Right now, my writing efforts are idling in neutral. I have two or three short stories lying around in draft form, where I'm letting them sit, so that when I return to them for (hopefully) final revision I've gotten some perspective on what I've written and any flaws. I think about what I'm going to write all the time but only occasionally put fingers to keyboard. I spend a lot of time fiddling with things. And I rarely submit anything to market.
But when I started, back in the middle ages, it was different. It was rough draft to final copy to submission. For a time, well after I started but quite long ago now, it was just one draft and submission.
Then computers came in. It was possible that there were no drafts other than the first, that I fiddled with what I wrote and then printed it out. But I then took to typing something out, printing it out, and retyping the whole thing---changing nearly every sentence as I went. Then I took to what I do now---a whole-lotta-nothin' in between short but furious burst of activity).
*****
So how much effort do you guys put into what you write? Time and energy? Revisions? Commentary on what you think of how others write?
Another angle on this question comes when you have a certain number of stories in submission. If memory serves, I have 22 in submission right now and I need a spreadsheet to keep track of where they are and when they went. Some of those stories are better than others, but all of them I've declared finished and sent into the world to find their fate. Meanwhile, I'm busy working on new material.
In other words, take a stand, fix what must be fixed then get the product out the door. If a 5000-word story takes more than a month, then something is wrong.
But that's my take as a compulsive procrastinator and clutterer.
Neoindra,
It is true that everyone has to do what works for them. My stories generally start from scenes or situations. I post science fiction and fantasy story ideas on line elsewhere, and average an idea a day, all year long. They all start from a scene or situation. I mostly tell what the story is about, giving just enough details to tell the story.
I wrote a novel based on one of those story ideas. I've expanded many of them into useable long stories.
What might help you is to write a several page piece TELLING what the story is about, and what happens and where it goes. Even tell how it ends. make changes until it is the story you want to tell, then start writing your novel in your normal way, using your short piece as your guide. It usually takes me an hour, and seldom longer than an hour and a half, to write one of these start to finish. I do it each night.
The idea I am suggesting is that you create a story to work as your guide. It can be as detailed or as vague as you need. It could become the story itself, by "editing" in the detail, action, and stuff. With the guide story, you can work out your plot changes before you have to write, and if you change something while writing, it is easy to change the guide story to keep you on track.
Also my stamina isn't what it used to be. I've aged somewhat since those turn-'em-out-in-a-day stories. My energy is more limited than it used to be.
There's also the lack-of-success issue. Motivation. I have confidence in some of what I've written, but, when I've shared it with others, nobody else has. It's hard to sit down and write something fresh, then to get it into the mail ("e" or otherwise) to someone, after years of "sorry, not interested." I can't stop making things up---but they start in my head, and, unless I can force myself, that's where they stay.
Word processing is a crutch to procrastination. Certainly it was easier to get something finished. when I just typed the words out on paper and they were there, impossible to change. The computer is also a distraction, with games and music and pictures even when not connected online (which, in some ways, is the ultimate distraction.)
I work on the computer with the TV on. I just glance over when something interesting happens, and pay attention to what I am doing when nothing is happening. It is rare that I will leave the computer and watch intently. The TV works more as background noise than anything. Combining TV and computer increases the time I can work. I live alone, so that is an advantage too....
With my daily story ideas, I write about six books of pure drivel every year...
In my writing, I already decided my stuff is unpublishable. I am more interested in coming up with the original story and will edit later when I have more time. Because of that, I have no problems with motivation.
There is a saying that I attribute to Orson that I use in my signatures on all the other boards.
"If you write, you are a writer. If you are not talented, You will not get published as often, or at all."
I live by that.
quote:
Oh, time was once I could write a story and have it in the mail that day---but time is also an issue in the here-and-now. With a forty-hours-a-week soul-draining night-job (that pays well), my time is more limited than when I was in school or just unemployed. (The last novel I managed to finished was finished in a time when I was, er, "off the clock.") Transit time, shopping, and family time take up more time. I'm a serious TV watcher, too. Sleep...I don't get enough, as is. So if I can bat out a few hundred words every couple of months, in the face of distraction and inertia, I feel I've accomplished something.
Wow, Robert, you've hit the stapling gun right on the apex of the cranium with this one. This was my major grumbling angst-ridden beef with 'society' for years...why aren't there sociopolitical mechanisms in place to release the promising 'starving creator' from the obligation to graft himself to the slaving meat wheel of commerce in order to focus wholly on his creative process? Writing has to compete with other obligations constantly; most of our priceless life force seems to be devoted to furthering the financial cause of some or other 'mother organization' we're a part of. Sure, there's a such thing as NEA grants...after all, controversially enough, people calling themselves 'pomo avant-garde artistes' were getting governmental funding for all kinds of wacky stuff, like taking photographs of a crucifix in a jar of urine, or constructing an American flag out of 3,968 color Polaroids of rotting fruit or Cadillac hood ornaments to be displayed in some gallery. In an ideal world, an SF writer, for example, could write up an NEA grant proposal, stating that he wants to write a 600-page space opera that also happens to comment on environmental issues and the population problem through different extrapolationary devices, which would serve to raise collective consciousness on these issues infinitely more so than a pomo art installation consisting of thousands of soiled undergarments stapled to a piece of plywood that sells for $5000.
quote:
There's also the lack-of-success issue. Motivation. I have confidence in some of what I've written, but, when I've shared it with others, nobody else has. It's hard to sit down and write something fresh, then to get it into the mail ("e" or otherwise) to someone, after years of "sorry, not interested." I can't stop making things up---but they start in my head, and, unless I can force myself, that's where they stay.
Sometimes a novel idea will gestate in my head for years before it ever sees paper. I write when the muse is around and kissing me, and write very little when not....or else, I blow muse-energy in online postings and rantings when I know damn well I need to crank out my quota on my novel instead.
quote:
Word processing is a crutch to procrastination. Certainly it was easier to get something finished. when I just typed the words out on paper and they were there, impossible to change. The computer is also a distraction, with games and music and pictures even when not connected online (which, in some ways, is the ultimate distraction.)
This reminds me of an article I read some time ago, in which economists and others of a sociological bent were debating as to the actual increase in general productivity due to the advent of the computer. As in, they decided almost unanimously that in fact it made things messier instead of more streamlined.
But that's neither here nor there. People write for different reasons and at different speeds. To make a living at it, I think you have to learn to write quickly. When I'm in practise I can crank out 2000 words a day with relative ease. When I'm out of practise then I do about 250 or 500 a day. So what I've learned, for myself, is that I have to write every day to keep the writing muscles in shape.
On TV watching...yeah, it's background noise to me, too. Right now I have it on Fox News and can listen with half an ear...but the trick doesn't work with entertainment programs: I just don't hear them. (I can listen to music with half an ear, too, but sometimes the temptation to sing or play along is just too much.) More serious TV watching occurs with me actually sitting in front of it, in which case writing is a bust. (My computer is in another room.) Recently I've been watching about two hours of "The Beverly Hillbillies" a day, and in between, plowing through DVDs of "The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe" and the early-1990s TV show "Dinosaurs." Some of this time could be more productively used...or maybe it's a vital unwinding from my soul-destroying (and physically demanding) job.
On discipline and writing...I think I've lost whatever discipline I had. I write fairly steadily when I'm inspired...and "inspired" comes every few months, three or four times a year. I'm probably due for another one any time, if past patterns hold. And when I'm inspired, I'm red hot, in most cases up to over ten thousand first draft words in less than a week.
On getting published eventually..."Eventually" has stretched out quite a while. I've been published here and there (look for some articles by me in back issues of "Workshop," for instance), but sometimes it seems I'm farther away from Step One of my goal---get published by a paying market, modified in the computer era to getting published in a paying print market---than I was when I started. (One reason I was attracted to Internet Fan Fiction was that if I wasn't going to get paid for writing, I might as well get some fun out of it.) I have hopes for "what I'm working on now"...but I had the same hopes with the first stories I sent out, and that didn't work out at all.
On NEA grants...working in my present job, which is "kinda" working for the government, has cured me of wanting or expecting *anything* of significance from the government. I'm trying to save up enough to retire at a relatively young age...and maybe then I'll have more energy for projects like writng. But I don't think I'd be able to con / snow / sell the NEA into shelling out...nor, philosophically, am I sure I'd want to...
Oh, and one other thing---how do you guys manage to quote from what's posted? I'm practically computer-illiterate. Is there something on-site that explains how?
And if you scroll down all the way on the entry screen, you'll see a small window that shows the current thread. You can use that to refer back to the discussion or get the quoted material.
I also have a serious online gaming addiction that needs feeding, although I'm working on that. Luckily, I also find that TV is not a problem for me, if the picture blew out I probably wouldn't notice until it was time to change the channel.
The best souless jobs for writers I've found are security guard jobs. The pay is terrible, but you sit all night and write, and all you have to do is make sure no one breaks into the building. I call it pretending to work while someone pretends to pay me.
quote:
When you are posting, look to the left. Click on *UBB Code is ON. All the instructions are there.
And if you scroll down all the way on the entry screen, you'll see a small window that shows the current thread. You can use that to refer back to the discussion or get the quoted material.
Trying it now...