mind, but giving the reader something more to see could very well drum up more interest in Maceo’s situation.
S!
S!