This is topic Iran loses most of it's ballistic missiles in forum Books, Films, Food and Culture at Hatrack River Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.hatrack.com/ubb/main/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=057620

Posted by SoaPiNuReYe (Member # 9144) on :
 
Mossad's at it again.
Or maybe the CIA this time. I think it has to be related to Stuxnet though.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
Wow.

I see no reason to believe that the CIA, Mossad, and even MI6 and certain other players could not have worked in tandem for these operations.

[ October 27, 2010, 08:55 AM: Message edited by: BlackBlade ]
 
Posted by Juxtapose (Member # 8837) on :
 
Stuxnet?
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
Stuxnet.

A very remarkable computer virus.
 
Posted by SoaPiNuReYe (Member # 9144) on :
 
I highly doubt that the US was behind Stuxnet, but I can believe that they may have played a role (albeit a very minor one), in this strike. The way the mainstream media has kept mum about this leads me to believe something is up. Apparently this happened a couple weeks ago, and I haven't heard anything on it until now. Interesting times we live in, wouldn't you say?
 
Posted by fugu13 (Member # 2859) on :
 
BlackBlade: did you mean "in tandem"?
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
While the subject is still totally interesting, I want everyone to remember that this is an article by Debka, which wantonly sensationalizes and won't even bother to differentiate fact from rumor.

quote:
In the same way, the regime went to great lengths to cover up the ravages wrought to their nuclear and military control systems by the Stuxnet virus - which is still at work.
ravages you say
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by fugu13:
BlackBlade: did you mean "in tandem"?

Yes, and I had to read my statement twice more before the tandem illusion disappeared revealing tangent. Thanks.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
I wonder how much, if any of what was reported, was misinformation. Was it really "hand-rigged" bombs, or a bunker buster?
 
Posted by DSH (Member # 741) on :
 
A bunker buster (presumably dropped from an over-flying bomber) would certainly have sparked more public outrage than a hand-rigged bomb designed to look like an accident.
 
Posted by SoaPiNuReYe (Member # 9144) on :
 
http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=41910

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/146392.html

http://www.rttnews.com/Content/GeneralNews.aspx?Id=1444705&SM=1

Some more sources. All these really confirm however, is that a fire took place at the base and that quite a few soldiers died as a result. I don't doubt that this wasn't a coordinated strike however. It's just that whoever's behind it is doing a great job of covering it up.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
See, now this is fun.
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
Until Iran decides to claim this as a casus beli against Israel and launches a full assault.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Blayne Bradley:
Until Iran decides to claim this as a casus beli against Israel and launches a full assault.

They won't, there's way too many other countries that would get involved in that venture.
 
Posted by Stephan (Member # 7549) on :
 
Sounds to me like nobody wants to admit anything happened.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
It's like Israel's nukes. Plausible deniability.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
I wouldn't say they were "lost"...

"Separated into component parts by use of explosive force" sounds so much better.
 


Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2