“Philosophers don’t murder people,” the plump, pink philosopher said, with a smirk that must have made many an undergraduate want to murder him.
“Be that as it may,” I said. I consulted my notes. “You are Professor Drake.”
“Call me Horace, my dear boy.” Horace blushed, his delicate pink cheeks turning a brighter shade of rose. “Do forgive me. That was very politically incorrect wasn’t it, calling you ‘boy’.”
“I have a thick skin. Now, what can you tell me about the murder.”
“I hope you understand that no insult was intended. I’m so dreadfully sorry.” The man seemed terribly ill at ease.
You are trying too hard to force the reader to see exactly what you see instead of trying to evoke images in the reader's own mind.
quote:
“Philosophers don’t murder people,” the plump, pink philosopher said, with a smirk that must have made many an undergraduate want to murder him.(1)
“Be that as it may,” I said. I consulted my notes. “You are Professor Drake.”
“Call me Horace, my dear boy.” Horace blushed, his delicate pink cheeks turning a brighter shade of rose.(2) “Do forgive me. That was very politically incorrect wasn’t it, calling you ‘boy’.”
“I have a thick skin. Now, what can you tell me about the murder.”
“I hope you understand that no insult was intended. I’m so dreadfully sorry.” The man seemed terribly ill at ease.
1. I like this opener. But could it be more effective as two sentences? EG: "Philosophers don't murder people," the plump, pink philosopher said. He had a smirk that must have made many an undergraduate want to murder him.
2. The adjectives 'delicate' and 'rose' are clashing with his earlier description of 'plump' in my head. Delicate and rose make me think of small, petite things, but he's round. It also makes me think he's a little bit effeminate. But mostly, having both delicate and rose in the same sentence right there makes a dainty feel that doesn't mix well with the rest of the prose style (the perspective character's bluntness), for me.
Other than those two things that leaped out at me, I have no qualms with this.
Nice start. Good luck. :)
That's about it for me. Technically it's pretty strong. I'm not terribly excited about this piece, so you'd have to turn my crank a whole lot to get me to read more than a few pages. Then again, that might just be the way Professor Drake is presented - he doesn't seem particularly appealing or interesting to me, and the MC is nearly a disembodied voice which isn't doing anything for me either.
Jayson Merryfield
Being a grad student I've encountered and probably given the same look. Its the conciet of the ivory tower to be arrogant jerks about their "special" status.
I'd phrase it somethig like
his patronizing tone accented by a condescending smile that had undoubtedly left many students pondering the grounds for justifiable homicide.
So I think my suggestion is to just play with the "ill at ease" concept and figure out how to work it into either the action (he shuffled in his seat, fidgeted with one of the heavy gold rings on his fingers, offered me a twinkie, etc.) or work it into dialogue, or just move this line further down where it would seem appropriate to draw this kind of conclusion.
Thinking more about this, if the MC/narrator is a detective, he'd probably observe the "terribly ill at ease" in a much more clinical fashion. Something like "I noted that the subject seemed nervous and ill at ease."
hope this helps!
“Philosophers don’t murder people,” the plump, pink philosopher said, with a smirk that must have (TAKE OUT MUST HAVE - NO DOUBT ABOUT THE FACT THAT STUDENTS WOULD HAVE HATED HIM) made many an undergraduate want to murder him.
“Be that as it may,” I said. I consulted my notes. “You are Professor Drake.”
“Call me Horace, my dear boy.” Horace blushed, his delicate pink cheeks turning a brighter shade of rose. “Do forgive me. That was very politically incorrect wasn’t it, calling you ‘boy’.”
“I have a thick skin. Now, what can you tell me about the murder. (QUESTION MARK HERE INSTEAD OF PERIOD - HE'S ASKING)”
“I hope you understand that no insult was intended. I’m so dreadfully sorry.” The man seemed (WAS- DON'T NEED TO QUALIFY, HE EITHER WAS OR WASN'T) terribly ill at ease. (HE SAID WITH SUCH STUDIED INSINCERITY/HIPOCRACY THAT i WAS HOPING HE WAS GUILTY JUST FOR THE PLEASURE OF TAKING HIM DOWN??)
[This message has been edited by debhoag (edited June 23, 2007).]
I put in the "he seemed ill at ease" after feedback to the effect that readers don't always pick up on body language. But I'll have the guy squirm in his chair, instead.
I'm 2/3 of the way through the story, now, and a little down on it. It seems to work fairly well, but doesn't really seem exciting enough, and I'm not sure how to raise the ante. Maybe make the POV character have some crisis in his own life, instead of just trying to solve the crime. If I could somehow make his crisis the same as the professor's crisis, only upside down somehow. Hah! I'm off and running.