Of course, short stories are a good way to break in the trade of writing. That is why I have been trying to write short stories for some time.
The general rule of short stories: lose everything that is not vital to the story. What I did was lose the text between the individual scenes, the text that glues them together. Only now the story appears very fragmented, jumping from scene to the next.
I need advice. Is this fragmented form acceptable in the short stories market or do I need to glue the scenes together after all?
[This message has been edited by MartinV (edited February 23, 2010).]
Think of a SS as a scene in a movie with a beginning, middle, and end. For example, the King of Rohan scene in LoTR.
Or consider it to be the one major event that happens in that character's life. His is not a grand adventure, but about that time he stopped the aliens from taking over a 7-11.
Here's a whacky idea. Read "The Giving Tree" by Shel Silverstein.
My personal favorite SS are ones that cover a lot of time. Give me the highlights of a great eon-spanning adventure. =)
Axe
And no, you don't need the text between the scenes but the scenes must have something significant happen in them. You should be stringing together, like beads, the events that are significant to tell the story. It's nice if scenes can both further the plot and develop character but sometimes they mostly exist to do one or the other.
That said, my short answer is:
If it feels wrong to you, there's a good chance that it is wrong. Try reading it out loud and see how it flows.
Me, I work at novel length but I also write short stories because I'm terrible at endings. Working at the novelette length (which is where all my "short" stories seem to end up) has given me practice coming up with an overall story arc and tying up all the loose ends. It's helped my writing immeasurably. But I was doing it for the story-crafting, not because I needed them to break into publishing.
Back to your original question, though: I find that some of my ideas are more suited to short-story length than novel length and vice versa (sp?). I write the story to the length it demands, not to the length the market demands (though I will fight a story down a few hundred words if I'm close to a market's word limit). If you're having trouble writing "short" stuff then the problem might be that your ideas are too big for the length you're aiming for.
You might want to try reading an anthology of short stories and summarizing each story in a sentence or two - capture the essence of the plot and situation. Then if you do the same thing with your own stories, you should have an easier time keeping a tight focus on your plot (and thus keeping your word count down).
quote:
What I did was lose the text between the individual scenes, the text that glues them together. Only now the story appears very fragmented, jumping from scene to the next.
I second what others have said - read plenty of short stories (and novels, for that matter), originally published in English. English writing convention will likely differ from other European languages; if your goal is English publication then familiarity - which you'll gain more from reading the work than reading about the work - probably should be a priority.
This in turn should give you examples of how and when writers use scene breaks, and how writers who don't use them still manage to achieve the same effect. A long time ago I stumbled upon this website which also had some good information about how to structure the story within the scenes, and I found it rather helpful on this subject.
BenM, I have already seen the webpage you provided. I have used the structure advised there when planning a rewrite of my WOTF novellette. The problem is now I see three different ways to begin the story and I must still provide the necessary info for it to work.
[This message has been edited by MartinV (edited February 24, 2010).]
BenM, thank you for the information about an alternative book source for people outside the US. What a great help that should be.