quote:
If you think Frodo should give the ring to Smeagle turn to page 91. If you think Frodo should tell Smeagle to get out of his face and go jump into the lava turn to page 62
...this way you can put all 17 endings into one story!
[This message has been edited by snapper (edited April 03, 2010).]
I found an ending now and I think it fits the best.
[This message has been edited by satate (edited April 03, 2010).]
Someone with lots of writing experience could probably offer useful suggestions.
However, I'm just an armchair literary theorist.
It seems a lot of gifted writers are pantsers. (Others are more so plan-aheaders -- but both camps end up achieving similar goals, in the end, right? That is, writers approach plotting either by the seat of their pants or planning it out ahead of time.)
At my side is this library book about a system for a beginner to HYPERLY plan out a novel; it's by Evan Marshall -- __ THE MARSHALL PLAN WORKBOOK: WRITING YOUR NOVEL FROM START TO FINISH __. Marshall says in essense **figure out what the lead's quest is and then plot toward its being achieved.** His book's actual, accompanying worksheet for this:
###
The genre of the novel I am creating is_____________________________
The lead is a ... _____________________________
CRISIS CHECKLIST:
__ - Appropriate for target genre?
__ - Interesting to you?
__ - Interesting to readers, in your best judgment?
__ - Fresh and original, to the best of your knowledge?
In response to the crisis, my lead decides to__________
_______
_______
_______
GOAL CHECKLIST:
__ - Most logical under the circumstances?
__ - Believable that achievement of this goal will solve the crisis?
__ - Will cause lead to try to gain possession or relief?
__ - If lead fails, he/she will suffer terrible consequences?
__ - Life without achieving this goal and solving the crisis would be unthinkable?
__ - Worthy, high-minded motivation?
__ - Pits lead against great odds?
###
Hmm. Wow. A satisfying ending apparently must really bring closure to a story's underlying conflicts in some way, h'em? Somehow. And, to paraphrase the eleven points of Marshall's two-part checklist, such a climax must (1) fit with whatever is the genre (2) appeal to the author (3) be thought likely to appeal to readers (4) be thought to be "fresh and original" (5) be organic/realistic/"logical" (6) satisfy underlying conflicts (7) have the story's protag(s) be thought to have "gain[ed] possession or relief" of something or another (8) be such that "terrible consequences" must result otherwise (9) be such that life without it is "unthinkable" (10) result -- that is, unless the hero is an ANTI-hero -- from motivations that are "high-minded," and (11) be something that overcomes "great odds."
Phew!
* * *
However, when I was at the library, I skimmed and sped-read __ THE PLOT THICKENS: EIGHT WAYS TO BRING FICTION TO LIFE __ by Noah Lukeman, who is a fairly "literary" of a fiction-writing guru. Lukeman's book's appendix contains this alphabetized list of nine recommended books on writing, which runs like this.
Bly, Carol's __ BEYOND THE WRITER'S WORKSHOP __
OSC's (...well, duh!) __ CHARACTERS & VIEWPOINT __
Frey, James N.'s __ HOW TO WRITE A DAMN GOOD NOVEL __ and __ THE KEY: HOW TO WRITE DAMN GOOD FICTION USING THE POWER OF MYTH __
Kress, Nancy's __ DYNAMIC CHARACTERS __
Naylor, Phyllis Reynold's __ THE CRAFT OF WRITING THE NOVEL __
Seger, Linda's __ CREATING UNFORGETABLE CHARACTERS __
Sloane, William's __ THE CRAFT OF WRITING __
Tobias, Ronald's __ 20 MASTER PLOTS __
. . . . . "Aha!" I noted to myself, "Kress is said to be a HUGE pantser! Maybe SHE knows what to do or can give advice/help brainstorm how to grab up plot threads into a reasonably satisfying ending!"
I just now went and used Amazon's "Look inside!" feature to glance at the introduction to Kress's __ BEGINNINGS, MIDDLES AND ENDS: HOW TO GET YOUR STORIES OFF TO A ROARING START, KEEP THEM TIGHT AND CRISP THROUGHOUT, AND END THEM WITH A WALLOP -- (a title, incidentally, that it seems quite a few readers swear by, on such forums as Amazon and Good Reads http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/68317.Beginnings_Middles_Ends ). And, I read (quote):
###
[...] Finally there is the story that sustains interest right to the last scene. The reader is racing along, dying to know how it all comes out or what it all means. But she never does. Instead she finds a resolution that leaves major plot lines hanging or is out of character or doesn't seem to add up to anything meaningful, or trails off into pseudosymbolism that doesn't seem connected to events of the story. [...] Many such stories receive requests for an editorial rewrite, since the editor doesn't want to believe that such promising fireworks fizzle out. The request spotlights the problem but doesn't solve it.
###
"Hmm...." Now I gotta read Kress's book!"
[This message has been edited by WraithOfBlake (edited April 07, 2010).]
This is a point where you could examine your premise and put it to good use as an editing tool if you are so inclined. First, if you haven't thought about the story's premise, just figuring that out should reduce the list of possible endings. There are three basic types of endings: protagonist succedes, protagonist fails, protagonist has mixed success/failure. The premise should at least steer you to one of those outcomes. Then if you take the premise and tighten the story around it, perhaps additional candidate endings can be discarded.
If you still have several options, try to determine which would be preceeded by the highest level of dramatic tension and result in the most satisfying resolution.
She says she tends to writes many drafts, often putting her stuff down and returning to it later with fresh eyes. In any case, the following anecdote sort of encapsulates her section on "Ends" in her writing "how-to" book, I think. She had written this particular short story, she says, but nobody would publish it. Years later, she took it back out, re-examed it and somewhat recast the whole thing, giving it a more satisfying ending. (Which, in general, as she has explained, is to "fulfill the promises" made in the opening of a story and to bring successes and failures to the various threads of conflict within the story's middle. Or something like that.) The story was published and won awards.