This one I first read maybe eight years ago, but it's one of my favorites. It does everything I think a short story should do, but it doesn't have a character arc, consisting of nothing more than a moment. And it's short.
Bullet in the Brain by Tobias Wolff
More than thirty years later, I can do it---I do do it---but publication still hasn't happened.
Sturgeon's Law orignated as "Nothing is ever absolutely so." By 1951 it had become "Ninety percent of science fiction is crud, but then, ninety percent of everything is crud." [Wikipedia: Theodore Sturgeon.]
rich, I'm curious, when you say, "It does everything I think a short story should do," what do you mean? What is it you think a short story should do (not being confrontational here, I'm genuinely curious about your opinion)?
[This message has been edited by annepin (edited January 10, 2009).]
And ... blanking on her name, but the Lottery (about the process of picking a person from the village each year who is then stoned to death.) We read that young in grade school and it made a big impression.
Those are amongst a long list of favorite and inspirational stories, for me. I love the short story, as an art form.
But maybe I can take Bullet in the Brain as a way of explaining why THIS particular short story struck me in such a way.
Short stories should be read in one sitting (thank you, Mr. Poe), and this one does it admirably. Four pages and it's complete.
The best short stories linger. "They is" has stuck with me, and it's stuck with me precisely because it is a memory forgotten. The setup to this is what the character does not remember, but we're told what he doesn't remember. Told with economy and sharpness because these are the memories that we have as readers.
This short story cannot be told as a novel or novella. A novel about this guy's life would be boring, and it's something we've seen from an Updike or an Oates before so this is the only way this guy's story could've been told without it relying too heavily on cliche or banality.
This short story is something I wish I would've been able to write.
And finally...
"Damned unfair,” he said. “Tragic, really. If they’re not
chopping off the wrong leg, or bombing your ancestral village, they’re closing their positions."
"She looked at him with drowning eyes."
"He did not remember the pleasure of giving respect."
"They is, they is, they is."
This one is what I think all short stories should do. Kinda lame, I know, as far as explanations go, but that's all I got.
So if it speaks to you, then, yeah, it does what a short story is supposed to do.
And that's probably even lamer than what I said in the previous post. I'll shut up now 'cause the next thing you know I'll be saying crap like, "Life is like a box of chocolates."
[This message has been edited by kathyton (edited January 10, 2009).]
I'd do it myself but I tend to wander...
One of the things I've been told about short stories is that unity is very important. And not unity as in being united, but unity as in units or ones. One time period, one character, one problem, one epiphany, one crucial thing that changes the character (and thereby the reader).
I've been told that a short story should be about the single (there's that "one" again) most tramatic thing that happens to the character in his or her entire life, THE turning point, the defining incident.
So that's one (heh) thing to consider.
One direction of reversal, from bad to good fortune or vice versa. I prefer from bad to good, but I enjoy tragically beautiful stories.
One chain of causation, one train of thought, one recognition causing decision and change, a single-minded purpose for the protagonist.
One relevant fanatastical imaginative premise, one dramatic premise, one emotional premise, all the premises relevant to each other.
One culminating moment.
One meaning. One message. One outcome. One plot.
[This message has been edited by extrinsic (edited January 11, 2009).]
"Nightfall" showed me, with one simple concept, that astro-physics could be used in SF to cause the evolution of a radically different culture.
Asimov's robot stories were always about one logical conundrum.
"The Roads must Roll" was perhaps the first story I read which indicated that life in the future might be messier than my idealistic young mind hoped for.
"By his Bootstraps" was the first time paradox story I ever read, which showed me that one could speculate about improbable physics in SF--and entertain.
I liked "Who can replace a Man?" because it suggested that AI would never take over the world, something I think I still believe.
"Bears Discover Fire" was a recent discovery for me, entertaining because the basic premise makes no sense, yet we buy it for no more reason than that it's amusing, perhaps reminiscent of a kid's story, and the character observation is wonderful.
The "Callahan's Place" stories are generally about one character who drops in to the bar and tells his or her story to the regulars. For me the bar's anarchic, punning atmosphere lingers more than the stories they tell.
But there were two that stood out to me over the years. One was already mentioned, The Lottery by Shirley Jackson.
The other I don't remember the name of, but it was a Christmas Story where a man who was a woodworker or something sold all his tools to buy his wife some fancy combs for her hair, and she cut her hair and sold it to buy something for his woodworking, maybe some fancy wood or the like. Wish I knew the name of it so I could find it to read it again.
As to other shorts that I liked -- Clarke's THE STAR and his TALES FROM THE WHITE HART. I don't know. I really am a novelist at heart for both reading and writing.