"How to go for a Walk"
Sure, going for a walk is easy. We’ve been doing it since we’ve been two; it’s one of those events that has Daddy rushing for that new digital camera he bought so that he could record moments just like this. We don’t think much of it; we walk from one place to the next, from sputtering copy machine to bitchy boss, and to rack up those points on the pedometer in some vain yet lazy attempt to look like Tom Cruise or Angelina Jolie. In fact we’ve become so proficient in it that we don’t give it a second thought. People have forgotten that walking is an art form. We just need to open our eyes and see the art that’s there.
So we begin with the proper attire. Whatever stained T-shirt and hole-patched pair of jeans you’re wearing now will do just fine. It’s not like anybody else will care or even bother to do better themselves; as you’ll see, you’ll just be blending in.
I was more interested in Daddy with the digital camera than in the office stuff.
I think instead of the generic "we's", I'd try to focus on one person- "I". Give us a "character" to care about and relate to.
Also, as the mother of 4 young ones, children usually walk between nine months and 1 1/2 years. Two years would be very late for Daddy going for the camera.
I'm not sure you need the office or Tom Cruise lines. Maybe just go onto step one.
Just my thoughts. I hope this wasn't an unpleasant experience for you.
If it doesn't... erm...
"Sure, walking is easy. We’ve been doing it since we were two, when we sent Daddy rushing for that new digital camera. We don’t think much of it; we walk from sputtering copy machine to bitchy boss, racking up pedometer points so we can look like movie stars. In fact we’ve become so proficient that we've forgotten that walking is an art.
Begin with the proper attire. Whatever you’re wearing now will do just fine. You’ll just be blending in."
because:
1. we haven't been "going for walks" since we were two, we've only been walking
2. the first steps are monumentally important for parents, and if dad has a new digital camera, we can presume he bought it for precisely these occasions.
3. while copying machines and bosses are familiar experiences to quite a few of us, angelina jolie and tom cruise are too specific (and too time-defined) to work in a piece about something everyone does.
4. we've already said we don't think much about it, so why mention that phrase again?
5. a form of art is art. art only comes in forms.
6. once you tell us it's art, we're either going to follow you or not, there's little good to tell us to open our eyes to it.
7. since we're moving into second-person, you can start with a good declaritive sentence.
8. if i don't happen to be wearing a t-shirt and jeans, you're unnecesarily implying i'm excluded, when you seem to want to be inviting.
9. if i'm blending in no matter what i wear, it can only possibly be because everyone else is doing pretty much the same.
10. if i'm just blending in, i will see it whether or not you tell me to.
I've done this elsewhere, but i'll explain it here: i'm not telling you how to write your story. i'm telling you how i would do it, and why, because in the end i think that's what critiquing boils down to. i invite others to do the same when i post.
free advice: in a story starting like this? we'd better get something like "I walk a lot" pretty soon :P
[This message has been edited by englshmjr18 (edited September 22, 2006).]
And englshmjr18, I'm confused by what you're doing - are you trying to rewrite my story for me?
And no offense, but your rewrite/revision of my story was not appreciated.
Sometimes writers ask for examples of what critiquers mean when they give feedback, but sometimes they just want to know if people would want to keep reading. (They might also want to know why people wouldn't want to keep reading, but then, again, they might not.)
This is why we ask people to include information about what they are looking for in feedback along with their first 13 lines and along with the information about the rest of the story (length, genre, etc).
Certainly no one here - englshmjr18 or otherwise - presumes to actually rewrite someone else's story. I use rewrites in critiques when I feel that it will clarify what my comments mean. It is only for the purpose of providing clear and helpful feedback.
Since that is what rewrite examples mean, you are essentially telling us that you want our feedback but you don't want it in the way we feel would most clearly explain what we are trying to say.
We wouldn't presume to tell you how to write your story, yet you presume to tell us how to explain our feedback? Talk about looking a gift horse in the mouth.
Not only that, but you rudely reject feedback offered in goodwill. We give feedback essentially out of the goodness of our hearts to help fellow writers, and for no compensation. No one expects you to agree with every piece of feedback, but at least show some gratitude.
You can be sure not to receive rewrites - or any other feedback - from me in the future, since I prefer to offer my limited time to people who appreciate it.
The next thing I have to say is aimed squarely at sojoyful, and is not as amiable. I'll just get to the point - sojoyful, ever since I first started reading your comments, I've never been fond of you. Frankly, if this were a less formal message board, I'd be less careful with my word choice (your imagination is accurate enough to fill in what I really wish to say here). The only other thing I wish to say is that I deeply regret that these boards do not have an "ignore user" feature, and that needless to say that as far as I'm concerned, you or your comments are not appreciated. At all.
Noted. Good luck anyway. (<-- not sarcasm)
EDIT: I took your coment seriously. When I screw up, I honestly want to fix it, so I've been looking for my error. Looking back at comments I've made in F&F (and noting that I only gave feedback in one of your threads), I don't see how my feedback differs from anyone else's. If it does, I need you to tell me specifically how and why, so that I don't make the same mistakes again. If it doesn't, then I need some other explanation for this negativity. I don't want to be unwittingly giving offense when it could be corrected. I think that's probably true of everyone here.
[This message has been edited by sojoyful (edited September 27, 2006).]
Something to keep in mind, a rewrite like that only shows you what they THINK the story is about, if theirs doesn't match yours then you have a disconnect and you need to find a way to make their mental picture match theirs. Just some friendly advice, one writer to another.