I would also warn against telling the editor up front that your story has no beginning, no end, and no particular reason to start anywhere. He may believe you!
I love coffee and South American locales, and an Argentine coffee shop is a fascinating place, to be sure; but unless it's a sentient building I think there needs to be a main character -- even if he or she is only mentioned in the first sentence:
"Eduardo Mallea, occupying his usual chair in the corner, takes in the hardwood floors, the gleaming silver, the pervasive, heady scent of freshly-ground expresso and thinks to himself, Coffee shops are a microcosm of the world. Take this one, for example...."
Best,
Varishta
[This message has been edited by Varishta (edited August 19, 2005).]
Are you looking for readers of the whole thing?
How long is it?
I'm actually going to (for the most part) disagree with what's been said above. I don't have much problem with it at all. The language is quite nice, and that alone gives me enough pleasure in reading that I'd be willing to accept a slower beginning than some readers might want. (Though wbriggs MAY have a point about miscuing an editor. ) The place is interesting, the possibility of a story is intriguing me. I want to read on to find out what comes of this--but something more interesting SHOULD happen soon.
And there IS a main character--your narrator. I'm gleaning a lot about him from his voice, the way he goes about telling the story.
The only exception I might have is the parentheses. The first set I don't think you need at all. Just break up the sentence into two. Three maybe. The second set were simply annoying. Choose one. American or South American? Which one would put the proper mental image into your reader's mind?
The main character in this story is a portrait - and the action happens around it. It's certainly unconventional - perhaps that makes it unfit for sale.
I'm really OK with that. I want to sell lots of stories and novels, but I'll be OK if I never sell this particular one. So if I can make it better, I certainly want to do so. If saleable isn't necessarily better, then I don't care that much about selling it. Does that make sense?
I'm *very* pleased with the honest feedback on these lines. I'm going to take out the cutesy wutesy and the errant parentheses as you've suggested, then I'll send the whole thing on to whoever wants to read it.
A portrait's POV, huh?
Hmm....
Can't wait to see what you do with it.
Best,
Varishta
NITPICK: Shouldn't it be "a story that doesn't have . . ."? I'd normally put it down to author's license, but the tone of the sentence is already heavy, what with "is not . . . auspicious" so a less formal-sounding word might balance well. I also dislike the repitition of "might as well." Now, with that out of the way . . .
Even without knowing that the main character is a portrait, I'm okay with a beginning that focuses on the cafetería because you give the impression that the place is important. This place is, after alll, the beginning of the story that has no beginning.
The extra parentheses and writing out "slash" is interesting. I found that, along with the word "syncretism" and the following details, they actually gave the additional connotation/implication that the European aspects were being "slashed," or falsified, by the South American aspects, and the separation of "American" and "(South American)" made the reference to class divisions clearer: the effects of modern industry putting the lie to an appearance of Victorian elegance. The only problem is that it took me some thinking and the use of a dictionary to arrive at this fairly far-fetched impresssion. If you want the writing to flow, ignore everything I just said.