[This message has been edited by TL 601 (edited December 15, 2005).]
I want to know why she's so prone to crying, and how little Colding is going to help her.
Which is probably not what the story is about, but I would keep reading...
* It disturbs me; I don't like it
* It disturbs me, which makes it powerful
So I wouldn't want to read it, but I recognize its power and suspect others will love it.
If I did read it, all I'd care about was Colding's bizarre way of thinking about his mother. Does he love her? Is he just viewing her as he would a movie? If it were about anything else, I'd be disappointed: this will overpower anything else, for me.
My biggest problem I see is the disjointedness of it all. I know that may have been the effect you were going for, but it seriously threw me off. First was the name of "Colding" because for some reason I thought of it as an adverb and had to read the sentence multiple times to figure out it was his name.
Why is she calling him her "little genius" was it because he handed her his grades, or was it the cause of something else. I think if the story started a little earlier, explaining what caused her to say what she did and start to cry, I would be a bit more inclined to read on. Even if at the time I didn't totally understand what the motives were behind the crying. As it is, however, I find myself in a stupor knowing the Who, but not the How, Where, or Why.
The name "Colding" threw me off as well. Maybe if you gave his full name at the beginning or something, it wouldn't be so confusing.
The first 13 need to be interesting, either by describing something unusual, making a shocking statement, painting an intriguing picture, or (must be handled carefully) thrusting the character into a dangerous situation.
Here, you have the ideas with potential to make a good hook, but you don;t follow through. Instead, you thrust me into dialog in what looks like an attempt at an emotional scene, except I have no attachment to any of the characters yet.
The main problem with the dialog, to me, is that you haven't established any point of view. It reads very cinematic, and I'm not sure yet where I should focus my attention.
I love the first line: "Colding thought of his mother in parts." That was my hook. And this makes Colding more loveable--he cares about his mom.
Do you need readers for the rewrite yet? Let me know, I'm interested to see what you've done with the character.
I agree on the name. It threw me off as well. It is his real name? Is it a nickname, and if so, how did he earn it?
The first sentence simultaneously hooked me and confused me. It hooked me after the second reading, when I realized what it said. But the first time through, the juxtaposition of words made it read as "Colding thought of his mother's parts," and that sounded dirty.
quote:
Her legs blocking his view of the television.
I don't get that sentence at all. I'm trying to picture how her legs could blog his view, and I can't. Also, this image does not flow nearly as well as all the other images in that paragraph.
I don't like "cartoon eyes" because it pulls me out of the story while my brain has to go look up some cartoon eyes in its memory banks, decide how big they are, and then make a comparison. The image bumped me out of the moment.
I agree on "my little genius." It needs to be qualified. At least say she's talking about him. Or have the last image in the preceding paragraph be the one about the grades, so that there is a logical connection.
All in all, I want to read more. I want to know what's up with this kid!
her watery blue eyes were bigger than cartoon eyes.
You said eyes twice. That is very jarring to read, to me... there's gotta be a better way to say that. I like the metaphor... or whatever it is... it's good.
-leaf
[This message has been edited by Leaf II (edited November 21, 2005).]
I'd keep reading. Can't really take on crits right now though.
[This message has been edited by apeiron (edited November 21, 2005).]