We all write with computers and if you're like me you write a paragraph or two, read it, change it, etc. I know about switching the internal editor off to get the first draft down but, sooner or later, we all go back and revise. It's easy to do that with a computer.
But before computers (BC!), with a pen or even a typewriter, revising must have been miserably tedious.
Did writers like Mark Twain (who was amongst the first to use a typewriter but had major works published from handwritten manuscripts) just revise laboriously? Or did they have brains the size of a planet, able to conceive sentences, paragraphs, whole chapters, writing with little need for revision?
Curious,
Pat
I've heard of other writers who'd take scissors to a typewritten manuscript, slice it up sentence by sentence and even word by word, then paste them together.
His reasoning is that when he's just hand-writing, he's getting out the plot, and all his thoughts, and moving along because he knows that when he goes back to type it in, THEN is when he will tidy up the prose and edit, edit, edit.
He's a huge proponent of "less is more", and apparently cuts mercilessly.
I completely understand his process -- it's one I used to use quite a bit once. Now I'm more worried about my tendency for procrastination, so the fewer steps I have toward getting a finished product, the better.
(In theory of course...tell that to all the post-it-notes scattered all over the tables and doors and walls of my house...)
[This message has been edited by Alethea Kontis (edited December 18, 2007).]
Neal Stephenson handwrites his manuscripts too, if I recall correctly.
quote:
Did writers like Mark Twain (who was amongst the first to use a typewriter but had major works published from handwritten manuscripts) just revise laboriously? Or did they have brains the size of a planet, able to conceive sentences, paragraphs, whole chapters, writing with little need for revision?
I'm sure it was a little bit of both, and depended somewhat on the writer. Some have argued that authors (and intellectuals in general) of previous generations had brains much better exercised than ours, due to a more word-centric media, and more rigorous, structured education. They also didn't have TV and the internet to distract, and perhaps 'soften' them. So maybe they were better at holding and composing information without hard copy in front of them.
But, undoubtedly elbow-grease did play a large role. I'm trying to recall whose work it was, but in an English literature textbook there were a few examples of original pages from a 17th or 18th century poet's work, and there were quite a lot of margin-scribbles going on. I'm sure it wasn't unique in that, as well.
I'm less curious about the mental feat so much as the physical one. Maybe the ease of typing has turned my arm muscles into pulp, but handwriting for more than a little while seems to age my body by fifty years. Joint pains, muscle cramps, etc.
I tried handwriting at one point because I like the idea of being connected to the vast majority of writers who Came Before(tm) (and I love notebooks, but that's another obsession), but I can't write as quickly as I can type, so it slows me down if I happen to get on a roll. And then, the writer's cramp.
I think handwriters, by choice or necessity, are just a different breed.
As to revising by typwriter and by hand, I've done both. On a typewritten draft, I double space and make any corrections by hand in the extra space and along the margins. For handwritten work, I usually place a circled number in the spot I want the new material to be inserted and then write the new material on the back of the sheet. Either way, when the next fresh draft is created, the extra material gets inserted.
On Mark Twain and typewriters...the early models were not what you would call easy to use. The QWERTY keyboard came later (but not by much), and there are more efficient arrangements like Dvorak that you can lay your hands on (in both senses).
"That early machine was full of caprices, full of defects--devlish ones. It had as many immoralities as the machine of to-day (sic) has virtues."
He could have been describing a computer!
http://etext.virginia.edu/railton/yankee/cymach4.html
I am amused to realize that I had forgotten why we double space manuscripts!
Thank for all the interesting contributions,
Pat
(I say proudly) I was the first person to take a computer to Clarion! Imagine!
quote:
I had forgotten why we double space manuscripts!
It wasn't just for our own editing, though. Editors need spaces between the lines so they can write notes to the typesetter.
Don't stop double-spacing just because you aren't using a typewriter any more.