I'm thinking about updating my cover letter. Having seen on several writer's guidelines that cover letters really should be kept brief and to a bare minimum (ie, title, word count, and the usual courtesies) that's what I've always done. NOW I'm curious as to whether I should say anything about my story, like a one liner about location, protagonist, and set up.
Any thoughts???
Thanks,
Jennifer
Aim High
Chris
PS -- What is the usual pay (if any) for a short story. Say, 6-10,000 words...if not more?
[This message has been edited by cvgurau (edited April 19, 2003).]
quote:
Dear [editor's name],Enclosed is a XXXX-word manuscript entitled, "XXXX." I would appreciate if if you would consider it for publication in your magazine, XXXX. I have encluded a SASE for your reply; recycle the manuscript when you are finished with it.
Sincerely,
XXXX
quote:
I have recently been published in XXXX, XXXX, and XXXX.
DO NOT, DO NOT, DO NOT say anything about your story!!! The cover letter is not the place for promoting your story. Think of it as an very brief introduction: here's my story, and here's what to do with the manuscript when you're finished.
Some people don't think you even need a cover letter with a short story. If I were an editor I would find this rather cold, as if some punk just through his or her manuscript on my desk without taking the time to say hi and shake my hand. So I always include a cover letter unless the magazine explicitly says not to include one (I haven't found one yet).
If you really want to get serious about submissions, go to this link and read carefully: www.speculations.com/slush.htm .
Good luck.
[This message has been edited by Balthasar (edited April 19, 2003).]
It's just...wow.
I think I'm going to cry.
Okay, I'm not, but still...that's pretty harsh. Is this stuff for real? 'Cuz if it is, I gotta say, it looks like a bleak world out there for a amateur writer such as myself. A bleak, bleak world, indeed.
Bummer.
Chris
Ok so you are brief, yeah! But once an editor sees that you are not published--plink. That was the sound of your sub being recycled.
If you can write for some "free" no paying publications. (Boy, the magazine I work for could use some quality submissions!!!)(hint)(and we do pay one writer per month--an editors choice payment)
Also, come up with a what if line--a simple plot summery. Add it after word count ect.
Shawn
[This message has been edited by srhowen (edited April 19, 2003).]
What magazine are you with, srhowen, that's looking for ms?
Have a great weekend!
[This message has been edited by SiliGurl (edited April 19, 2003).]
Shawn
They have the product before them to test. They certainly won't buy it if it is bad, even if it came with the best cover letter written.
So if an editor likes a cover letter, I think it might be a good idea for the editor to say they prefer a cover letter with a one sentence synopsis.
quote:
Okay, I'm not, but still...that's pretty harsh. Is this stuff for real? 'Cuz if it is, I gotta say, it looks like a bleak world out there for a amateur writer such as myself. A bleak, bleak world, indeed.
The strange thing is that acting like a professional is the easy part. If an author doesn't conform to the current etiquette of manuscript submission, then why should that author or his or her work be taken seriously?
The hard part is moving from the 85th percentile to the 99th percentile -- to the place where an editor says, "This story is really good, now what am I going to do with it?" So I don't think the Speculations article is that bleak. Realistic is more like it.
The only point the Speculations article makes that I find specious is the point it makes about the use of a pen name. Why would an editor care if an author wants to use a pen name? There's no shame in that. And besides, if my legal name is David Douglas Smith (which it's not), and my friends and family call me Dave, and I prefer my byline to read, D. D. Smith, or David Smith, or Douglas Smith, or Doug Smith, that's a pen name even though it's my legal name.
Shawn -
quote:
I'm an editor--I like a cover letter, and I like a one liner in it that grabs---a cliff hanger.
quote:
Ok so you are brief, yeah! But once an editor sees that you are not published--plink. That was the sound of your sub being recycled.
Penboy_np -
I am, of course!
[This message has been edited by Balthasar (edited April 19, 2003).]
BTW, there are still many magazines of high quality that accept amateur submissions. Darrell Schweitzer of Weird Tales told me face-to-face that they accept stories from previously-unpublished authors, and one of the officers of the SFWA told me that Fantasy and Science Fiction does also. The latter is particularly attractive, in that their response time on submissions is remarkably fast for the industry (about a month, sometimes less, from date of receipt). Plus, there are tons of small press out there openly soliciting work. So don't give up before you even try!
Besides which, I'm getting better with each one (at least, I hope so!) and I really like this one I just finished. It's a monster though, clocking in at about 8,700 words so that eliminates a boatload of markets!
Shawn
Chris