What has happened with the first handful is that they tend to be small episodes that take place in an epic fantasy setting.
For example, I'm writing one now that is something of an origin story for a character who I imagine will feature prominently in a novel I write some day. Its not necessarily a "to be continued" type of thing, but when it ends, its clear that the character's adventures are just beginning.
What are everyone's thoughts on writing short stories that are clearly snippets of a larger narrative? Does this turn off editors? Do most markets look for more self-contained stories?
"Dracula's Guest was excised from the original Dracula manuscript by its publisher because of the length of the original book. It was published as a short story in 1914, two years after Stoker's death."
And Patrick Rothfuss won the WotF with The Road to Levenshir, which was part of The Name of the Wind.
[This message has been edited by InarticulateBabbler (edited September 25, 2008).]
So long as a short story is complete in and of itself, I don't think you should have a problem with this approach. Some editors won't know or care whether this is part of a "greater vision" of the writer. Others may be interested in serial characters, and tie-ins with possible novels. But if the story is satisfying, that's what really matters.
This is exactly the strategy I'm following, for I would hate to invest the time it takes to write a novel only to discover that I can't adequately handle plot, action, character development or foreshadowing.
Cheers,
Pat
I think short stories can become novels, or pieces thereof, but vice versa is very hard.
I think you need to really narrow things down and definitely have a completion of some sort. You can't assume that the reader will ever see the sequel.
So my question is (without trying to sound too much off topic) if I decided to use either of these as a novella or short story; Is it bad form for the POV or the protagonist to meet a bad end? I'm also interested in everyone's responses to the original question since I've already decided to go this route.
In general, the more likeable your MC is, and the more teh story centres around them as opposed to an ensemble cast, the harder time you'll have giving them a "bad end" and yet leaving your readers feeling they enjoyed the story.
The second story I mention that is a prologue could be a bit more sticky. The MC does die at the end. This is because the novel that this is from is not about her but her son who is born upon her death.
For a new writer, I think it almost certainly turns off editors. But the important words there are "clearly snippets." If you make sure the short story works well standing alone, then it no longer is clearly a snippet of a larger narrative.
> Do most markets look for more self-contained stories?
Yes. Basically, unless you are a well-known author writing a short story in one of your previously established fictional universes, each story needs to be able to stand completely on its own. And even if you are a well-known author writing a short story in one of your previously established fictional universes, markets probably still prefer it if the story can stand completely on its own.