What is the best advice you've ever heard, read, written?
For those who've read books on writing, which , in your opinion, is the best?
Character and Viewpoint, Orson Scott Card
Writing Science Fiction and Fantasy, Orson Scott Card
Creating Short Fiction, Damon Knight (I still love the part about Fred).
You might want to check parts of the topic A motherlode of resources? in relation to your query.
"A writer writes, always."
It is a very simple concept but it took me several years when I first started writing to realize how true this was (in my own defense, I was only about 11 or 12 when I first started writing seriously) and since I have attempted to start a writing club on my college campus I have learned that many would be writers don't realize this either.
Just a written
Thought
[This message has been edited by Thought (edited April 28, 2002).]
He says something to this effect:
"If you cannot sum up your characters as 'emotion vs emotion,' you haven't thought hard enough. For example, MacBeth was 'loyalty vs ambition.' Conflict is not external, but within your characters' souls."
and
"Slam-bang action is not conflict. The slush piles of all SF magazines are clogged with stories containing nothing but violence, no conflict within a character's mind."
Uberslacker
OSC reminds me that the reader pays good money to be invested in people and situations that I create. The Stephen King instructs me to "eliminate unnecessary words."
Together, they tell me that including unnecessary words is just like forcing my reader to buy something he/she doesn't want.
1. Writing is a series of asking "why?" Why did the chicken cross the road? To get to the other side. Why did he want to get to the other side? Because there was some chicken feed there. Why was there chicken feed there? And why would the chicken risk its life crossing a road for some stupid chicken feed? Etc.
2. He explained the difference between shorts and novels, which probably all of you know, but I'll share it anyway because it's pretty cool. He said that when a writer wants to write a short story, his ultimate goal is getting there. He is in a boat crossing a river, and he paddles like crazy. In a novel, he's out for a fishing trip, dropping anchor to fish sometimes, floating downriver if that looks more interesting. Not perfect, but that's kind of how my thoughts go when I'm planning for a novel.
This can be an extremely painful experience, however, but it is one way to find out, loud and clear, where the problems are.
"Never, never, never, never, never give up."
http://www.soundsofhistory.com/
That recording is there.
I love it too.
I find that putting a piece to rest for a while then going back to it can be amazing. Suddenly I find error and problems and tone or voice I had never intended. I cringe.
I hate to think of how horrible it'd be for me if I had somebody else reading that dreg to me out loud!!
My 2 pennies
1. You must write.
2. You must finish what you write.
We'll not discuss rule number 3 because it's a topic on it's own.
As for books, Dovid Morrell's "Lessons From a Lifetime of Writing" has some really good advice in it. He approaches his worldbuilding in a different way.
Another good web site to check out is www.hollylisle.com
Rux
:}
(1) Write a lot.
(2) Read a lot.
(3) Write with your door closed.
(4) Rewrite with your door open.
The best books I've read on the subject -- at least the ones I keep coming back to -- are:
(1) Stephen King, On Writing
(2) John Gardner, On Becoming a Novelist
(3) John Gardner, The Art of Fiction: Notes on the Craft for Young Writers (read "young" as "beginning")
(4) John Gardner, On Moral Fiction (study of literary criticism)
Books that I don't refer to anymore, but that I found very helpful.
(1) Damon Knight, Creating Short Fiction
(2) Orson Scott Card, Characters and Viewpoints
(3) Nancy Kress, Beginnings, Middles, and Ends
(4) Orson Scott Card, Writing Science Fiction and Fantasy
(5) Janet Burroughs, Writing Fiction
(6) Anne Lamott, Bird by Bird: Instructions on Life and Writing
(7) Dorothea Brande, Becoming a Writer
(8) Ray Bradbury, Zen and the Art of Writing
And last, the next book I'm going to read on the craft is Eudora Welty's One Writer's Beginnings
For me, this suddenly revealed why some stories are so powerful and leave you satisfied and why others leave you unsettled and restless.
Don't treat the people you love like crap.
OSC.
Write with your door closed.
Rewrite with your door open.
What exactly was Herr King talking about here?
quote:
Balthasar, could you elaborate?
Write with your door closed.
Rewrite with your door open.What exactly was Herr King talking about here?
I'm not Balthasar, but I know what King was referring to. He believes that a writer should write his first draft all alone, in his own solitary space, without tainting his story with the input of others.
King says that a writer should then put away his story and pull it out again months later, when it's fresh. And then rewrite it, taking into full consideration all criticism.
Write with the door closed; rewrite with the door open.
I'm not sure I agree with King, but if memory serves, that's what he said. *grin*
For King, you write with the door closed. While you're working, you don't show your work to anyone, no matter how tempting that might be. You keep going, writing with the world on the outside, doing your job of getting your story down as you see it.
For King, you rewrite with your door open. You realize that it's time to make the story presentable. You take out the parts that don't work--no matter how much you love them.
Let me quote King:
quote:
Gould said something else that was interesting on the day I turned in my first two pieces: write with the door closed, rewrite with the door open. Your stuff starts out being just for you, in other words, but then it goes out. Once you know what the story is and get it right -- as right as your can, anyway -- it belongs to anyone who wants to read it.
When you write with your door closed, you have to put your fears on the outside. You can't be afraid of what your spouse, or family, or friends, or parents, or siblings, or pastor, or anyone will say or think of you. You have to be free to write what you want to write. You have to be free to tell the truth how you see it.
Then, once it's one paper, and once you've let it sit for a week or two (or a month or two, if it's a novel), then you have to decide if you want to open the door for that story. Most of the time you can--so long as what you've written is fiction. Even if it's semi-autobiographical fiction. But every so often, you know that this particular piece should stay behind closed doors for a while. Not because it's bad, but because it might be misunderstood.
But I write a lot of main-stream fiction, and most of it is rooted somehow in my childhood. As Flannery O'Connor said, if you've lived past 20, you have enough writing material to last you the rest of your life. For a long time I resisted telling these stories, even though they were fiction rooted in life. And then I realized that so long as I wrote with my door closed, it didn't matter. I wouldn't have to show anyone these pieces. What I found, however, is that these stories aren't so much a fictionalized version of fact, but pure fiction that has merely a glimmer of autobiography about them.
I've also found that all of this doesn't apply as much when I'm writing speculative fiction (it still applies because I write character-driven speculative fiction).
[This message has been edited by Balthasar (edited April 03, 2004).]
Writer's Digest Febuary 2001 issue Writing your second draft
Shawn
Now, this piece of advice is not to be used all the time, of course. But it's useful when you think a scene is boring, or when you find yourself "blocked."
An examples of how I've used this advice:
In my novel-in-progress, I had a scene where one character, due to a misunderstanding, thinks the protagonist has insulted his honor. My protagonist is a nice guy, so when he understands why the other character felt insulted, he says he's sorry for the misunderstanding, and the breach between the characters is healed. And the chapter basically has nowhere left to go, even though it's short. BOREDOM!
So I have my protagonist say he's not sorry. This escalates the problem, and the other character eventually is forced by his notions of honor to challenge the protagonist to a duel the protagonist can easily win but which could mean the challenger's death. HIGH STAKES AND TENSION!
Of course, both versions of the chapter end up with breach between the characters being healed. But the second version was a lot more interesting to read.
The important thing about using this advice is that when you have the character say the opposite of what he was going to say, you have to come up with all the reasons why the character would say that. That forces you to make the character more complex, and may also force you to make the plot more complex. (In the example above, it even made the setting more complex, since I had to come up with a plausible reason why the laws of the country allowed commoners to challenge lords to a duel and the traditions associated with dueling.)