I have two modern-day, male characters back in ancient greece, and I need to get one of them detained, preferably for breaking a social taboo of some sort (as opposed to doing something my readers will actually think of as "wrong")
Any thoughts?
Some more specifics, if you want: they are in a city that has just been conquered, posing as soldiers/sailors of the conquering army. I need one of them detained by their ship's captain (but seen/caught by someone else). Ideally, he/they will do something that is an embarrassment to their superior officer. And I need the one character detained by the captain, on the ship, so they wind up at sea with him when he casts off.
My "fall back" idea right now is to have them helping a woman - possibly by handing her a weapon - and making it a sort of social taboo. I'm wary of the idea, though, because I want to avoid making a big deal of the whole gender-issue, and why "our culture is superior to ancient civilizations." That's just a can of worms I don't want to deal with in this work (and frankly, it's overdone).
If the former, you'd better start reading some history books. We may be able to find you a taboo, but it won't help the realism of the rest of your story.
If the latter, you'd better start reading some history books. You'll be able to create the world far more realistically and convincingly if you have any idea how ancient civilizations worked.
For example the Boeotians were seen as a particularly uncivilised, boorish race by most of the rest of Greece, so a case of mistakenly naming your ship's captain a Boeotian might be enough to do it if your invaders were Greek, especially if we are talking early to mid-fifth century and your captain is actually Athenian. The Athenians saw themselves as being quite cultured and at this point were creating what became known as the Athenian Empire, actually being at war with the Boeotians for a period.
Another way in which your MCs could upset their captain could be in giving him a false lineage. Maybe they are trying to bluff somebody into believing they are on his side and can only half-remember the captain's name. They might call him Alcibiades, son of Xanthias, say, not knowing that Xanthias is actually a common slave's name, and thus maybe cause offence. Or this could tie in with the Boeotian thing and they could give him a Boeotian ancestry by mistake.
That's about all I can think of off the top of my head that could cause unintended offence. Ancestry to high-born and/or famous Greeks was always important, so that might not be too bad a route to go down if you don't want to use the male/female thing. However, it could be said that this has been used a fair bit too.
What's the red flag you're seeing? And does it have anything to do with the fact you wrote 100 bc and I wrote 1100?
(and for what it's worth, this is more of a fantasy novel than hard sf... though I still want to get the culture close to accurate)
Gwalchmai - I chose 1100 specifically to fall at the end of the Mycenaean age and the beginning of the dark ages. So basically, yes, I'm in Troy, shortly after its fall.
[This message has been edited by TheoPhileo (edited August 31, 2005).]
The red flag for me was this: When doing something that takes place in a real history, I expect a lot from an author. I don't often get it. Seriously, though...the details of culture, laws, and how people lived are part of a cultural feel that cannot be ascertained by asking a few questions. Plenty of people ask for help with research around here and I'm happy to help, but in this case I have this sense that there is a feel to how things were that requires something deeper than an answer to one simple question. I could be way off, but the fact that you asked about what kinds of things would get you in trouble that wouldn't be considered bad today made me think there's a lot more than just that question that you may want to answer for a truly authentic feel.
Maybe I'm just bitter because I've seen and read so much that steretypes history.
What you want...simplest solution is best. A guy claims to serving under a given captain, anyone else from that group would know he was an imposter immediately. If he was disarmed and seemed cooperative, then he'd be taken as a slave. Otherwise, he'd be killed. And that's that.
...Now to decide whether to do the research now, or to pick another story for TriMo.
Heh, I've always worked better under pressure.("If you wait until the last minute to do it, it only takes a minute to do.")
[This message has been edited by TheoPhileo (edited August 31, 2005).]
If not, get a copy of The King Must Die, which centers around the tale of Theseus. It's a good read, and a very instructive study of how an author can weave history and myth together.
[This message has been edited by Varishta (edited August 31, 2005).]
I love wikipedia...always a great place to get started.
quote:
The fact he can't speak the lingo would be a major drawback. Even if he could his accent would be less than perfect.
[This message has been edited by TheoPhileo (edited September 02, 2005).]
The upside of historical fiction is that the research is fun, provided you pick a time period that engages you. You end up becoming a collector of obscure facts and work hard to find a way to weave those little treasures into your text.
The problem is more profound than that. You use terms like "arrested" and "detained", talk about a "city" being conquered and "posing" as members of the invading force, have them get in trouble with a "superior officer" and so on.
All of those concepts are founded on a fundamental misapprehension about just how "civilized" the Greeks would have been during that period of time. It isn't a matter of getting the details right, you need to deal with basics here.
I don't see too much of a problem in using those in relation to that time period though. Certainly there were cities around back then, and a number of them were conquered or destroyed by invading forces. Admittedly there wouldn't have been superior officers as such and the jobs would have been done by the local kings and aristocracy, but seen from the POV of a modern day character, this shouldn't pose too many problems. Arrested and detained may cause problems, but there is no real reason to suppose members of the aristocracy wouldn't hunt down and take into a form of custody (as seen through the eyes of the MCs) somebody of the lower classes who had caused them offence in some way. However, that said, there is no real reason to suppose that they would either.
I do think you would be better off placing the story six or seven hundred years later though, in a period when the Greek states were more fully developed. There is much more information available on the aspects of everyday life which would make your story feel more real.