I was hoping to leave the character's name as-is, as a nod to my favorite author. Does this violate copyright law, and/or expose me to possible lawsuits?
Thanks for your input,
Jason
"Harry Potter smiled at the success of his magic used-car lot," it would have issues.
But if you do like so many other authors before:
"Artemis twirled his dagger expertly ..."
and
"Artemis Fowl was having a bad day ..."
and
"Artemis looked Drizzt in the eye ..."
Three different works involving characters with the name "Artemis," but no one cries.
So, in general I wouldn't worry about it.
The character's name in question is derived from a river mentioned in the Fellowship of the Ring. His first name is the same a very minor character from the Two Towers.
On the basis of the information given, I'd say that this name is probably obscure enough to be pointless as a nod to Tolkien, but prominent enough to be derivative.
Copyright may or may not be an issue, depending on how the character is used. Anything from Lord of the Rings is going to run a higher than average risk, but the risk is still not great as long as the character s clearly not supposed to be the other author's character.
So help me, though, if you're thinking of using something like Eomer Brandywine...or anything Brandywine.
I know that changing the name is probably the smart thing to do. The sad thing is that this character has lived in my mind so long with this name that it feels like it _belongs_ to the character.
Will this sentimentality get me in trouble?
If you were naming the character something like Sauron Baggins, it might be a distractingly poor choice for a name (unless your piece was humorous), but since most people are unlikely to see _____ Silverlode and say, "Hey, that's a LOTR name!" I think it just becomes a tiny bit of trivia.
Just for fun, can anyone thing of any instances of authors word-borrowing?
The only thing you would want to consider--and in this case you don't have to worry at all--is if it's quite obvious what you're doing. For example, in SALEM'S LOT King tipped his hat to Bram Stoker by naming the central bad guy Straker. Why? Because the name Stoker in a work about vampires is a little too obvious.
quote:
this character has lived in my mind so long with this name that it feels like it _belongs_ to the character.
Then that's his name. Don't think of it as being a matter of attribution to Tolkien at all (unless the character's background includes something about how he legally changed his name to something cool that was in Tolkien's writing--which I doubt is the case).
I don't know why you even brought up the issue. "Silverlode" is just a concatenation of "silver" and "lode" which is an entirely logical name for any place known to have a significant deposit of silver. There must be dozens of places called "Silverlode", I've probably lived near at least one.
I still think it's an odd name for a person, but at least it isn't as outright silly as a character named "Brandywine".
quote:
Just for fun, can anyone thing of any instances of authors word-borrowing?
I'm not sure what you mean, but I think Orson Scott Card borrowed the word "ansible" from Ursula K. Le Guin.
It's not something someone would really notice unless they were quite familiar with Heinlein's story. It was just my way of paying tribute to Heinlein for writing one of my favorite short stories.
In the example you give, Techno, and in light of the match in genre, I might avoid straight-across copying of one author's names to name a single character. The Silverlode is OK, but maybe a different first name--or different last name. Now the situation would be entirely different if, say, your story were set in modern times and the character's last name just happened to be Silverlode (or even Brandybuck or Took or Baggins) and his/her parents named him in honor of a character from LOTR. Or named him Peregrin Took Smith. His friends, mercifully, call him Perry. Mom and Dad still call him Pip. In my mind that would be OK--maybe TOO blatant a way of honoring Tolkien.
But naming your character in the way you describe in later posts--I don't know. It just doesn't quite sit right with me. Maybe because it sounds amateurish--like someone giving themselves a chat room name from their favorite book. Of course, I would have to know the entire name before I could make a more accurate judgement...
(Just a guess Gamling Silverlode?)
quote:
Just for fun, can anyone thing of any instances of authors word-borrowing?
Arthur C. Clarke, in 3001, mentioned a character called Dr. Susan Calvin, who is of course a character from many Asimov short stories.
David Langford wrote a rather amusing story called BLIT (http://www.infinityplus.co.uk/stories/blit.htm ) which has apparently spawned references in a couple of novels, Greg Egan's Permutation City and Ken McLeod's The Cassini Division. I've read neither personally, the information was found on Langford's web site.
Where you get into trouble is when you start copying story elements or characters. In other words, you cannot simply take Bilbo Baggins and plug him into your story with the same mannerisms, history, and so forth. That I would expect would be copywrite infringement or trademark violation if the name is actually trademarked.
So you could use the name. The real risk, however, is the more popular the story and the character, the less tollerant the reader will be for it. I think you've already addressed that, so I doubt it's an issue at all. Just keep it in mind. Becuase if I ever pick up a book with a character called "Bilbo" or "Brandywine" or whatever, I'm not likely to be to patient with it.
And the prior post about there being thousands of stories out there is too true. I was forced to change the name of one of my main characters in my latest novel because when I originally set the story down, his name was "Sam", short for "Samuel". However, one of my test readers immediately caught this and stated "I think of LOTR when I see that name". Sigh. This was BEFORE I had even read LOTR. I figured, how could a name so common as "Sam" be a risk?
Well...it was. I changed it and I think it actually worked out better.
[This message has been edited by rjzeller (edited June 30, 2004).]