In modern writing, mainly in email and the internet, ". . ." has become increasingly popular. I'm not referring to a the usage in a quote whereas ". . ." replaces a bulk of text, nor to ". . ." as an indication of dialogue that trails off. I am referring to its use as an explicative pause.
I do have a point to this, a comma is generally used to indicate a pause. ". . ." in common vernacular usage indicates an emphasized or extended pause. Has anyone else out there seen popular press/published uses of this? Is it common and/or acceptable?
I find this application of style particularly usesful and find it to be a modern extension of language. I have used it extensively, and Lord willing - I can use it in the future . . . without fear of criticism.
Don't be tempted to use more periods or to let your word processor program turn them into three dots with no spaces, this is not correct.
A dash--em dash can mean a longer pause than a comma, it means a pause always, not words left out.
I use both as to me they "sound" different.
Just be sure to read up on the latest usage and use them correctly.
Shawn
One type is a grammatical pause. A grammatical pause is one which is used to indicate a separation or change. In writing, there are various punctuation marks that indicate such a pause: periods, commas, colons, semicolons, dashes, parenthesis, etc. In speaking, such pauses are represented by -- strangely enough -- pauses.
The other type is a dramatic pause. Dramatic pauses are not part of the grammar of the sentence. Dramatic pauses can be used to show that the speaker is hesitant, nervous, uncertain, in pain, or just plain dramatic.
To indicate a dramatic pause, I use the ellipsis (". . .") because it seems best suited to the task.
[This message has been edited by EricJamesStone (edited January 04, 2004).]