"I really hate tacos," John said. "Just kidding!"
That's how I would format it. But is it better if it is as follows,
"I really hate tacos," said John. "Just kidding!"
Thoughts? Comments?
But few writers do it this way. I can't speak for their motivations 'cause I've never heard any. I've wondered if I'm doing it right. But I can't say I'm doing it wrong, either.
Said John -- sounds more final. Like it is the end of John's speech. It can be followed by John's actions or even his thoughts, but not another word, not immediately.
"I've figured it all out," said John. He leaned over the bar and leered into Joan's face. "What're you going to do now? Run?"
compared to
"I've figured it all out," John said. He leaned over the bar and leered into Joan's face. "What're you going to do now? Run?"
seems the latter is not quite right. Just a touch off -- for my taste.
whereas
"I've figured it all out, John said. "What're you going to do now? Run?" He leaned over the bar and leered into Joan's face.
works better -- for my artistic sense.
They are so close to invisible, I wouldn't worry about it much though.
Jane said when
"I think we are being followed," Jane said, looking over her shoulder.
when there is an action following.
in all other instances I use " said Jane.
I mix the people doing something with what they are talking, though in actual practice, some of the action need not be there.
"I really hate tacos," [bold]John counted out a couple twenties.[/bold] "Just kidding!" and then ordered two dozen.
I've figured it all out," [bold]John leaned over the bar and leered into Joan's face.[/bold] "What're you going to do now? Run?"
I will use said at times, but usually will have the person talking also doing something. If I plan ahead, what they are doing advances the story rather than just show who's talking. I usually don't plan ahead, though.....
Bent Tree's example might be more appropriately written as: "'I think we are being followed.' Jane looked over her shoulder." This without the "said."
But, mostly, I agree that nobody pays any attention to either one. Don't worry about it.
"I'm not sure about action tags." John frowned.
"I always use them." Jane nodded.
Sean shrugged. "They're much better than those old-fashioned dialogue tags."
John had to nod in agreement. "You're right. Only fuddy-duddies use those things."
Arrrghh. Make them be still and stop bobbling.
[This message has been edited by JeanneT (edited March 19, 2008).]
"So often?"
"Yes."
"Yes, what?"
"It can become confusing who is talking."
They both nodded sagely.
"Adverbs are bad, too," he said sternly.
[This message has been edited by skadder (edited March 19, 2008).]
Action tags rock, but, like JeanneT said, (or would it be said JeanneT j/k) they can be overused and become annoying.
Another thing I do is over-tag, I think I tag almost every single line, and I stuff tags in to add pauses, which, works all right but I should definitely trim it down.
I have found that as I go, I am doing better at automatically writing less from my bad habit list, but it's freeing to write withtout worrying about that list too. I strongly recommend it.
Good luck, she said with a smile.
quote:
Place the character’s name or pronoun first in a speaker attribution (“Dave said”). Reversing the two (“said Dave”), though often done, is less professional. It has a slightly old-fashioned, first-grade-reader flavor (“Run spot, run” said Jane). After all, “said he” fell out of favor sometime during the Taft administration.
PS-The reason I hate it, is nearly, sorry, -ly word. Almost half the books he uses as written by “hackers” I have read, most I have enjoyed, and all seem to be selling very well.
"blah blah blah," said Jim.
"etc etc etc," said the man.
It sounded so awkward that I was surprised I never noticed it before while reading. Since then, in my writing, I've always uses he said and its equivalents. The fact that I didn't notice it until I heard it means that it probably doesn't matter as much as I now like to pretend it does.
If you want to throw another rationalization on the fire, natural sentence structure would suggest that "he" is the subject of this little phrase and "said" is the predicate, so "said he" makes as little sense as "threw he" or "ate he". That may just be a rationalization, though.
Regards,
Oliver
Stop angsting about trivia and get writing.
quote:
It sounded so awkward that I was surprised I never noticed it before while reading.
Hearing your work read out loud can be very painful, but if you can talk someone into doing it for you (so you can listen), you may be amazed by what you learn about your writing.
If you can't talk someone else into reading it out loud to you, the next best thing might be to try reading it out loud to yourself. Of course, you know how to say things and where to pause and where to put the emphasis, but you may still hear things you hadn't realized were there.
Without someone around, You can read to a recorder of some kind, there are even software to record your voice on the computer.
When I talk about adding action to the discussion, I would not consider the tags as JeanneT used as action tags.
JeanneT
quote:
"I'm not sure about action tags." John frowned."I always use them." Jane nodded.
Sean shrugged. "They're much better than those old-fashioned dialogue tags."
John had to nod in agreement. "You're right. Only fuddy-duddies use those things."
***
"I'm not sure about action tags." With a grunt John pulled the tent stake out of the hard clay.
"I always use them." Jane's hand deftly slipped the rolled tent into the tent bag.
Dousing the fire, Sean shrugged "They're much better than those old-fashioned dialog tags." He then backed away as the steam and smoke billowed up into his face.
Setting the stack of tent stakes on the hood of the car, John had to nod in agreement. "You're right. Only fuddy-duddies use those things." He watched the hammer slip over the other side of the car. He turned to take the tent from Jane, planning to get the hammer next.
***
This is what I mean about using action to point to who is talking. Preferably, the action described would advance the story, in this case, they leave the hammer behind. In some other scene, it might be to give scene detail or personality traits of the people.
Of course, one has to plan for that and I usually don't so a lot of my action really accomplishes nothing other than to avoid saying John said, Jane said
Sorry, I really couldn't resist.
I use yRead which you can get at spacejock.com. It is a good way to minimize the errors during editing before something goes to readers. I find it more useful than reading it out loud myself because I can still end up reading what I know should be there instead of what is. Listening to it while looking at a printed copy, I find a lot I had previously overlooked.
[This message has been edited by JeanneT (edited March 25, 2008).]
Okay, that makes sense. Thanks, JeanneT.
This place always reminds me that the more you know, the less you know. Every time I read a thread on this forum, I end up realizing something exists, but having absolutely no idea what to do with it. This was all a subconsciuos thing to me...
Now I'm going to start watch for it lol
Having said that, I preferred the action scenes, with no "said" at all.
JustInProse
Justin Armstrong
But I like "Said Bob" better than "Bob said". But that's just me.
I wish I had more time to read these forums tonight! LOL. Interesting stuff, here.