---->
“Crispin?”
Crispin looked over at Myanth. “Yes?”
“Are we going to go in?”
Crispin thought a few moments. Visions of drooling creatures with large teeth danced through his imagination. He shivered.
“What’s wrong?”
“Nothing.” Crispin replied, a little too quickly. “Just a little chilly here is all.”
Here happened to be halfway up a sheer cliff at the mouth of a gigantic cave. After a short pause he added, “I guess we can camp here for the night and proceed into the cavern tomorrow. I don’t look forward to leaving the sky behind.”
---->
I have about a full .doc page done. Let me know if you would like to read it via post or e-mail please.
quote:
"Nothing.” Crispin replied, a little too quickly. “Just a little chilly here is all.”
I think this would read better without the comma after 'replied.'
quote:
“I guess we can camp here for the night and proceed into the cavern tomorrow. I don’t look forward to leaving the sky behind.”
I think you should borrow a word from spelunking instead of saying 'proceed' in this sentence, or just some how make it sound a bit more casual, or even authoritarian if the speaker is indeed in a position of authority. I don't want to recommend the words, that is your choice, but here are some spelunking terminology links that might be useful.
http://werple.net.au/~gah/speleology/glossary.htm
http://home.mira.net/~gnb/caving/glossary/]http://home.mira.net/~gnb/caving/glossary/
http://wasg.iinet.net.au/terminol.html
Edited to fix garbled thinking and writing (and then mangled links .)
[This message has been edited by PE_Sharp (edited February 17, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by PE_Sharp (edited February 17, 2004).]
That really jarred me.
I liked the part with the visions.
You have good sentence structure, overall, combining short with long.
Just a few quick comments:
<“Are we going to go in?”> might flow better as "Are we going in?"
<leaving the sky behind> is a nice way to put that.