This is topic The Ten Commandments According to Obama in forum Books, Films, Food and Culture at Hatrack River Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.hatrack.com/ubb/main/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=055842

Posted by TheQuestioner (Member # 11747) on :
 
Oh my...

The Ten Commandments According to Obama
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
(Edit: we should let PJ deal with this)
 
Posted by FlyingCow (Member # 2150) on :
 
Well, now that Orincoro edited his post, my "+1" doesn't make any sense.

[Razz]
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
You and I share this special +1 sentiment. I will cherish it.
 
Posted by TheQuestioner (Member # 11747) on :
 
What no comments about it?
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
So flying Cow, how do you feel about the 49ers of San Francisco's chances of having a slightly better season of American Football this year? What American Football League franchise do you support or "root for" as we say? Is there an American Football League franchise in your nearest metropolitan area, or the one in which you were born?
 
Posted by andi330 (Member # 8572) on :
 
Personally, I'm a Skins fan. I'm hoping that this is going to be our year.
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
How very interesting fellow Hatrack online community forum poster andi330. You are referring of course to the Redskins of Washington, and their chances of making it to the American Football League Championship, or "Superbowl," humorously named after one late National Football League commissioner's son's "superball," a rubber toy popular at the time.

When was the last victory in the "Superbowl" as it is called, for your Washington Redskins?
 
Posted by Nick (Member # 4311) on :
 
I don't really have anything constructive to say.

[ July 21, 2009, 10:15 PM: Message edited by: Nick ]
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
So Nick, what professional American Football team do you support these days? The Cowboys of Dallas perhaps? They seem to be popular.
 
Posted by Papa Janitor (Member # 7795) on :
 
It's often recommended that one lurk a bit before jumping into the fray here to get a feel for how things are in this community. If you've actually been lurking for the past 8 months, fantastic. But you must have missed the repeated incidents where people post a link to an article with no comments at all and catch an earful (eyeful) for it.

It's frankly somewhat suspicious that a first post here would be so delayed and so out of the blue. There's no general rule against taking or advocating a particular political stance, so you're not breaking a rule there, and there's no rule against posting links to something you consider interesting, or doing so on your first post, or anything like that. It's likely to be ineffective, though, as you may be able to tell based on the first few responses (though I didn't see the unedited first response, so I can't speak to it).

Because of the content and timing of your first post (and the time between joining and posting), there will likely be (possibly rampant) speculation as to whose alternate identity you might be. I'm sorry if this results in your being unfairly accused. If you are using Hatrack to advertise your own blog, that's unacceptable, so please show us you're interested in more than that from your time here.

Welcome to Hatrack, I hope. Others, you don't necessarily need to jump to a conclusion immediately. Thank you for bringing it to my attention, though.

--PJ
 
Posted by andi330 (Member # 8572) on :
 
Meh...so it's been almost 20 years. I won't be a fair weather fan. If you can't follow your team during their bad years, then you aren't a real fan.
 
Posted by Nick (Member # 4311) on :
 
I prefer the 49ers over Dallas if you must know. [Smile]
 
Posted by scifibum (Member # 7625) on :
 
I don't think it's clear whether TheQuestioner was saying:

a) "oh my, look how dreadful Obama is" (which, coupled with the content of the link, MIGHT be cause for eye rolling, although if one forgives the melodramatic presentation there MIGHT be something worth discussing IF TheQuestioner would care to reframe the argument with something other than movie poster sensationalism)(I trust the multiple emphatic qualifiers will preempt all but the most rebutty of rebuttals).

b) "oh my, look how silly some anti-Obama wingnuts are getting" which would probably be a relatively unchallenged stance if coming from one of our more established members (but in turn might not be worth much discussion, unless someone ELSE decided to undertake a relatively cogent defense of the thesis).

c) something else.

Given that, there's certainly no reason for hostility. Welcome, TheQuestioner, and please feel free to elucidate your views on Obama's presidency and the curious meme of divinity.

--
Edit: well, I messed up my post by providing an opinion about the uncertain nature of the OP, and then concluding that "certainly" something must be so. Please assume I meant "in my opinion" where I wrote "certainly."
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
Scifi, you're getting a little off the topic here.

What's your favorite football team, or what flavor of Jell-o brand pudding do you most prefer, and at what time of day?

I say 49ers, banana, and mid afternoon.

How say you?
 
Posted by scifibum (Member # 7625) on :
 
*Hurls pistachio pudding at Orincoro*

May Steve Young deride your pudding in your dreams.

Edit: (wow, I had no idea how dirty that would seem)
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
Damn! Pistachio. I should have thought of that.

I'll take Pistachio only if the graham cracker crust, (not to be mistaken for the inferior oreo-brand variety, but a real crust of crushed graham crackers with butter and a little sugar) is included.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I like processed cheese. Whenever I move to new area I buy the store brand american cheese from all the nearby grocery stores so I can tell which one is the best.
 
Posted by andi330 (Member # 8572) on :
 
:blinks:

Wow. I thought I liked cheese. I was wrong, and I bow before your superior cheese worship.
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
Do you then proceed to buy said cheese, or do you compare prices and devise some metric for determining the cost over quality ratio of any given store brand cheese, and then buy according to the most quality for the lowest per-slice price?
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
Personally, I track all my personal food expenditures according to how presentable the labels may appear when placed in a pleasing order inside my refrigerator. This way, I can always be sure of having an attractive collection of comestibles at all times, even if they are foods that I do not like or which are useless for cooking.
 
Posted by Strider (Member # 1807) on :
 
I bought some really great aged Gouda the other day. It was like a parmesan with a gouda taste. mmmmmm....
 
Posted by andi330 (Member # 8572) on :
 
[Laugh]

quote:
Originally posted by Orincoro:
Personally, I track all my personal food expenditures according to how presentable the labels may appear when placed in a pleasing order inside my refrigerator. This way, I can always be sure of having an attractive collection of comestibles at all times, even if they are foods that I do not like or which are useless for cooking.


 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
quote:
Do you then proceed to buy said cheese, or do you compare prices and devise some metric for determining the cost over quality ratio of any given store brand cheese, and then buy according to the most quality for the lowest per-slice price?
Officially I'd compare prices, but the store brand cheese is usually pretty uniform in price, so I just get the best cheese.
 
Posted by Juxtapose (Member # 8837) on :
 
quote:
This way, I can always be sure of having an attractive collection of comestibles at all times...
A cosmetically complaisant collection of comestibles, then?
 
Posted by Da_Goat (Member # 5529) on :
 
Nick, I thought you left? Hey!

I really like pepper jack cheese. I feel like a cheese poseur, though, because I'm just not a big fan of monterey jack. It seems like I should like both. It's like preferring a friend just because they're wearing a sweater.
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
Best. Thread. Ever.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
quote:
Best. Thread. Ever.
Truly. Let it be known that we are all posting in this high quality thread!
 
Posted by TheQuestioner (Member # 11747) on :
 
Well..... so much for seeing what you all would say without saying who I was.
 
Posted by Jamio (Member # 12053) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by TheQuestioner:
Well..... so much for seeing what you all would say without saying who I was.

Don't be so silly. I don't think my existence here was acknowledged until my fifth post, at least, and here the very best and kindest Hatrackers are giving their own personal pudding recommendations. That's high honor. Would you care for tapioca?
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
I recommend Cozy Shack Tapioca pudding. Yumm!!!
 
Posted by imogen (Member # 5485) on :
 
I'm a big fan of sticky date pudding. I even bought the dates today so we could make some.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
You Brits and Aussie call everything pudding. In America, 'sticky date pudding' would probably be labeled date bread, or date cake. We think a pudding should be smooth, soft and creamy.
 
Posted by AchillesHeel (Member # 11736) on :
 
I dont know, sometimes I cant figure out who I like better, Johnny Cash or George Thorogood. Cash was willing to cover a good song no matter where it came from, but Thorogood is still alive. After reading the link this was the most intelligent response void of insulting comments aimed at your mental state.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
You Brits and Aussie call everything pudding. In America, 'sticky date pudding' would probably be labeled date bread, or date cake. We think a pudding should be smooth, soft and creamy.

Do the Brits have a separate word for "real" pudding? (i.e. the soft creamy kind)? If they do (as in crisps, fries and chips), I'll let it slide, but if they seriously use the same word to describe a weird bread-thing as a gloppy tasty goo, that's just ridiculous.
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
I was actually pretty impressed with the video release of Justice's DVNO.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etWi1bOotd0
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
Americans call bread pudding, pudding. It's not smooth or creamy.
 
Posted by adenam (Member # 11902) on :
 
But I learned from Harry Potter that the Brittish used pudding to mean any desert.

Did I learn wrong?
 
Posted by andi330 (Member # 8572) on :
 
I've only ever heard bread pudding described as "bread pudding" her in America. It's a separate thing, denoted by the addition of the word "bread."
 
Posted by adenam (Member # 11902) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by rivka:
Americans call bread pudding, pudding. It's not smooth or creamy.

That's only because they can't pronounce kugel.
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
as far as I am concerned, bread pudding and rice pudding are two things which are very very great when they are done right, but are more often made with a kind of a C- mediocrity.

There's a particular sort of rice pudding that can be found along the American road-trip experience, sequestered away in diners off of interstates, tended to by establishments that have escaped the savages of modern homogenization and sit as anachronistic remnants of a faded culinary era. When you've chanced across it and tasted its lovingly prepared, cinnamon-infused essence, you can say you've been part of something larger than yourself.
 
Posted by kmbboots (Member # 8576) on :
 
Sausage-like meat patties are also pudding.

ETA: And I have found mediocre bread pudding to be wonderful.
 
Posted by Javert (Member # 3076) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by TheQuestioner:
Well..... so much for seeing what you all would say without saying who I was.

Nah. Whatever I would have said had this not been an alt would have been the exact thing I would have said to the alt.

Now, anybody up for some treacle tart?
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by adenam:
quote:
Originally posted by rivka:
Americans call bread pudding, pudding. It's not smooth or creamy.

That's only because they can't pronounce kugel.
[ROFL]

I didn't realize you were an alt for Esther. [Wink]
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kmbboots:
Sausage-like meat patties are also pudding.

You're pudding!
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by adenam:
But I learned from Harry Potter that the Brittish used pudding to mean any desert.

Funny. I learned it from Pink Floyd. Probably a generational thing.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lisa:
quote:
Originally posted by adenam:
But I learned from Harry Potter that the Brittish used pudding to mean any desert.

Funny. I learned it from Pink Floyd. Probably a generational thing.
Did you exchange, your puddings for bread?
 
Posted by scifibum (Member # 7625) on :
 
Your heroes for toast.
 
Posted by Synesthesia (Member # 4774) on :
 
Pudding. Hurm.
I need a good chocolate mousse recipe. Chocolate mousse with extra chocolate.
Possibly used as frosting on a cake with whipped cream.
Shame I have no copper bowls.
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
Banana-a-aaaaa,
you can't taaaa-a-aaaake it with you

Because we eat pudding,
like ripples on a gra-a-aaape jello
 
Posted by MrSquicky (Member # 1802) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Raymond Arnold:
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
You Brits and Aussie call everything pudding. In America, 'sticky date pudding' would probably be labeled date bread, or date cake. We think a pudding should be smooth, soft and creamy.

Do the Brits have a separate word for "real" pudding? (i.e. the soft creamy kind)? If they do (as in crisps, fries and chips), I'll let it slide, but if they seriously use the same word to describe a weird bread-thing as a gloppy tasty goo, that's just ridiculous.
It's worse than that. British people can't actually tell the difference. If you put the two in front of them and asked for the gloppy goo, they wouldn't know which one you meant.
 
Posted by kmbboots (Member # 8576) on :
 
And would likely just pass the peas.
 
Posted by Bella Bee (Member # 7027) on :
 
British people call pudding 'Angel Delight'. Only it's not really pudding because you don't cook it.

Of course, apart from calling cake pudding, there's also my favourite, Black pudding (made of pig blood - it's so yummy) and Yorkshire pudding (made of Yorkshire).
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kmbboots:
And would likely just pass the peas.

That's because the way they cook peas, they ARE gloppy goo.
 
Posted by Bella Bee (Member # 7027) on :
 
Or pease pudding.
 
Posted by kmbboots (Member # 8576) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by rivka:
quote:
Originally posted by kmbboots:
And would likely just pass the peas.

That's because the way they cook peas, they ARE gloppy goo.
That is the inference I was aiming for.
 
Posted by lem (Member # 6914) on :
 
I'll have two bowls of split peas soup please.
 
Posted by Jamio (Member # 12053) on :
 
They don't even say the whole word, even. They just say pud. What's for pud? I'm making pud. Pud's on. If that doesn't speak of low standards, I don't know what does.

From now on, all sex is quicky.
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
I'd hit that.
 
Posted by adenam (Member # 11902) on :
 
quote:
pud
I read that as mud (which I thinks makes more sense anyway).
 
Posted by Dead_Horse (Member # 3027) on :
 
I'll have some wingnut cheese and a Yorkshire pudding. I knew those little yapping dogs had to be good for something.
 
Posted by MightyCow (Member # 9253) on :
 
Sorry to join this discussion late guys.

I just want to say that I hope that the 9ers do well this year. I'd like to see a game at Candlestick before they move, which it sounds like they will be doing soon. [Frown]
 
Posted by Sterling (Member # 8096) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jamio:
They don't even say the whole word, even. They just say pud. What's for pud? I'm making pud. Pud's on. If that doesn't speak of low standards, I don't know what does.

From now on, all sex is quicky.

First time I heard breakfast called "brekky" in New Zealand, I wanted to hurt someone. Preferably, a Smurf.
 
Posted by Icarus (Member # 3162) on :
 
::shakes head::

Estos americanos. En Cuba le decíamos al vino vino y al pan pan. Aquí le dicen al pan "bread" y al vino "wine."
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
Yeah, but in theory these countries all speak English.
 
Posted by Jon Boy (Member # 4284) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Icarus:
::shakes head::

Estos americanos. En Cuba le decíamos al vino vino y al pan pan. Aquí le dicen al pan "bread" y al vino "wine."

Your in America, speak English! [Mad]
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
(pssst, speak American!)
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Icarus:
::shakes head::

Estos americanos. En Cuba le decíamos al vino vino y al pan pan. Aquí le dicen al pan "bread" y al vino "wine."

Oido que dices, porque los bárbaros gringos piensan que pueden usar inglés a expresar los sentamientos complicados del alma. Que pena, dijo! Recuerdais esto: Conduzco un coche, no "manejo un carro," juego fútbol, no "soquer," o "basquetból" y uso un ordernador, no uso una computadora.

Viva la Espana! O Cuba! O Alguna!
 
Posted by PSI Teleport (Member # 5545) on :
 
I still wanna talk about bread pudding. My first experience with bread pudding was meh, even though the sauce had ameretto in it and was quite interesting. Unfortunately, my standards had been set far too high by several people claiming that this particular bread pudding would be better than sex. I have since concluded that all of those people have very unsatisfying sex.
 
Posted by MightyCow (Member # 9253) on :
 
I really like a good bread pudding, but I wouldn't take one over sweet lovin'.
 
Posted by Sterling (Member # 8096) on :
 
Entre el "flan" de Espana y el "Ricardo manchado" de Ingles, prefiero el flan, por supuesto.
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MightyCow:
I really like a good bread pudding, but I wouldn't take one over sweet lovin'.

I'm going to have to agree.
 
Posted by scifibum (Member # 7625) on :
 
Thirded. MightyCow would definitely take sweet lovin' over a good bread pudding.

And just so you know how much restraint I can exercise, I'm totally not going to try to make a spoonerism about it.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
Fourthed, although I did once have a flourless chocolate expresso torte (Certainly the Brits would have called it a pudding) that was very nearly as good as sex. Sadly it seems to have been a one off. I've been back to the same cafe and ordered the same torte several times, but its never been quite as good as that first one.
 
Posted by Sterling (Member # 8096) on :
 
I've never had both offered at the same time. They generally seem to come up in wildly different contexts. Perhaps I've been attending the wrong dinner parties.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sterling:
I've never had both offered at the same time. They generally seem to come up in wildly different contexts. Perhaps I've been attending the wrong dinner parties.

I've never technically been offered them truly simultaneously, but I have on occasion chosen to skip dessert so my stomach wouldn't be too full for the after dinner entertainment.

I'm still waiting for them to bring around the dessert menu that lists sex as one of the options.
 
Posted by PSI Teleport (Member # 5545) on :
 
Trust me, guys. It's far easier to introduce dessert to the sex, not the other way around.

quote:
And just so you know how much restraint I can exercise, I'm totally not going to try to make a spoonerism about it.
And the result of this comment was that I spent a full minute coming up with every possible spoonerism, some of which were humorous; others, disgusting.
 
Posted by Sterling (Member # 8096) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by PSI Teleport:
Trust me, guys. It's far easier to introduce dessert to the sex, not the other way around.

And yet I suspect bread pudding would be few couples' first choice.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
Fourthed, although I did once have a flourless chocolate expresso torte...

I take it that Mormons can consume things that have coffee in them as long as they aren't liquids? That's interesting; I'd have assumed that that wasn't the case.
 
Posted by PSI Teleport (Member # 5545) on :
 
quote:
And yet I suspect bread pudding would be few couples' first choice.
Probably not, but I can think of a couple of good uses for the amaretto sauce.
 
Posted by scifibum (Member # 7625) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Noemon:
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
Fourthed, although I did once have a flourless chocolate expresso torte...

I take it that Mormons can consume things that have coffee in them as long as they aren't liquids? That's interesting; I'd have assumed that that wasn't the case.
Well, she did say "expresso" not "espresso". Could be some other kind of expressed liquid.
 
Posted by MattP (Member # 10495) on :
 
Mormons take the whole eating "sinfully delicious" food thing the extra step of actually sinning while eating it.
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
What do they do, eat and perform onanism?
 
Posted by MattP (Member # 10495) on :
 
quote:
What do they do, eat and perform onanism?
Worse - they eat deserts that contain coffee or alcohol. Sometimes they even neglect to eat meat sparingly.
 
Posted by Jamio (Member # 12053) on :
 
That's what we mean when we say death by chocolate.
 
Posted by Jon Boy (Member # 4284) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sterling:
quote:
Originally posted by PSI Teleport:
Trust me, guys. It's far easier to introduce dessert to the sex, not the other way around.

And yet I suspect bread pudding would be few couples' first choice.
Maybe some couples have bread pudding fetishes.
 
Posted by TheQuestioner (Member # 11747) on :
 
Good stuff
 
Posted by scifibum (Member # 7625) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Orincoro:
...perform onanism?

Dreadfully awkward to phrase it that way, don't you think? I'd prefer "onanize."

That way if you say it out loud people will think you have one thing called an "Ize", or that you misapplied the indefinite article to your eyes.
 
Posted by Icarus (Member # 3162) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sterling:
Entre el "flan" de Espana y el "Ricardo manchado" de Ingles, prefiero el flan, por supuesto.

[Big Grin]
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sterling:
Entre el "flan" de Espana y el "Ricardo manchado" de Ingles, prefiero el flan, por supuesto.

He creido que flan era Mexicano, no?
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by scifibum:
quote:
Originally posted by Orincoro:
...perform onanism?

Dreadfully awkward to phrase it that way, don't you think? I'd prefer "onanize."

That way if you say it out loud people will think you have one thing called an "Ize", or that you misapplied the indefinite article to your eyes.

OH YOUR'RE FUNNY!!! TELL US SOME MORE JOKES FUNNY GUY. HAHAHAHAHA. HAHAHAHA. HAHAHAHA. FUNNY FUNNY GUY YOU ARE!!!!


Seriously- more jokes.
 
Posted by scifibum (Member # 7625) on :
 
"misapplied the indefinite article to your eyes."

This can really happen if you're not careful, you know.
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Noemon:
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
Fourthed, although I did once have a flourless chocolate expresso torte...

I take it that Mormons can consume things that have coffee in them as long as they aren't liquids? That's interesting; I'd have assumed that that wasn't the case.
It's just "hot drinks" with caffeine in them.

Apparently excluding hot chocolate.

Or something.

It's very strangely interpreted.
 
Posted by Sterling (Member # 8096) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Orincoro:
quote:
Originally posted by Sterling:
Entre el "flan" de Espana y el "Ricardo manchado" de Ingles, prefiero el flan, por supuesto.

He creido que flan era Mexicano, no?
Yo no se algo a ciencia cierta. Pero "creme caramel" es una receta vieja de Europa.

historia de flan

quote:
Originally posted by scifibum:
quote:
Originally posted by Orincoro:
...perform onanism?

Dreadfully awkward to phrase it that way, don't you think? I'd prefer "onanize."
Sounds like something you'd do with an onion.

Probably almost as uncomfortable as the things you could do with hot bread pudding...
 
Posted by Icarus (Member # 3162) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Orincoro:
quote:
Originally posted by Sterling:
Entre el "flan" de Espana y el "Ricardo manchado" de Ingles, prefiero el flan, por supuesto.

He creido que flan era Mexicano, no?
No. A los cubanos también nos gusta el flan.
 
Posted by Glenn Arnold (Member # 3192) on :
 
quote:
That's because the way they cook peas, they ARE gloppy goo.
To be precise, they are MUSHY goo. MMMmmmm. Mushy peas. Thanks to June, who taught me to like mushy peas.

Oh, and I've invited June to come to hatrack and explain to us the correct definition of pudding. (SHE's made of Yorkshire)
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Samprimary:
quote:
Originally posted by Noemon:
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
Fourthed, although I did once have a flourless chocolate expresso torte...

I take it that Mormons can consume things that have coffee in them as long as they aren't liquids? That's interesting; I'd have assumed that that wasn't the case.
It's just "hot drinks" with caffeine in them.

Apparently excluding hot chocolate.

Or something.

It's very strangely interpreted.

Not really, it's specific enough that it's spirit is unmistakable, but vague enough that the individual can think for themselves how to live it.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Huh. So I guess you can still have iced tea or just simple chilled tea. Good.
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by BlackBlade:

Not really, it's specific enough that it's spirit is unmistakable, but vague enough that the individual can think for themselves how to live it. [/QB][/QUOTE]

So it's a definite maybe?

That sounds to me like a pretty nice little arrangement.

I would choose to interpret it to mean, "no spicy drinks." Spicy foods would of course be allowed.
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
So I guess you can still have iced tea or just simple chilled tea.

Nope. Not unless it's red "tea" or other non-tea teas.
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
I think that's actually the point Mucus was making, rivka: that it's not really up to individual interpretation.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by TomDavidson:
I think that's actually the point Mucus was making, rivka: that it's not really up to individual interpretation.

No it really is. When I sit down for a temple interview and they ask me if I keep the Word of Wisdom, they do not give me a line by line analysis, they just ask if I am following it. In Sunday school lessons (I've seen on the matter,) they do not try to specifically identify the do's and don'ts. Instead the spirit of the principle is discussed. Can a 350 pound man look at a woman smoking a cigarette and say, "You're going to hell?"

As to Mucus' question, yes I can have iced teas or simple chilled teas depending on their content. I personally think green teas have elements to them that are healthy but also unhealthy, caffeine not being the only undesired part.

I love Dr. Pepper, but even I have to concede that I drink it excessively, perhaps because I am addicted to it. It then falls to me to decide if I am really taking care of my body as well as I ought to.
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by TomDavidson:
I think that's actually the point Mucus was making, rivka: that it's not really up to individual interpretation.

Ah!
 
Posted by Jon Boy (Member # 4284) on :
 
Latter-day Saint leaders have said pretty unequivocally that coffee and tea are against the Word of Wisdom. I assume this is regardless of the temperature at which they are served.

link
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
(Actually, I wasn't trying to make a point. I just read Noemon and Samprimary's interpretations and assumed they were correct (due to BlBl's seeming agreement with them), whereas in the past I was under the impression that as in Jon Boy's current interpretation that tea was right out. Thus I was happy that there is at least some way to enjoy it.

I'm still Chinese enough to appreciate tea and want to share it, hence the "good.")
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
Mucus: All that was considered tea in 1800's America would also be called tea to the Chinese, not all that is called tea by the Chinese is also the tea Joseph Smith spoke of, at least to me and the church organization as instructed by Utah in Taiwan is concerned.

If I could have 冬瓜茶 (winter melon tea) and 麥茶 (wheat tea) in ready supply at all times in my home I would.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Hmmm, confused.

Can you drink any of red tea (hong cha 紅茶), green tea (such as long jing cha, l龙井茶), or pu-erh tea (bolay cha 普洱茶) cold?

Or in other words, are there actually any teas that you cannot drink hot that you can drink cold (or in ice form) or is the temperature simply irrelevant?
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
Mucus: To me, as I understand it, because coffee and tea were virtually the only drinks served hot at that time, the revelation discontinuing their use refers to them as "hot" drinks, whereas alcoholic drinks are referred to as "strong" drinks, rather than naming them specifically.

Originally the revelation was setup as a sort of "advice for those who'll take it," after Joseph Smith's death, Brigham Young (whether through revelation or some other process) deemed it mandatory for full fellowship in the church.

Missionaries in Taiwan, since we had to deal with this question of teas constantly, were instructed to tell the members and investigators that tea made from tea leaves is expressly forbidden, whereas flower, fruit, and grain teas are still OK. In essence the instruction was 有茶葉就不行了 (If it's got tea leaves, it's no good.)

So green and red teas regardless of temperature are prohibited. Coffee is a bit more tricky IMHO, as as far as I am aware, it's the large amounts of caffeine that make it unhealthy.

In anycase, the phrase "hot drinks" to me does not indicate that drinks served hot are bad, rather that coffee and tea are not necessarily good for you, as are many things, and ought to be scrutinized in one's diet.
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:


I'm still waiting for them to bring around the dessert menu that lists sex as one of the options.

If I liked sigs, this would be mine. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Synesthesia (Member # 4774) on :
 
I can't live without tea. I already had to give up coffee...which reminds me. IT'S TEA TIME!
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
BlBl: So if I understand correctly, the temperature thing is only used as short-hand since "hot drinks" was more convenient than "drinks that we normally see as being served hot during this time period such as tea or coffee, regardless of whether they're actually hot when you ingest it"

In other words, there are no current drinks that you can drink cold that you would normally be barred from drinking hot. And it would seem that "new" hot drinks such as ovaltine or hot chocolate which were not commonly present during that time period are in somewhat of an ill-defined state.
 
Posted by aspectre (Member # 2222) on :
 
"I'm still waiting for them to bring around the dessert menu that lists sex as one of the options."

Try Katz's Deli

[ July 23, 2009, 05:21 PM: Message edited by: aspectre ]
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
Does red tea have more than one meaning? Several Mormons have specifically told me that rooibos is permitted.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
There's a mismatch in terms

Under one scheme, the categories are:

code:
English       "Chinese"
----------------------
Black Tea (Hong Cha, literally red tea )
Oolong Tea (Wulong Cha)
Green Tea (Lu Cha, literally green tea)
White Tea (Bai Cha, literally white tea)
Yellow Tea (Huang Cha, literally yellow tea)
Puerh (Hei Cha, literally black tea)
Other (Such as herbal tea)

So actual red tea is what white people would call black tea while rooibos is really just an herbal tea.
 
Posted by TheQuestioner (Member # 11747) on :
 
Snapple rules
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
What about things like orange pekoe? (I'm asking where that falls on your chart, not the Mormon stance, which I'm clear on.)
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
Mucus: Absolutely correct, as far as I am concerned. As you can imagine, tea culture was one of the more difficult road blocks for Chinese converts. I once inadvertently had some 紅茶 with some lemon juice, and it was absolutely fantastic. I was extremely disappointed when it was explained to me that there was tea from leaves in it.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
rivka: If Wikipedia is to be believed, that would be a tea that would be classified as an English black tea or a Chinese red tea.
quote:
... The term Orange Pekoe is used in the tea industry to describe a basic medium grade black tea consisting of many single whole tea leaves of a specific size; however, it is popularly used in some regions (such as North America) to describe any generic black tea, and is often treated as a description for the consumer as though it were a specific variety of black tea.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orange_pekoe

BlackBlade:
Hmmmm. Crummy.
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
*bewildered* Then how is it different from what I buy that says it contains black tea?
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
rivka: If Wikipedia is to be believed, that would be a tea that would be classified as an English black tea or a Chinese red tea.
quote:
... The term Orange Pekoe is used in the tea industry to describe a basic medium grade black tea consisting of many single whole tea leaves of a specific size; however, it is popularly used in some regions (such as North America) to describe any generic black tea, and is often treated as a description for the consumer as though it were a specific variety of black tea.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orange_pekoe

BlackBlade:
Hmmmm. Crummy.

It was more like, "Hmmmmm tangy.....what?! no!!!!"
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Samprimary:
Or something.

It's very strangely interpreted.

one page later ..
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
rivka: It would seem from my reading that Orange pekoe IS "black" tea. But rather than being a type of tea in the normal sense of being grown in a specific area and prepared in a specific way, its just a descriptor for all types of "black" tea leaves of a specific size. If that article is to be believed, its completely outside of Chinese/Japanese classifications as in here http://www.o-cha.net/english/cup/pdf/4.pdf
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
So it's all a marketing lie? There's actually no difference between my orange pekoe and the tea that I have called black tea?

I am shocked! And outraged!

Ok, maybe not. [Wink]
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Well ... it rather depends on what specifically was given to you as black tea. Maybe I'm not being clear.

Let's compare tea to say, soft drinks.
Saying you have black tea might be like saying you have a cola. Saying you have orange pekoe might be like saying you have a diet cola. They both narrow down the field but in different ways and one is contained within the other. (Of course, IANAE)
 
Posted by aspectre (Member # 2222) on :
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_tea disambiguation
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
You guys have wondered way way off topic. What does tea have to do with pudding or even dessert? I guess I've seen green tea flavored sorbet, but its hard to think of that as a real dessert.

I guess I should add that there is no real consensus among Mormons about whether using alcohol in cooking or coffee as a flavoring in desserts and candies violates the Word of Wisdom. I am unaware of any official position on the issues and opinions are all over the map.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
... What does tea have to do with pudding or even dessert? I guess I've seen green tea flavored sorbet, but its hard to think of that as a real dessert.

I don't know how we got here, but thats just wrong.

Not only on the narrow issue of green tea is there green tea ice cream in normal form or in bar form. In fact, in China McDonald's sells a green tea+green bean sundae.

More generally, bubble tea of various forms, some containing real tea and some not is very very big business.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
You guys have wondered way way off topic.

I would say this is an epic off topic wandering.
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:

I guess I should add that there is no real consensus among Mormons about whether using alcohol in cooking or coffee as a flavoring in desserts and candies violates the Word of Wisdom. I am unaware of any official position on the issues and opinions are all over the map.

In that case I guess I'd go ahead and cook myself an olive in a nice glass of vodka, and maybe later I'd flavor a cube of sugar by dumping it in a cup of coffee. Problem solved.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
... What does tea have to do with pudding or even dessert? I guess I've seen green tea flavored sorbet, but its hard to think of that as a real dessert.

I don't know how we got here, but thats just wrong.

Not only on the narrow issue of green tea is there green tea ice cream in normal form or in bar form. In fact, in China McDonald's sells a green tea+green bean sundae.

More generally, bubble tea of various forms, some containing real tea and some not is very very big business.

I don't think Mcdonalds was offering that sundae while I was in Taiwan, but maybe they were, I'm not surprised at all that they offer it. Bubble tea looks positively disgusting and zhu zhu beads are just gross.

I don't know why at least the Taiwanese think red and green bean tastes good with everything, I've said it before, it's like eating soil straight up.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
Bubble tea works like this (IMHO):

First time trying it: "Wow, this is weird. I don't really like it."

One week later: Unbearable craving for bubble tea

Rest of your life: Hooked on bubble tea
 
Posted by scifibum (Member # 7625) on :
 
I know lots of Mormons who love tiramisu. They tend to get a sort of blank look on their face when I tell them it has coffee in it. I think they are trying to erase their short term memory. (For some of these Mormons I think they haven't decided that coffee in a dessert is OK, rather they've decided not to think about it too much. Which I'm totally fine with. It's hard enough for the poor folks.)

Anyway I've never known a Mormon to be so hardcore as to refuse to use flavoring extracts containing ethanol in their cooking.

I do wonder why those extracts are an exception to the rule for alcohol content (meaning liquor law- and retail sale-wise, no longer talking about LDS). I'm not sure if the concentrated oils qualify to "denature" the alcohol and whether they'd be harmful (barring allergies).
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
It would take a pretty severe alcohol addiction to find vanilla extract remotely drinkable.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by BlackBlade:
I don't think Mcdonalds was offering that sundae while I was in Taiwan, but maybe they were, I'm not surprised at all that they offer it.

I think it might be a bit of a recent innovation. From what I've read, McDonald's, KFC, and the like were finding that after the novelty of their initial entry (as a taste of the Western world) into these markets started to wear off, that they have to adapt in order to compete by offering more local foods and flavours.

quote:
Bubble tea looks positively disgusting and zhu zhu beads are just gross.
Don't have to get the beads, they have various jellies now. Best is lychee, IMHO. Its like a whole genre of foods now and saying that you don't like bubble tea is almost like saying you don't like "cake." Technically possible, but pretty unlikely ... and a touch insane [Wink]

quote:
I don't know why at least the Taiwanese think red and green bean tastes good with everything, I've said it before, it's like eating soil straight up.
Green bean would be not so good. Its normally green *tea* and red bean. And it does taste good with many things. Like, yo

I think part of the problem is that most Western desserts are sickly sweet. This is in fact, not required.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
scifibum: I know you used to be a Mormon, and subsequently it's easier for you to pity us who still are, but I wouldn't say living the Word of Wisdom has made my life very difficult or that somebody ought to see me and think, "poor guy." It's weird but I actually think about rivka almost everytime I eat pork, and think, "I wonder if she knows what she's missing." But then I think, "Probably not, but there is more than enough good food out there that we both can enjoy."

I don't spend alot of time worrying if my food is OK to eat. Certainly not as much as rivka, but I doubt either of us are having a particular hard time living our normal lives.
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by rivka:
It would take a pretty severe alcohol addiction to find vanilla extract remotely drinkable.

My sister used to pour vanilla extract into hot cocoa- she was only like ten. I doubt she knew there was even booze in it.
 
Posted by scifibum (Member # 7625) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by BlackBlade:
scifibum: I know you used to be a Mormon, and subsequently it's easier for you to pity us who still are, but I wouldn't say living the Word of Wisdom has made my life very difficult or that somebody ought to see me and think, "poor guy." It's weird but I actually think about rivka almost everytime I eat pork, and think, "I wonder if she knows what she's missing." But then I think, "Probably not, but there is more than enough good food out there that we both can enjoy."

I don't spend alot of time worrying if my food is OK to eat. Certainly not as much as rivka, but I doubt either of us are having a particular hard time living our normal lives.

Good point. I can drink a beer or have a cup of coffee and be glad that I can enjoy it, but that doesn't necessarily translate into a poorer life for the lack of those particular indulgences.

What I do think is true, however, is that it's not my place or anyone's to nitpick at their personal interpretation of the legitimately gray areas.

So I retract the pity, but stand by the "hey, let them handle tiramisu however they want" stance. [Smile]
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
... What does tea have to do with pudding or even dessert? I guess I've seen green tea flavored sorbet, but its hard to think of that as a real dessert.

I don't know how we got here, but thats just wrong.

Not only on the narrow issue of green tea is there green tea ice cream in normal form or in bar form. In fact, in China McDonald's sells a green tea+green bean sundae.

More generally, bubble tea of various forms, some containing real tea and some not is very very big business.

Like I said before, these just aren't real desserts. I'm sorry but they just aren't. They are sort of an asianified perversion of desserts. It's like some one finally noticed that most asian cuisines are really lacking in the dessert arena so they are trying to take good western desserts and add an asian twist and failing pitifully.
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
Dude, uncool. Green tea iced cream and bubble tea are good. Lay off holmes.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
The Rabbit: I'm pretty sure we were eating desserts when you guys were still banging together rocks and bearskins. I'd say that its actually the West which has perverted desserts [Razz]
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by scifibum:
quote:
Originally posted by BlackBlade:
scifibum: I know you used to be a Mormon, and subsequently it's easier for you to pity us who still are, but I wouldn't say living the Word of Wisdom has made my life very difficult or that somebody ought to see me and think, "poor guy." It's weird but I actually think about rivka almost everytime I eat pork, and think, "I wonder if she knows what she's missing." But then I think, "Probably not, but there is more than enough good food out there that we both can enjoy."

I don't spend alot of time worrying if my food is OK to eat. Certainly not as much as rivka, but I doubt either of us are having a particular hard time living our normal lives.

Good point. I can drink a beer or have a cup of coffee and be glad that I can enjoy it, but that doesn't necessarily translate into a poorer life for the lack of those particular indulgences.

What I do think is true, however, is that it's not my place or anyone's to nitpick at their personal interpretation of the legitimately gray areas.

So I retract the pity, but stand by the "hey, let them handle tiramisu however they want" stance. [Smile]

Thanks. [Smile] I completely agree with the tiramisu.
 
Posted by scifibum (Member # 7625) on :
 
What makes something a "real dessert", Rabbit?
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
The Rabbit: I'm pretty sure we were eating desserts when you guys were still banging together rocks and bearskins. I'd say that its actually the West which has perverted desserts [Razz]

Psh, no way. You guys simply refuse to move beyond munching on leafs.
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
You both have fair points.

Clearly asian/western fusion is the only way to go after all.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by BlackBlade:
Psh, no way. You guys simply refuse to move beyond munching on leafs.

Ok, that is one dessert "innovation" the West has on us. While we still make desserts mostly from plants, you guys have developed the meat cake.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
quote:
Originally posted by BlackBlade:
Psh, no way. You guys simply refuse to move beyond munching on leafs.

Ok, that is one dessert "innovation" the West has on us. While we still make desserts mostly from plants, you guys have developed the meat cake.
I nearly threw up my lunch looking at those pictures Mucus. [Angst]

Once I found out the icing was mashed potatoes something clicked and I didn't feel so sick.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by scifibum:
What makes something a "real dessert", Rabbit?

Taste!!!


quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
The Rabbit: I'm pretty sure we were eating desserts when you guys were still banging together rocks and bearskins. I'd say that its actually the West which has perverted desserts [Razz]

Oh, then pray tell me why I can't think of one really good Chinese or Japanese dessert? Why is it that none of the dessert you find on the menu at a chinese restaurant or Japanese restaurant are actually Chinese or Japanese? Explain why it is that French and Viennese pastry shops are opening on ever street corner in Japan but red bean cakes and sticky rice balls just haven"t really caught on in the west?

India and Thailand do have some tasty sweets, but I"ve always figured that was due to the British influence.
 
Posted by scifibum (Member # 7625) on :
 
You have a bigoted palate, Rabbit.

[Wink]
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by scifibum:
You have a bigoted palate, Rabbit.

[Wink]

Only when it comes to dessert. I find it odd that China and Japan have developed so many truly wonderful foods and yet not one single excellent dessert. And don't think I haven't looked.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
Oh, then pray tell me why I can't think of one really good Chinese or Japanese dessert? Why is it that none of the dessert you find on the menu at a chinese restaurant or Japanese restaurant are actually Chinese or Japanese?

Thats basically an argument from ignorance. In fact, if you're at a Chinese restaurant where none of the desserts are actually Chinese then thats probably a sign you're at a restaurant for Westerners. In which case, you may as well ask why you can't think of a non-greasy or non-fried Chinese food.

In fact, in a proper Chinese restaurant the default dessert provided at the end of a dinner is usually red bean based and it should have any number of other desserts based upon red bean, green tea (as BlBl noted), tofu, taro, or lotus. And increasingly, bubble tea at the establishments more aimed at youth.

Heck, we have a very popular holiday that is effectively devoted to cake.

quote:
Explain why it is that French and Viennese pastry shops are opening on ever street corner in Japan but red bean cakes and sticky rice balls just haven"t really caught on in the west?
You're missing a critical difference in culture. Westerners, particularly North Americans, are notably provincial eating only from a small variety of foods. Asians, particularly the Cantonese, are cosmopolitan and will eat pretty much anything once (and dine out often).

There is a statistic in today's news that show that Chinese consumers in Canada spend roughly 25% more on groceries despite shopping in Asian supermarkets which are usually cheaper per item. There is a similar result for dining out as well.

We're simply that much more into eating good food and a big variety of it.
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
quote:
Thats basically an argument from ignorance.
Those are the best kind! [Wink]
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
Rabbit: You need to account for the fact that the cultural revolution absolutely devastated Chinese cuisine. Many many dishes that were absolutely unique were completely lost from memory. Only the very popular and more generally appealing dishes have survived. Even in Taiwan, where many dishes have survived, that knowledge is being lost as children do not wish to follow in the culinary footsteps of their fathers.

Furthermore, you need to understand that the Chinese do not have as much of a fixation on sugar as other cultures do. That disinterest strongly informs their dessert options. One of my favorite things to do as a missionary was to get mini recess peanut butter cups from America and give them to children. They thought they were absolutely disgusting, far too much sweetness, the found it astounding that I could eat several at a time, with no apparent ill effect.

At a formal meal, there simply was no room for dessert. Food after food would be brought out, and it was the diversity that was important. Even when discussing the meal, saying, "MMMM this is so good!" does not carry nearly as much weight as, "My goodness, the variety at your table is so extensive!" As a matter of fact the phrase a host or hostess will use to traditionally denigrate the meal and provide you the opportunity to compliment them is "沒什麽蔡" (There's no vegetables). Meat is a sign of wealth in Chinese cooking, extensive and creative use of vegetables is a sign of prowess and adeptness.

But I'll confess, I'm biased against desserts, I just don't really eat them much.

edit: If you're interested. The movie "Eat Drink Man Woman" by Ang Lee (of Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon and Brokeback Mountain) fame, demonstrates traditional Chinese family dynamics, with a specific emphasis on Chinese cuisine. It's one of the best movies ever made IMHO, and the ending is probably the only ending that chokes me up with happiness every time. The food is almost pornographic in it's appeal.
 
Posted by adenam (Member # 11902) on :
 
What about fortune cookies?

Those are good.
 
Posted by Tuukka (Member # 12124) on :
 
In my experience desserts in general don't belong to Far-East food cultures. I've been to Japan, South-Korea, China, HK, Malaysia and Cambodia, and in none of those places desserts were ever offered. I dined with local people fairly often, and never saw a dessert on the table.

You might get a non-sweet soup or something similar in the end, but I wouldn't qualify that as a "dessert" anymore than the vodka shot in Russia.
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by adenam:
What about fortune cookies?

quote:
Wikipedia says:

The cookies are mostly unknown in mainland China or Taiwan.


 
Posted by adenam (Member # 11902) on :
 
I knew they were too good to be real Chinese food.
 
Posted by Sterling (Member # 8096) on :
 
Didn't someone post that video a while back that attested they were actually a Japanese-American creation?
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortune_cookies#Origin
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
You're missing a critical difference in culture. Westerners, particularly North Americans, are notably provincial eating only from a small variety of foods. Asians, particularly the Cantonese, are cosmopolitan and will eat pretty much anything once (and dine out often).

We're simply that much more into eating good food and a big variety of it.

I've come to expect this kind of cultural chauvinism from you, however this generalization doesn't at all match my experience, either as a North American native or a European resident.

Yeah, yeah, you can find people in Idaho who never eat at ethnic restaurants or even have them available. I bet you could find plenty of people in China who don't have much of a worldly palette either. Seriously, how can you experience the world and actually believe crap like this? It's just blatantly fallacious.

I suppose it does no good reminding you that such a remark made by a Caucasian like myself about people in Asia would be dismissed as narrow minded and simplistic, not to mention *slightly* above my actual ability to demonstrate as even being generally valid. You wouldn't even give Americans who have lived in Asia the benefit of the doubt if they said something like this, because they'd be as wrong as you are. This all doesn't upset me too much, I'm just saddened that you find this kind of disparagement acceptable. By extension, I find this passive-aggressively racist type of remark, which is all too common, to be really disappointing, and I wish that Americans as a whole were less accepting of it.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I couldn't tell whether you were being sarcastic or not, but quite frankly, I thought his statement was pretty accurate. (I'm a North American).
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Orincoro:
I've come to expect this kind of cultural chauvinism from you, however this generalization doesn't at all match my experience, either as a North American native or a European resident.

You can call it whatever you want, but I'm sorry that reality doesn't match your wishes. On the most superficial level, you can simply wander into your local Chinese supermarket. If its anything like the ones in Canada, you'll find a bewildering array of seafood, meats, vegetables, and pre-prepared food that you'll never find in normal supermarkets. Businesses are already beyond this and know to focus on us as a group.

After all, we spend more on food...
quote:
Loblaw is targeting a market whose households spend up to 23 per cent more on groceries than others in Canada, according to data last year.

They are members of the fast-growing South Asian and Chinese Canadian communities, and they account for about one-third – or $5.7-billion – of grocery spending in Toronto and Vancouver, a study last year by market researcher Solutions Research Group found.

It found that South Asian Canadians spend $154 a week on their groceries, or 23 per cent more than an average household in Toronto and Vancouver.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/loblaw-buys-asian-grocery-chain/article1229762/

And we dine out more ...
quote:
Consumers in Asia dine out more frequently than others, but in Hong Kong in particular, nearly one-third eat at a restaurant one or more times every day. Europeans were least likely to go out for a meal, with the Dutch most likely to eat out less than once a month at 57 percent.
http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/what-global-restaurant-diners-want/

There's really not a lot to it. Plus the dark side of this has gotten plenty of press, lots of new pressure on global seafood, high inflation on food prices, even the world's most expensive truffles end up in Hong Kong. link
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sterling:
Didn't someone post that video a while back that attested they were actually a Japanese-American creation?

Yep. Me. [Big Grin]

http://www.hatrack.com/cgi-bin/ubbmain/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=054505
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Orincoro:
quote:
Originally posted by rivka:
It would take a pretty severe alcohol addiction to find vanilla extract remotely drinkable.

My sister used to pour vanilla extract into hot cocoa- she was only like ten. I doubt she knew there was even booze in it.
How much? Anywhere from 1/4 tsp. to a whole teaspoon would probably enhance the taste of a standard-size cup of cocoa. Much more than that would be nasty.

An entire 1 oz. bottle (the most common size, although it comes in 2 oz. and larger sizes too) of vanilla contains less alcohol than a shot of vodka. Less than or similar to the amount in a shot (1.5 oz) of most liqueurs -- extracts are typically 35% alcohol, and liqueurs range from about 20-45%, no?

Now, downing the super-family-size 12-oz. bottle is another story altogether.
 
Posted by Synesthesia (Member # 4774) on :
 
Wait, does that mean if you're mormon you can't use real vanilla es tract?
That's the good stuff.
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
quote:
Originally posted by Orincoro:
I've come to expect this kind of cultural chauvinism from you, however this generalization doesn't at all match my experience, either as a North American native or a European resident.

You can call it whatever you want, but I'm sorry that reality doesn't match your wishes.
I said "experiences." I won't talk to you at all if you're gonna play that kind of game.


quote:
If its anything like the ones in Canada, you'll find a bewildering array of seafood, meats, vegetables, and pre-prepared food that you'll never find in normal supermarkets. Businesses are already beyond this and know to focus on us as a group.
Serious question: How many countries have you lived in? Because the blanket assertion here, that I'm seeing, is that Asians eat more variety or are more worldly in their tastes based on a certain kind of supermarket? Your generalization doesn't work for me straight off the bat- I shop in Asian markets too- I shop in one at Vytony almost every day!

Firstly, please, Asian supermarkets exist outside of Asia to service Asians and other people who want Asian products (and by the way, contrary to your assertions, I shop in Vietnamese, Korean and Japanese supermarkets all the time to get the basic things I'm used to eating from California). These stores are obviously a special case. Aside from that, I have shopped in "American" grocery stores across Europe, and they stand apart from local groceries in their variety, not to mention their prices. Big fat surprise. Your argument that Asians actually eat better food (from a qualitative standpoint, not one of health standards or nutrition) because it costs more? Please give me a break. You're basing that assertion off of groceries in Canada- how in the world do you expect that to sound like convincing evidence of anything at all?

I'm not arguing against Asian food or even anything Asian at all, mind you. I'm arguing against the idea that you can generalize or deduce anything useful out of a west v. east set of postulates, especially when you base them on your own experiences, plus a couple of dubious anecdotes about one type of food costing more- which btw, says nothing about asians being "cosmopolitan" when it comes to non-Asian foods. I'm sure many Asians *are* cosmopolitan, but you're going to have one hell of a time providing evidence that that's a general state of affairs anywhere- your assumptions are artifacts of your own experiences, and I simply object to your assumption that you know enough to make such conclusions. I assure you, you do not.

Look, I could provide a bunch of anecdotes to "prove" something about any country. I'm in Paris at the moment, and on my street there is a Chinese grocery, two french grocers, a high end butcher shop, two produce markets, a fish shop, an italian restaurant, two french restaurants, a bottle shop (wine mostly), a bakery, a cheese shop, a desert shop, two cafes and a handful of convenient stores- all of them have huge and surprisingly varied selections for such small places. On the weekends there is a farmer's market under the metro platforms that sells an ungodly assortment of meets, cheeses, prepared foods, candies, produce, fish, sauces, etc. It's really an incredible place to live if you're looking for food. I've shopped in all these places in the past two weeks, and had a varied and interesting diet. Have you been here? Have you seen it? No? Have you been to every country in Europe, every city in America, every neighborhood with its unique variety of offerings? No? Then you don't know what you're talking about. Anyone who claims to know crap like that is full of it himself.

[ July 24, 2009, 08:18 PM: Message edited by: Orincoro ]
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Synesthesia:
Wait, does that mean if you're mormon you can't use real vanilla es tract?

IIRC, it varies.

Anyway, they could always use vanilla beans instead.
 
Posted by Jamio (Member # 12053) on :
 
Once, in a dim sum shop, I bought a round, flat dumpling filled with a black bean paste that was quite sweet. And very tasty. I have also had bao that was filled with a struesel-like substance that reminded me of, for some reason, of pineapple. I don't know how authentic these foods were, but my Chinese relations liked them well enough.
 
Posted by Synesthesia (Member # 4774) on :
 
IIRC?

I think the booze evaporates with heat anyway.

DANG IT! If I had a jar of jelly out all night, (This all fruit stuff) can I still eat it?
Plus it's cold in here and this stuff is 2.39!
 
Posted by maui babe (Member # 1894) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Synesthesia:
.

DANG IT! If I had a jar of jelly out all night, (This all fruit stuff) can I still eat it?
Plus it's cold in here and this stuff is 2.39!

Jelly does fine without refrigeration. The pH and water activity are both low enough in most jellies to prevent any microbial growth.
 
Posted by Glenn Arnold (Member # 3192) on :
 
Jelly and Jam are known as "preserves." I wonder why?
 
Posted by Jamio (Member # 12053) on :
 
Doctrine and Covenants Section 89, or the Word of Wisdom, says of alcohol and coffee 1)Wine should only be used for the Sacrement, 2)When it is used, it should be "of your own make", 3)"Strong drinks" are for external use only, 4)"Hot drinks" are not to be drunk.

That "hot drinks" refer to coffee and tea made from the tea plant is something that came from a later revelation. The total prohibition of alcoholic beverages, I was told although I do not have any references, came into effect because there was at one time a fashion among the saints of neglecting their tithes in order to maintain their wine cellars.

It's a bit of a stretch to call vanilla extract either strong in alcohol or a drink.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Orincoro: They're not personal anecdotes. They're studies drawing conclusions based on surveys and statistics. I'm sorry that your background has ill-prepared you to handle the difference.

It would be useful to understand that if a person says something like Americans use more gasoline than Europeans, it does not mean that each and every American uses more gasoline than each and every European. And one doesn't have to personally visit every single country and every neighborhood to verify that. One simply has to look at the data, its right there in the links, stats on international food preferences.

But I tire of you and your narrow-focus on getting offended by my statements out of context. Indeed, even this time I said that the supermarket example is merely "the most superficial level" before going onto the actual data.

If you're seeking to be offended, I won't stand in your way. In fact, I may even encourage it as a good way to release your emotions and whatever problems that are really bothering you.
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
Orincoro: They're not personal anecdotes. They're studies drawing conclusions based on surveys and statistics. I'm sorry that your background has ill-prepared you to handle the difference.

It would be useful to understand that if a person says something like Americans use more gasoline than Europeans, it does not mean that each and every American uses more gasoline than each and every European. And one doesn't have to personally visit every single country and every neighborhood to verify that. One simply has to look at the data, its right there in the links, stats on international food preferences.

But I tire of you and your narrow-focus on getting offended by my statements out of context. Indeed, even this time I said that the supermarket example is merely "the most superficial level" before going onto the actual data.

If you're seeking to be offended, I won't stand in your way. In fact, I may even encourage it as a good way to release your emotions and whatever problems that are really bothering you.

Spare me please, I don't need your condescension or your false magnanimity. I'm responding to the conclusion *you* drew, which was that Asians are more cosmopolitan in their tastes than westerners. None of what you cited addresses that- the gasoline analogy doesn't fit for that conclusion. It's an unprovable hypothesis, and the generalization serves no useful purpose other than to reinforce, once again, your cultural chauvinism.
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Glenn Arnold:
Jelly and Jam are known as "preserves." I wonder why?

*ponders*

Don't tell me. I know this one!
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
:::spoilers:::

preserve |priˈzərv|
verb [ trans. ]

• prepare (fruit) for long-term storage by boiling it with sugar : [as adj. ] ( preserved) those sweet preserved fruits associated with Cremona.


noun
1 (usu. preserves) food made with fruit preserved in sugar, such as jam or marmalade : home-made preserves.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Orincoro:
... It's an unprovable hypothesis, and the generalization serves no useful purpose other than to reinforce, once again, your cultural chauvinism.

Again, your inability to conceive of a way to measure it does not mean there actually is not a way. In fact, its already been done.

Plus, I never actually said it was a useful conclusion. Its just the truth.

What is more interesting is your assumption that I find it useful which probably means that you're assigning some personal significance to this comparison, which is beyond me.

In short, I'd like ask you: what's eating you?
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:

Plus, I never actually said it was a useful conclusion. Its just the truth.

:snort: Whatever. Keep baiting me with your ad hominems- it's very effective at proving that your opinion is "the truth." Go read some Theodor Adorno- you'd love him.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
*shrug* The record shows that I've provided proof for my assertions while you have not.

In fact, while I've been speaking in generalities which say little about my own eating habits, you've gone out of your way to detail "your" shopping habits and what "you've" eaten. While its pleasing that you seek validation (and thats a good thing), it highlights that you're taking this on a much more personal level than I am. As does, well, your insults.

I'm confident that if you take some time to consider, you'll realize that your beef is really not with me but with yourself. I'll leave you to it.
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
Again, stop condescending to me, and stop offering your false magnanimity. Your assertions about my state of mind are both incorrect and unwelcome- spare me your attempts at manipulation.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jamio:
... I have also had bao that was filled with a struesel-like substance that reminded me of, for some reason, of pineapple.

This may or may not be "chicken tail" bao. For some reason, it usually tastes like pineapple to me, but I'm told its actually coconut. (It should be fairly new)
 
Posted by King of Men (Member # 6684) on :
 
quote:
One of my favorite things to do as a missionary was to get mini recess peanut butter cups from America and give them to children. They thought they were absolutely disgusting, far too much sweetness, the found it astounding that I could eat several at a time, with no apparent ill effect.
This being so, why was that a favourite thing? Did you follow up by pointing out the Bible verse where it's said that the faithful shall be able to drink poison without ill effect? I can see where that would be pretty convincing to someone being exposed to American candy for the first time.
 
Posted by Azile (Member # 2312) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Tuukka:
In my experience desserts in general don't belong to Far-East food cultures. I've been to Japan, South-Korea, China, HK, Malaysia and Cambodia, and in none of those places desserts were ever offered. I dined with local people fairly often, and never saw a dessert on the table.

You might get a non-sweet soup or something similar in the end, but I wouldn't qualify that as a "dessert" anymore than the vodka shot in Russia.

I'm Chinese-American, with parents who grew up in Cambodia. You probably haven't seen many desserts because they aren't typically offered in a conventional western sense-- in companion to a meal. At least in my experience, "desserts" are mostly eaten as snacks. When my family and I dine in an Asian (Chinese, Vietnamese, Thai and Cambodian places in the LA) restaurant for lunch or dinner, we rarely accompany the meal with a dessert. In many Asian cultures, desserts aren't so much a course in a meal, but simply a category of food... and it's definitely a big part of any Asian food culture that I've encountered.

Here are just a few of the obvious examples of the desserts. [Smile]

Chinese/Taiwanese/Hong Kong:
Shaved Ice
Moon Cakes
Egg Tart
Buns with Sweet Paste
Rice Cakes
Diversity of Dessert Soups

Vietnamese:
Congee Desserts
Dessert Drinks with Coconut Milk
Black Rice With Shredded Coconut Ex 2
Miscellaneous

Cambodian/Thai:
Fried Bananas
Mango Sticky Rice
Durian Sticky Rice
Banana Leaf Banana Rice
 
Posted by PSI Teleport (Member # 5545) on :
 
Zomg. I've been meaning to make some sticky rice and mango. You, good sir/ma'am, have just encouraged me to do so.

To everyone else in this thread, BOO to all of you. BOO because you have access to cool supermarkets and Asian food and French markets and...stuff. Fort Worth, Texas is the least cosmopolitan city in the universe, and I don't need evidence to back that up. In fact, I refuse to go look for it.

*sulks*
 
Posted by MattP (Member # 10495) on :
 
quote:
In short, I'd like ask you: what's eating you?
Probably an Asian. Westerners are generally too culinarily timid for Orincoro meat.
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MattP:
quote:
In short, I'd like ask you: what's eating you?
Probably an Asian. Westerners are generally too culinarily timid for Orincoro meat.
I look appetizing, but I'm pretty tough and gamy- of course, savage westerners just cover me with honey and barbecue and sweet and sour sauce because unlike Asians, they are barbarians with no culinary tradition or taste. :nod:
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Knowing is half the battle
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
Orincoro: They're not personal anecdotes. They're studies drawing conclusions based on surveys and statistics. I'm sorry that your background has ill-prepared you to handle the difference.

Mucus, If you are actually referring to studies on the topic, can you please provide a reference. So far, all you have provided are assertions and anecdotes many of which are not consistent with my personal experience. I would very much like to see the details of the studies to which you refer. Those details make a big difference. Were they comparing Western vs. chinese diet in 2000, 1950 or 1600. Were they comparing Hong Kong with Boise Idaho, or Hong Kong with Paris and New York. How did they define variety? For example, would the 100 different kinds of cheese available at the Muenster Farmers market be considered "cheese" or 100 different things. It would be very easy to define variety in a way that is highly culturally biased.

Your Asian grocery example demonstrates this very clearly. I shop routinely at Asian markets because I use many of the gluten free flours I use (rice, tapioca, potato etc) are more readily there and I cook commonly with Asian spices and vegetables. I will agree that you can find a large variety of things in an Asian grocery that you won't find in a good generally American grocery store. But I could also list hundreds of items that you won't find in an Asian grocery that are routinely available in a good American grocery store. For example, the fruit selection in Asian groceries is generally abysmal. Cheeses and cured meats aren't available at all. Grocery stores in the Western US will generally carry at least a dozen different types of hot peppers, I typically find only 1 at asian groceries. There are some spices and seasoning that I can find only at an Asian grocer and others that simply are not available at Asian stores. On the other hand, I can get 5 or six different kinds of eggplant at the Asian grocery, but I've never seen more than 2 at the regular grocery.

Please, give us your references so I can check and see what has actually been studied.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
Oh, then pray tell me why I can't think of one really good Chinese or Japanese dessert? Why is it that none of the dessert you find on the menu at a chinese restaurant or Japanese restaurant are actually Chinese or Japanese?

Thats basically an argument from ignorance. In fact, if you're at a Chinese restaurant where none of the desserts are actually Chinese then that's probably a sign you're at a restaurant for Westerners. In which case, you may as well ask why you can't think of a non-greasy or non-fried Chinese food.
You are making an entirely incorrect assumption. I am very well traveled and have eaten in very authentic Chinese and Japanese restaurants in those countries. I also have good friends from both Taiwan and the main land who cook for me frequently.

quote:
In fact, in a proper Chinese restaurant the default dessert provided at the end of a dinner is usually red bean based and it should have any number of other desserts based upon red bean, green tea (as BlBl noted), tofu, taro, or lotus. And increasingly, bubble tea at the establishments more aimed at youth.
Yup, I've had them and they just aren't very good. Yeah, I know that's an objective opinion but I think you will observe its a pretty wide spread objective opinion. I've also been informed by several chinese friends that serving any dessert with a Chinese meal is non-traditional and reflects Western influence. A traditional chinese meal is conclude with soup, not a sweet dish. Sweets were something eaten as "snacks" and very rarely as part of a meal.


quote:
Heck, we have a very popular holiday that is effectively devoted to cake.
I've had steamed rice cakes. I'm still waiting for a single example of a really good Chinese dessert

quote:
Explain why it is that French and Viennese pastry shops are opening on ever street corner in Japan but red bean cakes and sticky rice balls just haven"t really caught on in the west?
You're missing a critical difference in culture. Westerners, particularly North Americans, are notably provincial eating only from a small variety of foods. Asians, particularly the Cantonese, are cosmopolitan and will eat pretty much anything once (and dine out often).[/quote]

That's just nonsense as an answer to the question at hand. Chinese restaurants are popular in virtually every town in the US with a population over 1000. If the town is big enough to have a restaurant, it nearly always has a chinese restaurant. It may not be that authentic, but I wouldn't argue that most of the french pastry shops in Tokyo were very authentic either. There is no shortage of Asian food or Asian restaurants in the US -- what there is a shortage of are Asian desserts. If Asian sweets are really that terrific, why aren't they available in the US and Europe when virtually every other kind of Asian restaurant is ubiquitous in the west? It's just silly to claim this is because Americans have very narrow provincial tastes and Asians do not. In my experience, with the one exception of desserts, western restaurants are not nearly as common in Asia and Asian restaurants are in the west.

[ July 26, 2009, 08:28 AM: Message edited by: The Rabbit ]
 
Posted by fugu13 (Member # 2859) on :
 
Rabbit: try reading the thread, such as the links he already provided that make direct reference to the marketing studies involved. And we shouldn't be surprised they don't match your own experience since

1) you are outside the norm in many ways

and

2) the numbers found by the marketing studies are trends and tendencies, not hard and fast rules about how everyone behaves.

edit: I should also say I think you're both mostly talking past each other. It is entirely possible for urban populations in China and Japan to both dine out and enjoy a greater variety of food and to not have originated any particularly great desserts. For instance. So why one keeps being raised as a counterpoint to the other, I'm not really sure. (And that Japanese urban residents dine out more I have absolutely no doubts about; there's a reason Tokyo did so amazingly well when Michelin went there.)

still edit: variety is a much trickier question, though. I saw two actual western restaurants in the Kansai region when visiting Osaka (and a day in Kyoto) for a week recently. One was a German restaurant (tucked behind a shrine in Osaka), and one was an English pub (on the outskirts of the Kyoto tourist district). Every other "western" restaurant was an entirely predictable malaise of pseudo-western dishes, much like Chinese restaurants tend to be in the US. Of course, the Japanese and other asian restaurants had an incredible variety of food, but an appreciation for variety in western food (beyond cute drinks in cafes) was not in evidence. Finding sweet desserts wasn't a problem; most were takes on sundaes and other ice cream desserts.

[ July 26, 2009, 07:15 AM: Message edited by: fugu13 ]
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
Rabbit: try reading the thread, such as the links he already provided that make direct reference to the marketing studies involved. And we shouldn't be surprised they don't match your own experience since

1) you are outside the norm in many ways

and

2) the numbers found by the marketing studies are trends and tendencies, not hard and fast rules about how everyone behaves.

Fugu, No need to be so condescending. If there is someplace where I have actually argued that my experience doesn't support the statistics please point it out. I believe all I've argued is that my experience does not match the anecdotal evidence Mucus has used to support his interpretation of the statistics.

Unless I've missed something, which is possible, mucus linked to two articles. One of which quoted data indicating that Asians in Canada spend 23% more on groceries than the average Canadian and the other of which reported that Asians eat out more than Americans and Europeans. Neither article supports mucus' broad contention that Asians are more cosmopolitan in their tastes. There are numerous explanations for this other than those suggested by mucus. For example, I'm not sure about Canada, but in the US Asians have higher average household incomes than other groups which might easily explain why they spend more on average on food. According to my students from Malaysia, Indonesia, India and Thailand, its common in southeast asian cities for people to eat out because they have no kitchen in their homes (apartments). The fact that they eat many or most of their meals out reflects differences in living conditions that have little to do with having more cosmopolitan tastes.

quote:
edit: I should also say I think you're both mostly talking past each other. It is entirely possible for urban populations in China and Japan to both dine out and enjoy a greater variety of food and to not have originated any particularly great desserts. For instance. So why one keeps being raised as a counterpoint to the other, I'm not really sure.
You don't seem to have been following the progress of the argument. I pointed out that European/Western style desserts have become quite popular in Asia while the converse is not true. Mucus argued that this had nothing to do with the actual preference for Western dessert over Asian desserts but simply that Asians had more cosmopolitan diverse eating habits. This explanation falls flat on two counts, first Mucus has failed to provide any convincing evidence that Asians have more cosmopolitan eating habits and second it is inconsistent with the fact that asian cuisines (other than sweets) are enormously popular in the US, Canada and Europe.

quote:
And that Japanese urban residents dine out more I have absolutely no doubts about; there's a reason Tokyo did so amazingly well when Michelin went there.)
Dine out more than who? I have absolutely no doubts that residents of Manhattan dine out more than residents of Bozeman MT and residents of Paris dine out far more than residents of Metz.

As a side note, I worked with a graduate students from Beijing who after completing his doctorate went to work in Manhattan. About a year later I saw him at a conference and asked him how he liked New York. His comment was that he loved the food. He said that in Chinese cities, you typically only get cuisine from that region, but in Manhattan you could find restaurants specializing in cuisine from every region of China and all other parts of the world as well. There may be some cities in Asia that are like that too, but it is no more correct to conclude that most Japanese have very cosmopolitan tastes because Tokyo is a very cosmopolitan city than it would be to claim that most American eat little but potatoes and barbeque.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by rivka:
quote:
Originally posted by Synesthesia:
Wait, does that mean if you're mormon you can't use real vanilla es tract?

IIRC, it varies.

Anyway, they could always use vanilla beans instead.

I don't know a single mormon who interprets the Word of Wisdom so strictly that they won't eat food flavored with vanilla extract or use extracts and flavorings that contain alcohol. That doesn't mean there aren't any, but they are certainly extremely unusual.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by King of Men:
quote:
One of my favorite things to do as a missionary was to get mini recess peanut butter cups from America and give them to children. They thought they were absolutely disgusting, far too much sweetness, the found it astounding that I could eat several at a time, with no apparent ill effect.
This being so, why was that a favourite thing? Did you follow up by pointing out the Bible verse where it's said that the faithful shall be able to drink poison without ill effect? I can see where that would be pretty convincing to someone being exposed to American candy for the first time.
Har Har...
TBH I don't think I referenced that scripture the entire two years I was a missionary. I wouldn't put it past the Chinese however to have some dish that must be cooked with snake venom.
 
Posted by Tuukka (Member # 12124) on :
 
I agree with Rabbit's post.

I haven't really noticed Asian people being more cosmopolitan in their tastes. Instead they seem to have a heavy emphasis on local cuisine - This from personal experience.

Personally I would argue that westerners are much more likely to eat Asian food at restaurants, than Asians are to eat western food at restaurants. The reason for this I think is very simple: The Asian restaurants in the west are almost without exception founded by Asian immigrant families, and a lot of western countries have notable Asian immigrant populations.

But on the other hand very few westerners immigrate to Asian countries, and those who do, don't typically want to work in the restaurant business. When you see a western-type "restaurant" in an Asian country, it's likely to be called "MacDonald's", or "Subway".

Someone mentioned Tokyo being a very cosmopolitan eating place... I don't agree, really. The very centre of Tokyo is reasonably cosmopolitan, Shinjuku, etc, but Tokyo and Japan in general are isolationist by nature, instead of cosmopolitan. One exception for this is Okinawa, where western food culture is visible for obvious reasons.

Probably the most cosmopolitan place you can find in Asia is Hong Kong, which does have an extremely varied and rich food culture.

I would say that immigration is a crucial element in making the local food culture more cosmopolitan. Immigrants bring their culture with them. Which is the reason why places like London or New York are extremely varied in their food culture. The less there are immigrants, the less there is variety in food.

Same goes for Asia. Because westerners don't often immigrate to Asia, the impact of western food culture is small. There is internal immigration in Asia, and Asian cities which have a lot of immigrants from other Asian countries, also have varied Asian cuisine. For example Malaysia has very large Indian and Chinese population, so the whole country is basically a meeting place of three different food cultures.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Tuukka:
... Personally I would argue that westerners are much more likely to eat Asian food at restaurants, than Asians are to eat western food at restaurants. The reason for this I think is very simple: The Asian restaurants in the west are almost without exception founded by Asian immigrant families, and a lot of western countries have notable Asian immigrant populations.

But on the other hand very few westerners immigrate to Asian countries, and those who do, don't typically want to work in the restaurant business. When you see a western-type "restaurant" in an Asian country, it's likely to be called "MacDonald's", or "Subway".

I think you've got this exactly backwards. Asian restaurants in the West are very often founded by Chinese immigrant families, true. But watch the Jennifer 8 Lee video from TED linked earlier. You'll find that what they cook has very little similarity to what is eaten in China. What Americans call "Chinese food", note the glaring error with the fortune cookie above by Adenum, is more often than not really just "American" food. Very few Americans actually eat real Chinese food.

This is actually crucial to explain the whole success of "Chinese" food in the West. Each Western country has an adapted "Chinese" food that is really just an adaptation of local cuisine. Jennifer Lee uses the line that "[this] Chinese food is more American than apple pie." Don't get me wrong, I'm not knocking it per say. The success of this is a great testament to the adaptiveness and inventiveness of Chinese immigrants, but they rarely actually eat this stuff.

On the other hand, although I've explained a few examples of Western food adapting in China, on the whole they don't (and the few that do, the cha chaan teng's for example are fading out). You can go to even an obscure Chinese city in the Chinese rust belt and it will still have an authentic MacDonalds and KFC serving almost exactly the same food they do in the US. The Daily Show notes this to great effect on their Olympics special.

So on one hand, even the most remote peasant in China will know about American cuisine and will have tried an authentic piece of it, even if just once. On the other hand, as was noted above you can have places like Fort Worth(?) as above where you probably can't get authentic Chinese food even if you tried.

There is simply a large informational disparity here.

[ July 26, 2009, 01:16 PM: Message edited by: Mucus ]
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Man, this this thread is really weird. The first post is references a ludicrous joke about Obama, and the actual discussion that has emerged is the most heated, vitriol argument about whether or not Americans eat a variety of foods I have ever seen.

My person experiences as an American are in line with what Mucus is arguing, but even it wasn't, I'd like to think I wouldn't be reacting with the indignation I'm seeing here. If we can't discuss eating habits without getting huffy, is it any wonder people are complaining about the quality of the forum going downhill?
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
Yup, I've had them and they just aren't very good. Yeah, I know that's an objective opinion but I think you will observe its a pretty wide spread objective opinion.

Only in the West. Asian desserts are doing quite well as noted by Azile.
And you'll note that dovetails neatly with my assertion about Asians being more cosmopolitan. Asians will very often eventually eat both, Americans even one as traveled as yourself often won't.

quote:
I've also been informed by several chinese friends that serving any dessert with a Chinese meal is non-traditional and reflects Western influence. A traditional chinese meal is conclude with soup, not a sweet dish. Sweets were something eaten as "snacks" and very rarely as part of a meal.
This is true and yet not a problem.

Snacks are big business in China. In fact, one could say thats the major innovation of Dim Sum, a form of restaurant that allows you to eat snacks in a random order, including desserts.

Also, that soup which has been brought up many times is actually a category of dessert, as the last one here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_desserts

quote:
quote:
Heck, we have a very popular holiday that is effectively devoted to cake.
I've had steamed rice cakes. I'm still waiting for a single example of a really good Chinese dessert
I was referring to moon cakes actually as in googling "moon cake festival"

quote:
In my experience, with the one exception of desserts, western restaurants are not nearly as common in Asia and Asian restaurants are in the west.
Tuuka noted the differential in immigration. If there are few Western immigrants to, say, China there will naturally only be few Western restaurants for Westerners only. On the other hand, the large immigration flow of Chinese immigrants to North America creates supply and demand for two tracks of restaurants. Western-Chinese restaurants for the local population and Chinese restaurants for the immigrants themselves. This effectively explains the very large difference in restaurant density between the two areas. Not only is does the difference in immigrant populations contribute, but the differing demand.

So I disagree with the explanation for the balance of Western/Asian restaurants, I think immigration explains more than taste. That said, I don't observe a large imbalance between the success of dessert and non-dessert Western restaurants in China. In fact, I would say the top most successful Western food providers are KFC, MacDonald's, Pizza Hut, and Starbucks. There are Haagen-Daz and Dairy Queens for sure, but I don't see them actually doing as well as the first bunch.
 
Posted by Tuukka (Member # 12124) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
I think you've got this exactly backwards. Asian restaurants in the West are very often founded by Chinese immigrant families, true. But watch the Jennifer 8 Lee video from TED linked earlier. You'll find that what they cook has very little similarity to what is eaten in China. What Americans call "Chinese food", note the glaring error with the fortune cookie above by Adenum, is more often than not really just "American" food. Very few Americans actually eat real Chinese food.

This is actually crucial to explain the whole success of "Chinese" food in the West. Each Western country has an adapted "Chinese" food that is really just an adaptation of local cuisine. Jennifer Lee uses the line that "[this] Chinese food is more American than apple pie." Don't get me wrong, I'm not knocking it per say. The success of this is a great testament to the adaptiveness and inventiveness of Chinese immigrants, but they rarely actually eat this stuff.

On the other hand, although I've explained a few examples of Western food adapting in China, on the whole they don't (and the few that do, the cha chaan teng's for example are fading out). You can go to even an obscure Chinese city in the Chinese rust belt and it will still have an authentic MacDonalds and KFC serving almost exactly the same food they do in the US. The Daily Show notes this to great effect on their Olympics special.

So on one hand, even the most remote peasant in China will know about American cuisine and will have tried an authentic piece of it, even if just once. On the other hand, as was noted above you can have places like Fort Worth(sic.) as above where you probably can't get authentic Chinese food even if you tried.

There is simply a large informational disparity here.

Yes, Asian people who have restaurants in the West tend to slightly adapt their food for the western taste. But it's still Asian food.

I've ate local food with local people in several Asian countries. And these restaurants were filled with local people, with no tourists in sight. Frankly, they have the same cuisines that Asian restaurants have in the west. Obviously there is some stuff that simply doesn't sell that well in the West, like intestines, but this simply means that the Asian restaurants in the West usually don't have everything that people in Asia eat. They couldn't, in fact, because there are just way too many different cuisines.

Whatever differences you are talking about, they are generally very small, and Asian cuisines culture is extremely varied anyway. You can have countless of different versions of the same cuisine, depending on the country, region and the restaurant.

I've heard sometimes people in the west say when they eat in for example Chinese restaurant, that the food doesn't taste authentically Chinese. What they mean is that it doesn't taste like in the restaurant they have eaten in China. But China is a massive country with very different regional cuisine cultures. And not only that, each cook has his own way of making food. So there is no one right way to make a certain cuisine, and there is no one right way for a cuisine to taste - Even if it might share the same name in every place.

It's hard to believe that you would think MacDonalds is a better representative of the Western cuisine culture, than an Asian restaurant which can have hundreds of different authentic Asian cuisines is as a representative of Asian cuisine culture.

I could also add that immigrant restaurants are often primarily serving other immigrants.
 
Posted by Tuukka (Member # 12124) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
Tuuka noted the differential in immigration. If there are few Western immigrants to, say, China there will naturally only be few Western restaurants for Westerners only. On the other hand, the large immigration flow of Chinese immigrants to North America creates supply and demand for two tracks of restaurants. Western-Chinese restaurants for the local population and Chinese restaurants for the immigrants themselves. This effectively explains the very large difference in restaurant density between the two areas. Not only is does the difference in immigrant populations contribute, but the differing demand.

So I disagree with the explanation for the balance of Western/Asian restaurants, I think immigration explains more than taste. That said, I don't observe a large imbalance between the success of dessert and non-dessert Western restaurants in China. In fact, I would say the top most successful Western food providers are KFC, MacDonald's, Pizza Hut, and Starbucks. There are Haagen-Daz and Dairy Queens for sure, but I don't see them actually doing as well as the first bunch.

I don't understand what you are saying here.

I don't know where to find statistics, but I think it's pretty much common sense, that immigrants bring their local food culture with them. That's simply how it goes. The more there are immigrants in a city, the more there are restaurants that serve their cuisine.

You can see this very easily, if you compare places with low and high immigrant populations.

The more local culture and the immigrant culture interact, the more both learn from each other's cuisine culture. The more they also eat each other's foods.

Are you denying any of this?
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
Unless I've missed something, which is possible, mucus linked to two articles. One of which quoted data indicating that Asians in Canada spend 23% more on groceries than the average Canadian and the other of which reported that Asians eat out more than Americans and Europeans. Neither article supports mucus' broad contention that Asians are more cosmopolitan in their tastes.

The second also reports that Asians are among the most likely to eat food from a different country when they go out whereas Europeans are the least likely. Combined with a higher rate of going-out in the first place, the conclusion seems to be pretty obvious. There are a lot of Asians eating food from a different country and more of it.

quote:
There are numerous explanations for this other than those suggested by mucus. For example, I'm not sure about Canada, but in the US Asians have higher average household incomes than other groups which might easily explain why they spend more on average on food.
No, IIRC, the same study noted that both South Asians and East Asians were more likely than the rest of the population to go to discount supermarkets. Given that US Asians typically have lower obesity levels than the general population, they're probably not simply buying more food at lower prices. The obvious conclusion is that many Asians are either buying a greater variety of food (and exotic foods cost more) or that they're dual-tracking their own kitchens, preparing both their own style of food and North American food.

quote:
According to my students from Malaysia, Indonesia, India and Thailand, its common in southeast asian cities for people to eat out because they have no kitchen in their homes (apartments). The fact that they eat many or most of their meals out reflects differences in living conditions that have little to do with having more cosmopolitan tastes.
Its a contributing factor yes, but the difference in dining-out rates persists even with Chinese Canadians. There is definitely a cultural element here which persists across architectural differences. For example, Chinese Canadians have a tradition of going out for dim sum on weekend mornings. WASPs have a tradition of going out for church on Sundays. Its a lot easier for the former to mutate to eating different foods than for the latter to mutate into dining out.

quote:
Originally posted by Raymond Arnold:
... If we can't discuss eating habits without getting huffy, is it any wonder people are complaining about the quality of the forum going downhill?

Hmmmm, I'll keep that in mind.
 
Posted by Tuukka (Member # 12124) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
]The second also reports that Asians are among the most likely to eat food from a different country when they go out whereas Europeans are the least likely.

I read the article, but I didn't see them saying that. Can you give a quote?
 
Posted by Tuukka (Member # 12124) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
]No, IIRC, the same study noted that both South Asians and East Asians were more likely than the rest of the population to go to discount supermarkets. Given that US Asians typically have lower obesity levels than the general population, they're probably not simply buying more food at lower prices. The obvious conclusion is that many Asians are either buying a greater variety of food (and exotic foods cost more) or that they're dual-tracking their own kitchens, preparing both their own style of food and North American food.

There are many conclusions we could have, except the one you want to make.

For example: How many members does a Chinese-Canadian household has on average when compared to a Canadian household? If they have households with more members, then obviously they spend more money on food.

Another example: Chinese households might simply buy more exotic, and therefore more expensive foods. This doesn't mean the variety of food is greater, it simply means it's more exotic.

You can't just pick and choose whatever conclusion you want, when there are other equally logical ones, unless you have hard data to back it up.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
quote:
Another example: Chinese households might simply buy more exotic, and therefore more expensive foods. This doesn't mean the variety of food is greater, it simply means it's more exotic.
Mucus' original post stated that they Chinese households tend to shop at asian markets which are cheaper per item.
 
Posted by Tuukka (Member # 12124) on :
 
I googled how "authentic" MacDonald's is in China, and found out it's about as authentic as the Asian restaurants are in the West. So I think your argument isn't working.

http://www.thechinaexpat.com/mcdonalds-advertising-in-china/

"We are also hard at work in the flavor laboratories we have in mainland China and Hong Kong, coming up with menu items that meld with the lifestyle of Chinese people, and that suit the taste buds of Chinese consumers.”

And reality shows that the “Quarter Pounder” in China is not exactly the same as the American one. Cucumbers replace pickles, and tomatoes and spicy sauce were added, ingredients that appeal to Chinese taste. This is the result of doing taste tests with 16 different combinations of various ingredients complimenting the Quarter Pounder.

While McDonald’s has thought about introducing the rice sandwiches/hamburgers it has brought out into Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Singapore into the Chinese market, consumer taste tests have revealed that the reason consumers in China go to McDonald’s is to eat McDonald’s specialties, not simply to eat local-like food."

 
Posted by Tuukka (Member # 12124) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Raymond Arnold:
quote:
Another example: Chinese households might simply buy more exotic, and therefore more expensive foods. This doesn't mean the variety of food is greater, it simply means it's more exotic.
Mucus' original post stated that they Chinese households tend to shop at asian markets which are cheaper per item.
I have no opinion on the matter, I was simply answering to what he said:

"Asians are either buying a greater variety of food (and exotic foods cost more)"
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Raymond Arnold:
quote:
Another example: Chinese households might simply buy more exotic, and therefore more expensive foods. This doesn't mean the variety of food is greater, it simply means it's more exotic.
Mucus' original post stated that they Chinese households tend to shop at asian markets which are cheaper per item.
I thought I said discount supermarkets, but I wrote a lot so anyways:

quote:
South Asian and Chinese Canadians account for about one-third, or $5.7-billion, of grocery spending in Toronto and Vancouver, according to market researcher Solutions Research Group. They tend to shop at discount supermarkets. They spend up to 23 per cent more on groceries than others in Canada. Now Loblaw has taken a bigger bite of the market by acquiring T&T. "Good move for Loblaw - it will pay off in the long run," said Kaan Yigit, president of Solutions.

***

TOP SUPERMARKETS

CHINESE - TORONTO

1. No Frills

2. T& T Supermarket

3. Loblaw

4. WalMart

5. Asian Food Centre

http://www.globeinvestor.com/servlet/story/GAM.20090725.RLOBLAW25ART1936/GIStory/

No Frills is a discount Western supermarket. I'm fairly certain that Chinese Canadian consumers are simply buying local foods from No Frills and using T&T as a supplement to import their own foods. Hence, more variety.

quote:
Originally posted by Tuukka:
... consumer taste tests have revealed that the reason consumers in China go to McDonald’s is to eat McDonald’s specialties, not simply to eat local-like food."

Eh? Thanks, like I said tastes [Smile]

Look, I've already said that MacDonald's and the like have started adapting, I even gave examples of foods. But that is nowhere in the neighborhood of chicken balls, chop suey, and fortune cookies.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I may have misquoted.
 
Posted by Tuukka (Member # 12124) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
Eh? Thanks, like I said tastes [Smile]

Look, I've already said that MacDonald's and the like have started adapting, I even gave examples of foods. But that is nowhere in the neighborhood of chicken balls, chop suey, and fortune cookies.

I have no idea what you mean with "Eh? Thanks, like I said tastes". Can you be more specific?

Anyway, you used MacDonald's and other fast food joints as examples of Asians eating Western food, yet claimed that Asian restaurants in the West can't work as examples of Westerners eating Asian food.

Do you now admit that your argument was incorrect?
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
I don't know a single mormon who interprets the Word of Wisdom so strictly that they won't eat food flavored with vanilla extract or use extracts and flavorings that contain alcohol. That doesn't mean there aren't any, but they are certainly extremely unusual.

Rabbit, you obviously would have far more experience with the subject than I would! But I'm fairly certain that there have been Mormon Hatrack members (maybe no current ones?) who mentioned avoiding extracts for this reason. And I found several discussion forums where no-longer-Mormons have complained about their Mormon relatives who won't eat their baked goods for this reason. (I'd link, but that's the sort of place we've been asked not to link to.)

So I have no idea how common it is, but I thought I was safer saying it varied.
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
quote:
But I'm fairly certain that there have been Mormon Hatrack members (maybe no current ones?) who mentioned avoiding extracts for this reason.
I recall them as well.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Tuukka:
I have no idea what you mean with "Eh? Thanks, like I said tastes". Can you be more specific?

It is a critical point in my argument that Asian people are going to Western restaurants like MacDonald's to get Western food. The fact that MacDonald's own marketing survey backs this up is just fortuitous. On the other hand, Jennifer 8 Lee's video (and myself) have strongly noted that the reverse is not nearly as true. Americans prefer to go to American-Chinese restaurants to eat foods that bear no similarity to their Chinese counterparts. The video demonstrates this by taking fortune cookies and General Tso's chicken back to China and asking locals what they are. They are understandably baffled.

quote:
Anyway, you used MacDonald's and other fast food joints as examples of Asians eating Western food, yet claimed that Asian restaurants in the West can't work as examples of Westerners eating Asian food.

Do you now admit that your argument was incorrect?

That is neither my argument nor one that I have accepted from someone else. In short, strawman.

Of course Asian restaurants in the West work as examples. There's just not a lot of them outside of the areas of high Asian immigration and there aren't that many Westerners eating at them.
 
Posted by Tuukka (Member # 12124) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
It is a critical point in my argument that Asian people are going to Western restaurants like MacDonald's to get Western food. The fact that MacDonald's own marketing survey backs this up is just fortuitous. On the other hand, Jennifer 8 Lee's video (and myself) have strongly noted that the reverse is not nearly as true. Americans prefer to go to American-Chinese restaurants to eat foods that bear no similarity to their Chinese counterparts. The video demonstrates this by taking fortune cookies and General Tso's chicken back to China and asking locals what they are. They are understandably baffled.

Give me a break here. Nearly all the Asian food in Asian restaurants in the Western world is Asian.

Unless you can provide exact statistics of this not being the case, you have no standing here. Fortune cookies or General Tso's chicken are not enough, sorry. They don't make the great majority of the food Westerners eat in Oriental restaurants. No, the Jennifer 8 video isn't enough, as it only seemed to provide random examples, not actual, proven statistics.

And yes, the link I posted says that Chinese go to MacDonald's to "western" food. Just like Westerners go to Oriental restaurant because they want to eat Oriental food. Why would you otherwise go to an Oriental restaurant? People pick a certain kind of restaurant because they want to eat certain kind of food. You don't go to an Italian restaurant, because you really want to eat Chinese food.

The link posted also shows that the MacDonald's food in China and other Asian countries is decidedly different than in the West. Earlier on you claimed it's almost the same, and more authentic than the Asian food in the west. Clearly this is not the case. This has been proven now, by MacDonald's itself.

To claim that "Americans prefer to go to American-Chinese restaurants to eat foods that bear no similarity to their Chinese counterparts." sounds very silly, and unless you can provide statistics to back up your claim, you have no standing in here, either. Statistics?

I can say with absolute certainty that while people I know go to Asian restaurants a LOT, they don't go there so that they can eat fortune cookies. Something like Chicken With Red/Green Curry And Rice is a much more obvious and popular choice. I'm betting it's a popular choice in North-America as well.

And I might note that "Americans" make only a portion of the Western world, and their behavior in American-Chinese restaurants in no way is representative of the behavior of the average member of Western culture in an average Oriental restaurant (which might or might not be Chinese).

I assume you have experience of other western countries besides USA and Canada, correct? Because if you don't, I fail to see how you could claim anything about the Western culture in general, unless you can provide statistics.

quote:
That is neither my argument nor one that I have accepted from someone else. In short, strawman.
Really? Here is a quote from you:

quote:

"I think you've got this exactly backwards. Asian restaurants in the West are very often founded by Chinese immigrant families, true. But watch the Jennifer 8 Lee video from TED linked earlier. You'll find that what they cook has very little similarity to what is eaten in China. What Americans call "Chinese food", note the glaring error with the fortune cookie above by Adenum, is more often than not really just "American" food. Very few Americans actually eat real Chinese food.

This is actually crucial to explain the whole success of "Chinese" food in the West. Each Western country has an adapted "Chinese" food that is really just an adaptation of local cuisine. Jennifer Lee uses the line that "[this] Chinese food is more American than apple pie." Don't get me wrong, I'm not knocking it per say. The success of this is a great testament to the adaptiveness and inventiveness of Chinese immigrants, but they rarely actually eat this stuff.

On the other hand, although I've explained a few examples of Western food adapting in China, on the whole they don't (and the few that do, the cha chaan teng's for example are fading out). You can go to even an obscure Chinese city in the Chinese rust belt and it will still have an authentic MacDonalds and KFC serving almost exactly the same food they do in the US. The Daily Show notes this to great effect on their Olympics special.

So on one hand, even the most remote peasant in China will know about American cuisine and will have tried an authentic piece of it, even if just once. On the other hand, as was noted above you can have places like Fort Worth(?) as above where you probably can't get authentic Chinese food even if you tried.

There is simply a large informational disparity here.

If in here you were not trying to give an example that Western food in Asian countries is authentic, but Asian food in Western countries is not, then I have no idea what you were trying to say. I literally can't figure it out.

quote:

Of course Asian restaurants in the West work as examples. There's just not a lot of them outside of the areas of high Asian immigration and there aren't that many Westerners eating at them.

Well my home city has only a very small Asian population, but a lot of Asian restaurants, and the customers are roughly 95% Finnish. When I've been to London, I would say that roughly 70-80% of customers in Asian restaurants are caucasian - This despite massive Asian immigrant population.

In Finland nowadays pretty much every town has Asian restaurants. Yet the Asian immigrant population is extremely small. But cuisine business is, if not the #1 choice for Asian immigrants here, it's certainly among their most preferred fields of work.

So that's my own personal experience. You have stated yours. Now what I really want to see is statistics. Don't you really see any Oriental restaurants in USA or Canada outside areas of high Asian immigration? Are there really only very few caucasians in these restaurants. I expect that other members of the forum, who live in North-American, can answer this.

Who knows, maybe the whole love for Asian food is restricted to only certain Western countries. But the argument has been about Westerners, not about Americans, or Canadians for that matter.

But let's go back to Asia:

You are claiming that Asians are more cosmopolitan in their cuisine culture, because they visit Western fast food joints - At least once in their life.

But there is a different angle to interpret the situation: American fast food joints do well in Asia because they are aggressively marketed, and have enormous resources to establish their presence.

In my knowledge so far there haven't been any Asian fast food joints that would have tried a similar muscular approach in the western world.

So in essence:

The popularity of Western fast food brands like MacDonald's in Asia, as opposed to popularity of Asian fast food brands in Western world, doesn't prove that Asians are more varied and cosmopolitan in their food preferences. It only proves that brands like MacDonald's have more resources, more effective marketing, and more agressive expansion strategies than their Asian counterparts.

That's the most simple, and most obvious answer to the phenomenon.

If we will see Asian brands trying to conquer Western market with the same aggression that MacDonald's is conquering Asia, and these Asian brands fail in their expansion... Then we might be able to say that Asians are more "cosmopolitan" in their food taste.

But before these kind of large-scale attempts to conquer western food market happen, we have no comparison to make. And if you can't make a comparison, then, well, it's pointless to make one.

And on a final note, I find it somewhat absurd that your criteria for how "cosmopolitan" someone's culinary taste is, is based on their willingness to eat fast food like hamburgers.

[ July 26, 2009, 04:51 PM: Message edited by: Tuukka ]
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
quote:
The popularity of Western fast food brands like MacDonald's in Asia, as opposed to popularity of Asian fast food brands in Western world, doesn't prove that Asians are are more varied and cosmopolitan in their food preferences. It only proves that brands like MacDonald's have more resources, more effective marketing, and more agressive expansion strategies than their Asian counterparts.

That's the most simple, and most obvious answer to the phenomenon.

Well, it's not if you're a cultural supremacist like Mucus is. Because for people like that, it's enough to provide statistics and anecdotes that simply could be used as evidence of the premise, and then assume that they really are evidence of the premise. Once you've done that, you just meekly say "but I showed you that stats!" I think he should be able to understand why those stats don't say what he wants them to be saying. That said, thank you for having more patience in explaining this- I've never had the patience necessary to deal with people like him.
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
In all fairness, Orincoro, you are also a cultural supremacist. In fact, I'd say you've been considerably worse about it than Mucus has. So why not chill a bit?
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by TomDavidson:
In all fairness, Orincoro, you are also a cultural supremacist. In fact, I'd say you've been considerably worse about it than Mucus has. So why not chill a bit?

I'm really not. I'm a classicist, yes, but lately I think of that as a private preference more than a steadfast belief. My opinions used to be quite different, but you don't see me posting about them much anymore, because I'm much more of the mind now that I'm a product of my background, and not a recipient of universal truth. You, on the other hand, have gone out of your way recently to cast aspersion on me at every opportunity, and I don't really thinks it's fair in this case- it's certainly not apros pos to this discussion. So why not lay off a bit?
 
Posted by Jon Boy (Member # 4284) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by rivka:
Rabbit, you obviously would have far more experience with the subject than I would! But I'm fairly certain that there have been Mormon Hatrack members (maybe no current ones?) who mentioned avoiding extracts for this reason. And I found several discussion forums where no-longer-Mormons have complained about their Mormon relatives who won't eat their baked goods for this reason. (I'd link, but that's the sort of place we've been asked not to link to.)

So I have no idea how common it is, but I thought I was safer saying it varied.

I personally don't know anybody who avoids extracts because of the alcohol, but the idea doesn't surprise me. I've known Mormons who don't eat white bread and refined sugar, which seems a lot stranger to me.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
I too have never met Mormons who don't cook with extracts containing alcohol. But like Jon Boy, I do know that in the past quite a few believed the Word of Wisdom also involved refined sugar and white breads. It wouldn't surprise me if those sorts of people exist today, or if there are Mormons who think Vanilla extract is unfit for any sort of food related use.
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
What these Mormons don't realize is that all John Smith was saying about "No Hot Drinks," was that he was tired of being served lukewarm sodas out of the pantry. I mean, these people did migrate to Utah. It's hot there. A prohibition was better than a commandment like: "thou shalt chill thy beverages to a pleasant degree."
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Orincoro:
What these Mormons don't realize is that all John Smith was saying about "No Hot Drinks," was that he was tired of being served lukewarm sodas out of the pantry. I mean, these people did migrate to Utah. It's hot there. A prohibition was better than a commandment like: "thou shalt chill thy beverages to a pleasant degree."

It's Joseph Smith, and Joseph Smith died before the move to Utah.
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
But other than that, he's spot on? [Wink]
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by rivka:
But other than that, he's spot on? [Wink]

Well with the latter point it kinda throws the support structure out from everything else.
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by BlackBlade:
quote:
Originally posted by rivka:
But other than that, he's spot on? [Wink]

Well with the latter point it kinda throws the support structure out from everything else.
I'll take solace in the fact that this sentence makes no sense.
 
Posted by scholarette (Member # 11540) on :
 
I always thought the word of wisdom came up because Emma Smith was mad about the men spitting tobacco all over her house. That and drunk Mormons is the streets. [Smile] Though I have heard that the heavy focus on the word of wisdom was because we got rid of polygamy (kinda a crazy argument, but I guess with only one wife, it is easier to not drink). While the w of w had been around for awhile, supposedly no one cared about it until after polygamy was banned (I don't know enough history to refute or confirm that claim).

As far as vanilla, while I don't personally know anyone, I am almost positive I have read posts on the internet about people refusing vanilla. I don't have a link though- but I remember thinking wow, folks sure are crazy.

ETA- BB- Missouri is awfully hot as well. A chilled drink down there would be nice.
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by BlackBlade:
quote:
Originally posted by Orincoro:
What these Mormons don't realize is that all John Smith was saying about "No Hot Drinks," was that he was tired of being served lukewarm sodas out of the pantry. I mean, these people did migrate to Utah. It's hot there. A prohibition was better than a commandment like: "thou shalt chill thy beverages to a pleasant degree."

It's Joseph Smith, and Joseph Smith died before the move to Utah.
PSH. I think I know *a little* more about your religion than you do. Next you're going to tell me that the first Dali Lama didn't invent the art of the ninja, and that Jesus didn't speak English. You're preposterous, sir. Preposterous.
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by scholarette:

ETA- BB- Missouri is awfully hot as well. A chilled drink down there would be nice.

I accept your apology.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
The second also reports that Asians are among the most likely to eat food from a different country when they go out whereas Europeans are the least likely. Combined with a higher rate of going-out in the first place, the conclusion seems to be pretty obvious. There are a lot of Asians eating food from a different country and more of it.
No it doesn't. The study found the following

quote:
Chinese and Italian food—perennial international favourites—are close runners up to local cuisine, with 26% and 17% of the global respondents choosing them as their second favourite choice. Ironically, while 34% of Chinese respondents prefer their local cuisine as their first choice for dining out, 56% say that Chinese cuisine is their second most favourite. And Australians and Singaporeans prefer Chinese food even over their local fare. In Hong Kong, consumers’ first preference is for Japanese cuisine (42%), and in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the preferred cuisine is Indian (34%). The preferences in Singapore and UAE are likely driven by ethnicity, as Singapore’s population is 75% Chinese and UAE is nearly 50% South Asian. The most patriotic restaurant-goers are the Italians, with 91% saying they prefer their local cuisine, followed by consumers in Turkey (82%) and India (81%).
From this report, we can conclude that Chinese are more likely to prefer non-local cuisine when they dine out than Italians but less likely than Australians. There is no data that suggest the Asians as a whole are more likely than westerners as a whole to have more cosmopolitan tastes. You are drawing far more sweeping conclusions from these reports than are justified which was my point from the beginning.
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
And mine, but The Rabbit has stated it quite effectively.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
As an aside on this study, I find it curious that the study found that dinner (the evening meal) is the most common time for people to eat out. In my experience, the midday meal is the meal people are least likely to eat at home. And while it is common for Americans to pack a lunch, its also extremely common for them to buy lunch at a fast food place or company/school cafeteria.

Studies have reported that every day 25% of Americans eat fast food. That just isn't consistent with survey results that say the average American eats out less than once a week. I think the problem is that most Americans don't consider grabbing a burger at McDonald's, having lunch at the Cafeteria or ordering a Pizza to be 'eating out'. I suspect that when most Americans think of 'eating out', they think of going to a restaurant, sitting and being served, and that is something they are most likely to do for an evening meal. I suspect that the average American, if asked in a survey how often they ate out, would not think to include everytime they got fast food, cafeteria food or take out. I don't know how this would skew the results of this study, but it very well may.

The way you ask a question can dramatically skew results and this is a very tricky issue when doing a trans_cultural survey.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
I'm also familiar with studies done by some of Americas major processed food producers where they placed Cameras in peoples homes (with their permission of course) and observed what and how they actually ate. What they've found is that Americans lie about their eating habits. They are far less likely to have a home cooked family meal than they report. Far more likely to eat fast food, take out, or preprepared microwave meals and less likely to actually sit down as a family than they report. It's hard to say to what extent Americans have deceived themselves into thinking they have good eating habits and to what extent they consciously lie about it, but either way surveying Americans about their eating habits gives highly inaccurate results.

[ July 27, 2009, 05:31 AM: Message edited by: The Rabbit ]
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
It's hard to say to what extent Americans have deceived themselves into thinking they have good eating habits and to what extent they consciously lie about it, but either way surveying Americans about their eating habits gives highly inaccurate results.

(total aside, but hey)

Oh god, sitting down with my family every night for dinner represented the most excruciatingly awful moments of my youth. It wouldn't have been as bad if it were just one or two of us, but four adolescents being forced to sit down together at least 4 times a week, especially when they don't really like each other all that much to begin with, is hell. It's weird, but I think that's one of the main reasons I hate eating with other people as an adult- my parents were absolutely convinced that they were doing the right thing by "all sitting down together," but it became such a negative experience, really beyond their ability to correct or manage, that I really think it did more harm than good. Certainly it did nothing to bring us closer as a family. Maybe that's an uncommonly bad result, or maybe I'm misjudging the actual effect, but I wish my parents had been able to adapt as their children got older. It can't be good to be forced to eat in a state of unadulterated rage- and when you're 15 it's either rage or misery most of the time.
 
Posted by malanthrop (Member # 11992) on :
 
"Good" eating habits may be a relative concept. Someone might think they are eating well by eating at home but this ignores they type of food they eat at home. Chicken fried steak with lots of gravy and mashed potatoes loaded with butter? Sure, on the plate it seems better than a burger and fries, but in reality maybe worse. Fast food carries a stigma thanks to the media. When I'm in a hurry and grab McD's, I feel always feel a twinge of guilt thanks to the indoctrination but I know my wife's lasagna with butter soaked French bread and Caesar salad probably adds up to more fat and calories. The focus isn't on eating well at home, it's about putting down the fast food industry and big corporate food manufacturers. Good reason to establish a fat tax. It's easier to tax Kraft and McDonalds than your grandmother's kitchen.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
'Good' eating habits are definitely a relative concept but the fact that people commonly lie about their eating habits is not.

While I suppose Americans may have many motives for lying about their eating habits, it certainly suggests that many Americans feel somewhat guilty about the way the actually eat.
 
Posted by malanthrop (Member # 11992) on :
 
I only feel guilty when I go to McDonald's, but in reality what my wife cooks may be just as bad. The guilty feeling comes from what we read, see and hear from the educational institutions, govt and media. In reality a burger and fries made at home are probably worse than McDonald's but I don't feel guilty in the least for having greasy home fries and a backyard grilled burger that is three times the thickness of a drive through joint. Why?
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
Orincoro, My experience with family meals is quite different. When I was growing up my mother served a family meal 7 days a week and it was exceptional if anyone was missing, in fact we frequently had friends as well as family. I have only positive memories of family meals, even during the years when we had 4 or more adolescents around the table. I can't say the same is true of all the family activities my parents forced us to participate in, but family meals in our house were good thing.
 
Posted by malanthrop (Member # 11992) on :
 
When I grew up we had a garden and canning sessions every season. My brothers and I would go catch fish or slaughter a chicken for mom. My father and uncles would load our chest freezer with elk and deer meat. In reality, we ate about as healthy as anyone could, but I felt somewhat embarrassed by it. Rich kids ate beef and store bought veggies. The commercials told me I should eat fruit loops while I ate eggs collected from the chicken coup the day before. Perception and reality are impacted by what society tells us. Mothers use to churn butter and ice cream at home. Now the bad corporations make butter and ice cream for us. We can pass the blame of our bad health on to the corporations that produce our food. My backyard burger is much worse than McDonald's and my wife's sweet tea is just as bad as any soft drink but the government can tax the fast food or soda industry and the justification will be perceived valid.

[ July 27, 2009, 07:46 AM: Message edited by: malanthrop ]
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
You know mal, I grow less and less inclined to believe anything you say about yourself.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
... It's hard to say to what extent Americans have deceived themselves into thinking they have good eating habits and to what extent they consciously lie about it, but either way surveying Americans about their eating habits gives highly inaccurate results.

I think thats an interesting idea. Certainly, I have issues with the numbers. Clearly, their definition of "Chinese food" as reported by the consumer differs from my definition of "Chinese food" as reported by the chef.

I'm just not sure how your idea would affect the statistics on dining out. I mean, why would Americans be more inclined to lie than citizens in other places of the world*?

* (as opposed to a much more uniform level of lying, pushing down all dining-out statistics)

quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
From this report, we can conclude that Chinese are more likely to prefer non-local cuisine when they dine out than Italians but less likely than Australians. There is no data that suggest the Asians as a whole are more likely than westerners as a whole to have more cosmopolitan tastes.

I think you're glossing over a few things. First, Italian food and Chinese food are clearly the best in terms of popularity if you examine the global averages chart. The others don't really come close, especially on second preference.

Now, despite this Chinese consumers display a very out-sized taste in international food while the converse is displayed in Italy. Also note Hong Kong which is polled separately and is highlighted as preferring Japanese food as a first preference.

Now, I agree that the lack of data for other countries is disappointing and is more conclusive for diners in Hong Kong and China.

However, a lack of data which doesn't really bolster either of our cases and I still think there is something highly suggestive about a 57% point difference in preferences for local cuisine between China and Italy. There is clearly a different reaction to having one of the world's "best" foods.
 
Posted by malanthrop (Member # 11992) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
You know mal, I grow less and less inclined to believe anything you say about yourself.

I don't blame you...I've had a very interesting life. I lived in Eastern Washington as a child. The Cascade range separated what the Seattle people called...509ers. 509 being the area code on the redneck part of the state. If you lived there now, you definitely wouldn't believe me, its changed that much. Now it's like Northern California. The Wenatchee valley of WA state. Back then it was free. Now, you can't fish but a couple months a year and only with barbless hooks and no live bait. We use to hike into the mountains to lakes that are now protected and inaccessible. Apple growers who can't compete with Chinese apples are subject to "Growth Management" laws and cannot develop their land. It can remain a picturesque orchard for the now wealthy residents or be turned over to the state for national park protection.

I don't blame you for doubting me. Where I use to live, killing chickens and fishing is a place of summer homes for wealthy Californian immagrants who now outnumber the natives. The laws that have been passed and property taxes that have gone up have driven out most the original families.
 
Posted by malanthrop (Member # 11992) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
You know mal, I grow less and less inclined to believe anything you say about yourself.

I don't blame you...I've had a very interesting life. I lived in Eastern Washington as a child. The Cascade range separated what the Seattle people called...509ers. 509 being the area code on the redneck part of the state. If you lived there now, you definitely wouldn't believe me, its changed that much. Now it's like Northern California. The Wenatchee valley of WA state, back then it was free. Now, you can't fish but a couple months a year and only with barbless hooks and no live bait. We use to hike into the mountains to lakes that are now protected and inaccessible. Apple growers who can't compete with Chinese apples are subject to "Growth Management" laws and cannot develop their land. It can remain a picturesque orchard for the now wealthy residents or be turned over to the state for national park protection.

I don't blame you for doubting me. Where I use to live while killing chickens and fishing, is now a place of summer homes for wealthy Californian immagrants who now outnumber the natives. The laws that have been passed and property taxes that have gone up have driven out most the original families. Funny thing is...now that the rich, elite environmentalists have flooded in, it is like any other place of sprawl. Strange that the people looking out for the environment need more than one house in more than one state. They must really care about the environment for passing their laws to prevent urban sprawl and the destruction of the scenery.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Tuukka:
Give me a break here. Nearly all the Asian food in Asian restaurants in the Western world is Asian.
...
I can say with absolute certainty that while people I know go to Asian restaurants a LOT, they don't go there so that they can eat fortune cookies. Something like Chicken With Red/Green Curry And Rice is a much more obvious and popular choice. I'm betting it's a popular choice in North-America as well.

Ummm, no. This is emphatically not the case.
In fact, one could say thats the entire point of the book. Indeed, I would bet that any number of much more famous dishes like the two above and sesame chicken, chop suey, chicken balls, egg rolls, etc. would be a much more obvious choice. I daresay any of them have embedded themselves to such an extent in the North American culture that I would be highly surprised if people were secretly eating "Chicken With Red/Green Curry And Rice" while being misinformed about the former.

quote:
And yes, the link I posted says that Chinese go to MacDonald's to "western" food. Just like Westerners go to Oriental restaurant because they want to eat Oriental food. Why would you otherwise go to an Oriental restaurant? People pick a certain kind of restaurant because they want to eat certain kind of food. You don't go to an Italian restaurant, because you really want to eat Chinese food.
Ummmm, no.
The MacDonald's market research clearly illustrates the alternative. They call it "local-like" foods and they are in fact surprised that this is not what the Chinese market wants. If you read the full article, it actually says MacDonald's tried to go local too fast and there was a big drop in sales.
I'd argue that the majority of Asian food in Asian restaurants in the Western world is merely "local-like" food.

quote:
The link posted also shows that the MacDonald's food in China and other Asian countries is decidedly different than in the West. Earlier on you claimed it's almost the same, and more authentic than the Asian food in the west. Clearly this is not the case. This has been proven now, by MacDonald's itself.
I don't think so. MacDonald's clearly being pushed by demand into offering more authentic American food than Asian food does in the West.

quote:
And I might note that "Americans" make only a portion of the Western world, and their behavior in American-Chinese restaurants in no way is representative of the behavior of the average member of Western culture in an average Oriental restaurant (which might or might not be Chinese).

I assume you have experience of other western countries besides USA and Canada, correct? Because if you don't, I fail to see how you could claim anything about the Western culture in general, unless you can provide statistics.

Sigh.
Thats actually another chapter of the book. She does a survey of Chinese foods across the world, including Europe. That would be chapter 14 according to the website and there are taped interviews with people in Europe who without exception always name some odd adaptation of local food as "Chinese food."

These experiences match every book on the Chinese immigration experience that I've read. Namely, the odd quality of "Chinese food" that they encounter.

She did not provide statistics, but I don't see why I'm being hounded for them by you despite that fact that you've provided exactly none.

quote:
If in here you were not trying to give an example that Western food in Asian countries is authentic, but Asian food in Western countries is not, then I have no idea what you were trying to say. I literally can't figure it out.
This may indeed be the crux of the problem. I'm just not sure where to start. Which step can't you figure out?
 
Posted by malanthrop (Member # 11992) on :
 
Fortune cookies in China are called American Cookies. We haven't been exposed to real Chinese food in America, at least not much. Comparing real Chinese food to an American Chinese joint is like comparing real Mexican food to Taco Bell. Pizza is not Italian either, not in the form we would recognize. It's Chinese, Mexican and Italian style American food.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
I'm just not sure how your idea would affect the statistics on dining out. I mean, why would Americans be more inclined to lie than citizens in other places of the world*?

* (as opposed to a much more uniform level of lying, pushing down all dining-out statistics)

It isn't simply lying, its a question of how people perceive the questions as well as cultural differences in what is considered a desirable eating habit. I don't know how this would influence the average Asian. Americans and Europeans clearly don't count grabbing something from a fast food establishment or eating in the cafeteria as 'eating out'. At least if they do there are some serious inconsistencies between this study and other studies. But maybe Chinese do think that buying noodles at a corner stand or buns from a street vendor is 'eating out'. A simple cultural difference like this could wildly skew the stats. Furthermore, maybe in a rapidly developing country like china, eating out more frequently is prestigious and a sign of affluence, which would make people more likely to exaggerate how frequently they eat out. Where as Americans and Europeans might be more prone to thinking of a home cooked meal as superior to an inexpensive restaurant and therefore be more prone to exaggerate how often they cook at home. I don't know if any of these supposition are accurate, but it is not difficult to postulate numerous ways in which cultural differences could skew such a survey.
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
quote:
Maybe that's an uncommonly bad result, or maybe I'm misjudging the actual effect, but I wish my parents had been able to adapt as their children got older.
Well, I certainly wasn't having my family meals while contorted into a shiny ball of rage. Maybe it's because I knew how to sit next to my family without hating them.
 
Posted by malanthrop (Member # 11992) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
[QUOTE] Furthermore, maybe in a rapidly developing country like china, eating out more frequently is prestigious and a sign of affluence, which would make people more likely to exaggerate how frequently they eat out.

I think you are on to something here Rabbit. Signs of affluence are the determining factor. Now eating out is associated with obesity which is considered unattractive. In the past, leanness was associated with the peasant and chunkiness with the wealthy. Venus on the Half Shell was chunky to say the least. For most of human history, the thicker the woman the more attractive since only the rich and powerful could afford extra weight. Our supermodels would be viewed as peasants four hundred years ago. Unlike today, the majority were poor and skinny while ruled over by well fed nobles.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
I'd also like to add that I object to calling McDonalds and KFC authentic American cuisine, though I don't know what else you would call them. They certainly aren't like anything my mother or my friends mothers, or me or my friends ever cook in our homes. Its not even particularly similar to food that you would find in any sit down restaurant in America.

I have absolutely no clear idea what the average American means when they say they prefer local cuisine. American cuisine is very diverse and changing rapidly. It reflects the immigrant nature of our country and pop culture. Local cuisine in New Orleans is very different from local cuisine in New York or Santa Fe.

As for the authenticity of Chinese and other Asian restaurants in the US, its all over the map. I've been to Chinese restaurants that serve only dishes like general tsao's chicken and Egg Foo Young, but I've also been to restaurants where you can get bitter melon, chicken's feet and pork liver, definitely not dishes that cater to the Western taste. My sense is that over the past 20 to 30 years, there has been a general shift away from Amer/Asian dishes and toward more authentic Asian cooking but I have no data to back that up beyond my own experience.

Beyond that, I'm not sure why the question is relevant. Ethnic restaurants in the US and Europe may not be authentic, but they certainly are diverse. Italian food in Seattle may not be exactly like Italian food in Florence, but it certainly is very different from the Chinese, French, Thai, Indian, Turkish, Mexican or Moroccan restaurants you are likely to find in the same neighborhood. Authenticity is not the same as diversity and diversity is a much better indication of cosmopolitan tastes.

Furthermore, the western desserts and pastries you find popping up all over Japan and Hong Kong are for the most part fairly poor mimics of their European counterparts as well. You do occasionally run across an exception, but for the most part they aren't really representative of the best European desserts anymore than the average Chinese restaurant in the west is representative of the best Chinese cooking.

Its also worth noting that the best Asian desserts I've had come from parts of South East Asia like Vietnam and Thailand that had centuries of European colonial influence. China and Japan, where European influence was much more limited, really have inferior desserts even by Asian standards.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Tuukka:
... But there is a different angle to interpret the situation: American fast food joints do well in Asia because they are aggressively marketed, and have enormous resources to establish their presence.

This is an interesting idea and I think it is worth exploring.

Now, obviously I'm not taste is mostly based upon some unchangeable attribute, say genetics (although I would note that lactose intolerance helps explain the lack of dairy foods among Southern Chinese) but that it is mostly based on culture. Obviously culture is changeable, China would have been one of the least cosmopolitan say, a little over 50 years ago.

Certainly, you would not wish to sell beef in India or alcohol/tea in Utah or pork in a Jewish enclave.

So taste is cultural and changeable. And if it is in fact the case that the success of MacDonald's is due to their success in using advertising to change Chinese tastes*, and that Chinese restaurants in the US have failed to change American tastes then I see no problem with this as an explanation for how we have got to this point.

* (Although I would argue that there are more historical and cultural reasons that explain the growth of American companies in China as opposed to marketing)

But this seems to me to be a separate discussion on how to affect and change cultural taste rather than what the current cultural taste is.
 
Posted by malanthrop (Member # 11992) on :
 
If we are going to focus on current cultural tastes, we should avoid American tastes. Tastes in America have become noticeably spicier in proportion to the increase in Mexican-American population. Jalapeno potato chips, hot this or salsa that. American tastes continually shift for the population at hand, a melting pot of flavors for better or worse. Personally, I loved the duck in Singapore, steak in Australia and fish tacos in Southern Mexico. I can't imagine eating a tarantula, but if in a Brazilian rain forest with natives, I might just like them.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
I'd also like to add that I object to calling McDonalds and KFC authentic American cuisine, though I don't know what else you would call them. They certainly aren't like anything my mother or my friends mothers, or me or my friends ever cook in our homes. Its not even particularly similar to food that you would find in any sit down restaurant in America.

I'm going to have to think about this. I'm not really sure why you're splitting it up this way. To me, food is food.

MacDonald's and KFC are authentic American cuisine because they're basically the most popular cuisine for Americans to eat. They literally call the documentary, "Fast Food Nation."

Also, a Big Mac seems to basically be a standardized ... well, hamburger that one would get from a home BBQ.

I dunno, I'll have to think about this. But for now I'll leave you with a Russel Peters video that touches on the subject of how to become a Canadian (in terms of food).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOm-15621bs
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
Chinese restaurants in the US have failed to change American tastes then I see no problem with this as an explanation for how we have got to this point.
I think its ridiculous to claim that Chinese restaurant haven't changed American tastes. American Chinese food doesn't taste like other forms of American food. It may not be authentic Chinese, but it certainly tastes more like authentic Chinese food (which btw I have eaten) and American home cooking (or McDonalds) And while Chinese restaurants may not have been able to convince the average American to try pork liver or chicken's feet, it's silly to argue that they haven't changed American taste. I suspect that rootbeer hasn't caught on in China either.

First, its worth noting that you are greatly exaggerating the success of McDonald's in China. According to China Daily, there were 960 McDonald's in China in 2008. That's less than one McDonald's for every million Chinese persons. At that ratio, its extremely unlikely that every Chinese person has tasted a McDonald's burger.

Second, I have little idea what the draw is of McDonald's in China. I do know that in Europe, McDonalds tends to attract expats looking for familiar food and service in English and people in their teens and early twenties who think its cool to eat at an American establishment. They've also been very successful at attracting the convenience eater by having very quick turn around and the commuter segment of the population by locating restaurants with easy access to highways. It has everything to do with image and convenience and almost nothing to do with taste. I have yet to meet a European who prefers the taste of McDonald's food to local cuisine.
 
Posted by malanthrop (Member # 11992) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
I'd also like to add that I object to calling McDonalds and KFC authentic American cuisine, though I don't know what else you would call them. They certainly aren't like anything my mother or my friends mothers, or me or my friends ever cook in our homes. Its not even particularly similar to food that you would find in any sit down restaurant in America.

I think that these things are associated with America by the rest of the world since they came from America but agree that they are not "American Cuisine" It takes time for the American label of the product to dissipate. IE, Levi jeans....American pants or Zippo lighters. Take it back further....cars, radios, light bulbs, airplanes, microwave ovens, television, etc. Many new things have been initially created in America and lose their authentic American television label as they spread throughout the world. McDonalds will lose it's American label in China just as every American understands the Chinese food in the food court is not really Chinese. The fact is America is the greatest not because Americans are better than the French and Chinese but because it's a place where the French and Chinese came together to combine ideas. No people are superior but when it comes to food, the best food will come from the people with the deepest spice rack.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
MacDonald's and KFC are authentic American cuisine because they're basically the most popular cuisine for Americans to eat. They literally call the documentary, "Fast Food Nation."

Also, a Big Mac seems to basically be a standardized ... well, hamburger that one would get from a home BBQ.

I disagree on all counts. A Big Mac is less similar to a home cooked BBQ hamburger than the typical American Chinese restaurant food is to authentic Chinese cooking.

The fact that a documentary dubbed the US 'Fast Food Nation' does not prove McDonald's and KFC are the most popular type of food around. There are a lot of complex reasons for the success of fast food in America, it simply isn't fair to conclude that its what American's like best. I sincerely doubt that when the average American talks about local foods, they think McDonalds.

Fast food simply isn't the most popular cuisine in America no matter how you count it. Fast food isn't even a cuisine, its a style of eating. McDonald's and Taco Bell aren't the same cuisine. Even if 1 in 4 Americans eats fast food ever day, that still makes 11 out 12 meals something other than fast food.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by PSI Teleport: Zomg. I've been meaning to make some sticky rice and mango. You, good sir/ma'am, have just encouraged me to do so.
Yeah, I've been kind of craving it lately too. Not sure when I'll get a chance to make it again, though.

quote:
To everyone else in this thread, BOO to all of you. BOO because you have access to cool supermarkets and Asian food and French markets and...stuff. Fort Worth, Texas is the least cosmopolitan city in the universe, and I don't need evidence to back that up. In fact, I refuse to go look for it.
I was kind of surprised by this. Even podunk little towns in Kansas are likely to have an Asian grocery store. Not good ones, necessarily, but still. Anyway, I did a little googling, and it looks like there are actually a number of Asian grocery stores in Ft. Worth

quote:
Originally posted by Orincoro:
My opinions used to be quite different, but you don't see me posting about them much anymore, because I'm much more of the mind now that I'm a product of my background, and not a recipient of universal truth.

[Smile] Very cool, Ori. It doesn't surprise me in the least that you're experiencing this mental shift.
 
Posted by Rakeesh (Member # 2001) on :
 
quote:
A Big Mac is less similar to a home cooked BBQ hamburger than the typical American Chinese restaurant food is to authentic Chinese cooking.

While a Big Mac - not being cooked on a grille - is (slightly) dissimilar to a home cooked BBQ hamburger, if you go to for example Burger King there's really only a technical difference in preparation. In any event, I think you're seriously overstating the difference between home-cooked hamburgers (lots of folks fry hamburgers at home) and fast-food variety. What is more likely to be different is ingredient quality, though.

quote:
Even if 1 in 4 Americans eats fast food ever day, that still makes 11 out 12 meals something other than fast food.
This is less compelling if it turns out those other three Americans are each eating entirely different sorts of meals. 1/12 meals being fast food is still possible for fast food to be the most popular, if the remainder range from hard boiled eggs to eggplant parmesean.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
I disagree on all counts. A Big Mac is less similar to a home cooked BBQ hamburger than the typical American Chinese restaurant food is to authentic Chinese cooking.

I disagree. A Big Mac is recognizable as a hamburger and that is in fact how its recorded in the statistics. Like so:

quote:
Although most Americans eat their evening meal at home, only one in three actually makes it from scratch, as takeout and convenience foods are becoming increasingly common on the dinner table.

A new study of trends in U.S. food consumption shows made-from-scratch dinners have dropped 7 percent over the last two years and now account for only 32 percent of evening dinners.

quote:
The study, published in Food Technology, shows that hamburgers, french fries, and pizza were the top three most popular items ordered in restaurants overall by adult men and women. Men’s favorite order was hamburgers and women favored french fries.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,181849,00.html

On the other hand, the Google Chats version of Jennifer 8 Lee's talk shows her bringing back various elements of American Chinese cuisine such as General Tso's chicken and fortune cookies and they are totally unrecognizable.
 
Posted by malanthrop (Member # 11992) on :
 
Some Americans eat 5 out of 10 meals as Top Ramen Noodles. Is that American cuisine? There are two guys who work with me every night. One is married to a high ranking female Army Officer, he brings in leftover restaurant food every day (usually pizza). The other is a Filipino who is married to a Mexican. He brings in the best food, his wife makes both styles for him. Trying to judge what exactly is American cuisine is impossible. If you say it's steak and potatoes for the white people, you ignore the blacks and latinos. If you say it's chicken and okra you ignore the whites and latino's. If you say it's chorizo and menudo you igonore the whites and black. I've even ignored many categories in this statement and my picks may be stereotypically insensitive. It could be matza balls or borsh. Picking one thing in America is not like attributing potatoes to the Irish, American is too diverse. There is no American cuisine. Maybe in a way, the marketable, universal crap like McDonald's is the only food that is truly American; a product of our society for the rest of the world, rather than the rest of the world's contribution to our society. What type of cuisine does my Filipono coworker married to a Mexican eat? One American family that eats the food of two different cultures....you cannot identify American food as anything other than an ever changing hybrid. I look at American food like rap music, they take the best of others and mix into something different.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
(I just realized.
Technically, that report doesn't seem to define "restaurant."
I'm assuming that burgers and fries dominate because restaurants include fast-food. But I guess it is possible that they're recorded separately, with burgers and fries dominating American cuisine in restaurants even subtracting fast-food

For health's sake, I hope this is not true)

Edit to add: Still trying to find stats on what is the most popular home-cooked meal. Not having much luck.

[ July 27, 2009, 04:33 PM: Message edited by: Mucus ]
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by TomDavidson:
quote:
Maybe that's an uncommonly bad result, or maybe I'm misjudging the actual effect, but I wish my parents had been able to adapt as their children got older.
Well, I certainly wasn't having my family meals while contorted into a shiny ball of rage. Maybe it's because I knew how to sit next to my family without hating them.
Is there something about me that you have grown to dislike so much, that every interaction between us will now contain you reacting with scorn to the things I say? I'm asking this seriously, because I respect you and like to interact with you. I asked you to lay off the last time you did this, and you haven't listened. If this is going to be the pattern, I will absolutely leave here, and never come back. So please tell me what you think you want to do from here on.
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
Still trying to find stats on what is the most popular home-cooked meal. Not having much luck.

I'd just speculate that it isn't hamburgers, but probably pasta, specifically what Americans think of as Spaghetti, and what Europeans might call anything from Carbonara, to Spaghetti Marinara or Bolognese.
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
quote:
Is there something about me that you have grown to dislike so much, that every interaction between us will now contain you reacting with scorn to the things I say? I'm asking this seriously, because I respect you and like to interact with you.
No, I like you quite a bit. I just want you to stop trying so incredibly hard to be what you're trying to be. You're a very good, very intelligent person, and you don't need to put on airs.
 
Posted by TheQuestioner (Member # 11747) on :
 
Good gravey, now there's a t-shirt:

http://www.patriotdepot.com/TenCommandmentsTshirt.aspx
 
Posted by Darth_Mauve (Member # 4709) on :
 
You notice, they edit out "Thou Shall Not Bear False Witness" in favor of something totally different.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Darth_Mauve:
You notice, they edit out "Thou Shall Not Bear False Witness" in favor of something totally different.

[Wink]


I guess 'Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor (unless you suspect them of liberalism) wouldn't have really worked with the rest of the t-shirt.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I like how the commandments are all "sourced" to him saying things like "you know, there are people who live here other than Christians and maybe we should try to use faith constructively to build bridges instead of burn them" to mean "I'm God."
 
Posted by MrSquicky (Member # 1802) on :
 
It's sort of like the Happy Holidays thing. Trying not to exclude other people is somehow actually an attack on Christians.

Apparently, they also feel mortal dread at the idea of non-Christ related ice breakers.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MrSquicky:
It's sort of like the Happy Holidays thing. Trying not to exclude other people is somehow actually an attack on Christians.

Apparently, they also feel mortal dread at the idea of non-Christ related ice breakers.

While that's a valid criticism MrSquicky, I've still noticed that some who use Happy Holidays for that purpose also get a slight kick out of aggravating the Christians that care about that.
 
Posted by MrSquicky (Member # 1802) on :
 
I'll grant that, but, c'mon, everybody gets at least a slight kick out of aggravating those types of Christians.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MrSquicky:
I'll grant that, but, c'mon, everybody gets at least a slight kick out of aggravating those types of Christians.

From time to time I am amused by their behavior, but I'd never do it to their faces just to illicit a response.
 
Posted by Javert (Member # 3076) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by BlackBlade:
From time to time I am amused by their behavior, but I'd never do it to their faces just to illicit a response.

Nor do I. But I enjoy the response when I get it nonetheless.
 
Posted by PSI Teleport (Member # 5545) on :
 
quote:
I was kind of surprised by this. Even podunk little towns in Kansas are likely to have an Asian grocery store. Not good ones, necessarily, but still. Anyway, I did a little googling, and it looks like there are actually a number of Asian grocery stores in Ft. Worth.

I should have been more specific. I live in Aledo, a rural community about twenty to thirty minutes from Fort Worth. The closest decent Asian food market is in Haltom City, which is on the other side of Ft. Worth. It's a pretty far drive. In other words, none of those markets are close enough for me to run to when I'm out of peanut oil. This is very different from Tucson, where I had three quality Asian food stores within two miles of my house. *sigh*

However, i stand by my assertion that Ft. Worth is the least cosmopolitan city in all of creation. *pouts*

[ July 30, 2009, 02:56 PM: Message edited by: PSI Teleport ]
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
Ah, I didn't realize that you weren't actually in Ft. Worth.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
The closest decent Asian food market is in Haltom City, which is on the other side of Ft. Worth. It's a pretty far drive.
Whine whine whine. I call Bozeman MT home. It has no Asian food markets of any kind (or at least it didn't a couple years back). The closest half decent Asian food markets (according the my Asian students) are in Salt Lake (425 miles) and Seattle (700 miles). I used to stock up on Asian food items about ever 6 months when I was in either Salt Lake or Seattle. You can't get fresh vegetables or seafood that way, but peanut oil, spices and rice paper will easily make it that long.
 
Posted by PSI Teleport (Member # 5545) on :
 
Yes, but Bozeman doesn't claim to be metro. It's embarrassing, living so close to a metroplex with 5 million people in it, to have to drive so far for that kind of stuff.

Noemon: It isn't technically Fort Worth, but it's considered a bedroom community. Fort Worth is nothing but sprawling suburbia anyway, and we're on the edge of it.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
Yes, but Bozeman doesn't claim to be metro.
Nonsense, Bozeman is the cosmopolitan cultural hub of the Greater Yellowstone region.

[Razz]
 
Posted by Tatiana (Member # 6776) on :
 
My metro area only has a population of a million but we do have a few really good Asian markets, and lots of great Asian restaurants. I'm still wanting to try Vietnamese. There are none that I know of in town. But pretty much everything else is here.

The quality of restaurants in a town (as I found from my travels) is almost directly proportional to its population. In NYC or Toronto, nearly every corner restaurant features delicious tasty fresh food prepared well, and wonderful service. In my modest little city we have some pretty good restaurants. In small towns the food tends to be fairly bad. They serve wilted brown lettuce and act like we can't tell the difference? But occasionally you find some gem of a restaurant in a small town that surprises you.

In Waynesboro, Georgia for instance, a tiny town, there's a place called Taylor's Barbecue. If you like southern cooking, it's absolutely wonderful. Man I wish I had some now. Very high carb and high fat but wow they make some fantastic corn fritters. Another one is (was) Warehouse #1 in Monroe, Louisiana. Their hush puppies were so good we couldn't stop eating them. The fried catfish was wonderful there too.

So I guess that goes to show that eating local cuisine might be the best bet in small towns, while in big cities you can try pretty much anything and be in luck.
 
Posted by Rakeesh (Member # 2001) on :
 
quote:
Nor do I. But I enjoy the response when I get it nonetheless.
So, cop to it and don't pretend your motives are entirely honorable. Chapping the ass of someone you disagree with is not a good intention.

Note though that (especially from me) that's a pretty minor criticism.
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
From almost anyone here, really, that is a pretty minor criticism.
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
Oh my goodness, there is something major here that needs addressing that nobody else has touched on! I cannot let it slide.

quote:
I like processed cheese. Whenever I move to new area I buy the store brand american cheese from all the nearby grocery stores so I can tell which one is the best.
You clearly need Cheese Educating. Americans and Canadians do not have access to the beautiful tart, subtle cheeses that make up the world's available quality cheese and it leads to horrible tragedies like the above quote.

American "cheese" can be tasty but to source it like it's a fine Double Gloucester, Brie or Wendsleydale... it's a tragedy.

Once upon a time, cheddar became the North American basic cheese, and that's a shame because of all the cheeses in the world, cheddar is kind of not a tremendously good example.

*becomes a cheese importer*
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
quote:
Americans and Canadians do not have access to the beautiful tart, subtle cheeses that make up the world's available quality cheese...
Ahem.
Look, I understand that you grew up in Third World countries and all, but I live in Wisconsin and I will gladly put the cheddars produced within 50 miles of my house against the best Brie you can come up with.

Brie is congealed boredom. Even the best Brie in the world merely manages to be pleasant. By comparison, a good cheddar is divine.
 
Posted by Sharpie (Member # 482) on :
 
I keep meaning to learn to make cheese at home, but I forget to find out what exactly is required and then when I'm out and see one of the things I vaguely remember being required, I figure: what's the use of picking up only one or two parts of the cheesemaking operation? I'll clutter my house for NOTHING, because it will take ages before I remember to look up what all else is needed.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Brie is congealed boredom. Even the best Brie in the world merely manages to be pleasant. By comparison, a good cheddar is divine.
This man speaks the truth.
 
Posted by fugu13 (Member # 2859) on :
 
The brie one can get in the US is hardly the best example of international cheese making, in part because of what is allowed to get past our border controls. Many cheeses can't come to the US because they are illegal (usually illegally young).

edit: and if you read her post, the other two of the cheeses she mentions are hardly soft cheese such as Brie, so calling out Brie as the example of what she's advocating is rather silly. I would expect both Wensleydale and Double Gloucester to be quite pleasing to the palate of any Cheddar-lover, even if they ended up coming down on the side of Cheddar (and along those lines, I'd have to say I prefer basic Red Leicesters to most basic Cheddars; I haven't sampled enough at the high end of Red Leicester to compare to high end Cheddars).
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
I happen to really like Brie (and I have had the good stuff, in Paris), but I still think a really good Cheddar is superior.

That said, there are a whole LOT of awful, awful cheddars out there. The worst I can say about a mediocre brie is that it's bland; some lousy cheddars are a crime against humanity.
 
Posted by Bella Bee (Member # 7027) on :
 
Melted goat's cheese, on toasted French bread, with a topping of red onion caramelised in balsamic vinegar = Heaven.
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
Yes, yes, I deliberately didn't mention the Wensleydale because I happen to like Wensleydale, although not as much as I like a truly good cheddar. But to mention Wensleydale in a sentence meant to imply that it, like Brie, is a good cheese....*shudder*

But, yeah, the typical American "cheddar" is a crime against humanity. That's hardly fair, though; it's like impugning Swiss cheese because Kraft or Sargento make Swiss slices that somehow manage to taste like fermented wax.

(Note: I am a total cheese nerd. But I am a sharp cheese nerd. The first time I visited Paris, on the very first day I was in Paris, I rushed to one of Frommers' favorite fromageries just to see exactly how different European raw milk cheeses were from American ones. The answer: different, but not sufficiently better to make soft cheese worth the purchase.)
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
Just because Brie is a soft, mild cheese, doesn't mean it's boring. You clearly just don't like soft cheese.

My true, non-flippant, point is, cheddar isn't the only cheese in the world. There are zillions of cheeses quite similar to cheddar that aren't cheddar. There are about five that show up again and again: Brie/Camembert, Cheddar, Gouda, a blue cheese, the very occasional Edam etc. Where are all the others? Cheese is more expensive in Canada than it is in England, too.

I'm not against Cheddar; I eat it frequently. But I'm against the total monotonous domination of the cheese market by Cheddar. [url\http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheddar_cheese]According to Wikipedia[/url], this is due to the British Government and WWII.

Tom, since you come from cow country, you probably have access to cheaper and more diverse cheese, but the fact that you can* come up with several (hundred) different types of cheddar instead of all different diverse types of cheese is sad-ish (although clearly you can get Wendsleydale-- which I can't [Frown] )

I'm just bitter because I just got back from Cheese Country and I'm back to the same old five substandard cheeses.

*that is to say, you choose to come up with.
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
quote:
the fact that you can* come up with several (hundred) different types of cheddar instead of all different diverse types of cheese is sad-ish
Out of interest, why?
(And, for that matter, why assume that I -- or any other random American cheese lover -- couldn't also come up with non-cheddar cheeses?)
 
Posted by dkw (Member # 3264) on :
 
No kidding. I have access to hundreds of different types of cheeses. All the grocery stores around here (in the midwest of the USA!) have a good sized imported cheese section, and there are gourmet stores with larger selections. Plus mail-order, of course. And the farmers markets have a wide variety of locally made cheeses, from cow, goat, and buffalo milk.
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
It's probably just Canadia then.

Man, my frivolous comment is really much more dangerous than I thought it was going to be.
 
Posted by fugu13 (Member # 2859) on :
 
Yeah, we have tons of great cheese available here (Bloomington, Indiana). Our local grocery has at least fifty major varieties represented, many with several good brands (the semi-fat hard cheeses are particularly well represented, probably because even the best of those are legal in the US, since they aren't a young cheese, but they're still a little exotic -- grana padano, for instance).
 
Posted by Jamio (Member # 12053) on :
 
Supermarket cheese is the way it is because you can trust it to keep being the way it is, no matter what store you're in, or what color label it's got slapped on.

After spending my last few years at home on a farm where my mother made delicious goat's milk mozzerella regularly, I decided when I moved out that I wouldn'y go back to the supermarket brands ever again, but my first ventures at the imported cheese counter were a cheddar that cost three times as much as regular, but tasted not a jot different, and a smoked mozzerella that turned out to be a rubber ball rolled in creosote.

Until I can make my own, I'll be sticking with store brand.
 
Posted by Temposs (Member # 6032) on :
 
Most of those imported cheeses you see in a typical grocery store are also by giant farms in Europe or wherever, and you can find the same import brands all over the country. Like your store brands, the imports are often the way they are because you can trust them to be the same no matter where you go.

If you want good cheese that you don't have to make yourself, I suggest looking for local cheese makers at your local farmer's market and similar.

Or, if you want to find the best cheeses, you can look at the results of the large cheese contests, like the US Championship Cheese Contest:
http://www.uschampioncheese.org/_apps/contest_results/index.php?cal_info=34

If you put some effort into it, you can get plenty of good cheese!
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
I was recently in Toronto at a conference and was taken to lunch by a colleague who is originally from Hong Kong but is a long term Toronto resident. Over lunch, I asked him whether the food was authentic. He said it was extremely authentic as were most chinese restaurants in Toronto. He also agreed with my other Chinese friends assessment that you can very frequently get better Chinese food in North America than you find in China. He said this was both because better quality ingredients are available in North America and because one can find foods from all regions of China in north American cities where as in China one tends to find regional dishes only in their region.

So I'm sorry Mucus, but even other Chinese Canadians don't agree with your assessment.
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by fugu13:
The brie one can get in the US is hardly the best example of international cheese making, in part because of what is allowed to get past our border controls. Many cheeses can't come to the US because they are illegal (usually illegally young).

you can still get brie on par with anyone else's brie here in the united states. if somebody hates brie, it's simply because they have not acquired or can not (different people's mouths and senses of tastes can often be remarkably and mechanically different) acquire the taste for it, and they won't understand what makes brie awesome.

Similar phenomenon occurs with olives, beets, wine, and even sweet potatoes.
 
Posted by fugu13 (Member # 2859) on :
 
You can only get the very best, freshest brie illegally (not that it is very hard to do so).

However, I agree that even the brie we can import can be quite awesome. I like it baked, personally.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
you can still get brie on par with anyone else's brie here in the united states.
No you can't. At least not legally. The best brie is made from unpasteurized milk and is not legal to sell in the US.

That said, even though I find the real Brie available in Europe to be clearly superior to the stuff that is legal in the US, I doubt very much that someone who hates American Brie is going to love real French Brie. They aren't that different. It is however possible that someone who finds American Brie to be nothing special might find real French Brie to be quite awesome.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
He said it was extremely authentic as were most chinese restaurants in Toronto.

*shrug* I'm from Toronto. Toronto and Vancouver are hardly representative of North America with their very large Chinese populations, at least 10% in Toronto's case. That said, you don't have to go far to only Mississauga for the non-authentic restaurants to outnumber the authentic ones.

Remember, there is only a roughly 4% Chinese Canadian population in Canada as a whole and less than half that in the case of the US. (But very unevenly distributed)

quote:
He also agreed with my other Chinese friends assessment that you can very frequently get better Chinese food in North America than you find in China.
*shrug* Your hypothetical Chinese friends would greatly disagree with my friends (bosses, work colleagues). Just today I've heard a story about a fellow alumni who gained many pounds after going back to China due to the massive change in food quality and this is not an isolated case.

Also, it is not as though Chinese chefs are often homegrown! The restaurant industry is an exceedingly common destination for immigrants but rarely for Canadian-born. But it is not usually the well-off that immigrate to work in restaurants, but the lower class trying to make a better life for themselves. These comprise the vast majority of Chinese restaurant workers and rarely have formal training.

However, the high-end has related issues.

Example:
quote:
.. the principal obstacle to improving Chinese fare here is the difficulty of getting visas for skilled workers since 9/11. Michael Tong, head of the Shun Lee restaurant group in New York, has said that opening a major Chinese restaurant in America is next to impossible because it can take years to get a team of chefs from China. Chinese restaurateur Alan Yau planned to open his first New York City restaurant last year but was derailed because he was unable to get visas for his chefs.
...
When authentic Chinese cuisines reach our shores, we can expect a revolution in ingredients and styles that will change the way we prepare food for years to come. Look how quickly our taste for offal, sous-vide cooking and tasting menus have grown. We have a much more ambitious dining culture today than we did 150 years ago.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/15/opinion/15zagat.html?_r=1

Or
quote:
The visa restrictions have had an impact on quality, the owner of the Shun Lee Palace, Michael Tong, said, pointing to what he called the decline of good Chinese food in the city over the past 30 years.

"It's difficult for top Chinese chefs to get to America, and with a booming Chinese economy they don't need to leave," he said.

http://www.nysun.com/new-york/celebrity-chefs-face-visa-troubles/45678/

Things are slightly better in Canada, but the superior economics in China still win out.

quote:
... and because one can find foods from all regions of China in north American cities where as in China one tends to find regional dishes only in their region.
Sorry, but this is just wrong. Going back a dynasty or two, Beijing food has always been an amalgamation of various regional dishes due to officials and trade going to the imperial court. Hong Kong has it to a lesser extent as well due to rather more forced immigration. Market reforms since the 80s have contributed to this trend in other major cities.

But food variety is already a step removed from quality and a bit of a red herring.
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by fugu13:
You can only get the very best, freshest brie illegally (not that it is very hard to do so).

It tends to be remarkably easy here.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
Your hypothetical Chinese friends would greatly disagree with my friends (bosses, work colleagues).
What's hypothetical about the Chinese scientist I had lunch week in Toronto two weeks ago? Perhaps your command of the English language is weak and you meant to say that you doubt that I actually had lunch two weeks ago in Toronto with a Chinese colleague and that we actually had this conversation -- but that isn't what hypothetical means.

I'm an engineering professor. I've spent nearly thirty years of my life on US University campuses doing science and engineering. Given the very large number of Chinese people who come to the US to do graduate level work in science and engineering, it is hardly a far out proposition when I claim that I have had many Chinese colleagues, friends and students. In fact, given my particular background its almost unimaginable that I would not have known a large number of 1st generation Chinese immigrants.

If you are accusing me of lying, I guess that's your prerogative but come out and say it rather than couching it in incorrect English.

quote:
Sorry, but this is just wrong. Going back a dynasty or two, Beijing food has always been an amalgamation of various regional dishes due to officials and trade going to the imperial court. Hong Kong has it to a lesser extent as well due to rather more forced immigration. Market reforms since the 80s have contributed to this trend in other major cities.
I hope you will understand why I'm not going to take the word of some one on the internet who claims to be a 2nd generation Chinese immigrant living in Canada over what I have been told many times by the numerous 1st generation Chinese friends and colleagues I know in real life.

I know that there are a lot of non-authentic Chinese restaurants in north America. But there are also a lot of very authentic Chinese restaurants around. And I've been around enough to know the difference. Toronto and Vancouver aren't the only places in north America with large Asian populations. San Francisco, New York, Seattle, Portland, San Jose, and even Chicago have significant numbers of Asian residents. The state of California is nearly 15% Asian. Pretty much any where in the US where there is a concentration of high tech industry, there will be a significant chinese immigrant population. In all those places you can find restaurants that serve quite authentic Chinese cuisine. What's more, Chinese cuisine isn't very different from any other cuisine in this respect. America is full of Italian restaurants that have little in common with real Italian cuisine. The same is true for French, German, Japanese, Mexican, Spanish, Greek, Ethiopian, etc. But one can also find authentic cuisine from all or most of those regions.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
Perhaps your command of the English language is weak and you meant to say that you doubt that I actually had lunch two weeks ago in Toronto with a Chinese colleague and that we actually had this conversation -- but that isn't what hypothetical means.

Sure, attack the language. Classy [Razz]

But seriously, hypothetical is the best word I can think of to describe what I think is happening here. I don't doubt that you had lunch with a Chinese colleague and I don't doubt that you "think" you got agreement with your points.

But I also know that you're dead wrong and the description of a Hong Kong native that would claim that the food in Toronto outranks that in Hong Kong itself is so foreign to my experiences, the best explanation is that your perception of events has totally separated from the reality of what happened.

In any culture, one can use leading questions to get the answers that one wants, but this is especially true in Chinese culture. I am told that this actually happens quite often.

For example,
quote:
Sometimes foreigners feel like their Chinese friends lie to them. They say they agree even when they don’t, and reply, “OK” even when they mean, “Not really.” Even if the foreigner later realizes that their Chinese friends didn’t intend to disrespect them, the foreigner might then feel like Chinese politeness requires lying. Chinese cultural expectations sometimes seem to demand a daily dose of “white lies” and multiple possible meanings to the word “yes.”
http://chinahopelive.net/2008/10/19/chinese-people-like-it-when-you-lie-to-them

I guess when here and constantly interacting with foreigners that want to tell me something about my culture, one can go the Raj route and be often frustrated that Sheldon wants to tell me something about my culture (a trap that I seem to be falling in) or one can just agree politely and move on. Sometimes hurting feelings and breaking illusions is just not worth it.

quote:
I hope you will understand why I'm not going to take the word of some one on the internet who claims to be a 2nd generation Chinese immigrant living in Canada over what I have been told many times by the numerous 1st generation Chinese friends and colleagues I know in real life.
*Shrug*
And I hope that you understand that I'm not going to take the word of someone on the Internet that claims to have had a couple conversations with Chinese friends over an entire life living with Chinese parents and relatives, or over what I have been told many times by both 1st and 2nd generation Chinese friends and colleagues that I know in real life (or my own experiences abroad for that matter).
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
Toronto and Vancouver aren't the only places in north America with large Asian populations. San Francisco, New York, Seattle, Portland, San Jose, and even Chicago have significant numbers of Asian residents. The state of California is nearly 15% Asian.

Contrary to popular perception, Asians are not interchangeable [Wink]

Technically, British Columbia is 9.66% Chinese whereas California is only 3% Chinese. Ontario as a whole is more comparable at 4.8% Chinese but as I've noted before we're very concentrated in Toronto (Markham and Richmond Hill to be exact).

But I think a city level is more relevant and going through the list, little else really compares.

Toronto is at 537,000 and Vancouver is at 402,000. New York is at 361,000 (but less than half percentage-wise compared to Toronto*) and San Francisco is already a big drop at 152,000 (albeit with a percentage similar to Vancouver which is heartening).

Everything else is pretty small fry.

Anyways for arguments sake, let's say I grant you these two cities which are already both a step down. This is still hardly representative of the American experience!

(God, I wish it was though. No 8 years of Bush, no Iraq War ...)

I would also note that the differences between the Canadian policy of multiculturalism versus the US melting pot and the much more intense Canadian immigration policy also play a role.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
But seriously, hypothetical is the best word I can think of to describe what I think is happening here. I don't doubt that you had lunch with a Chinese colleague and I don't doubt that you "think" you got agreement with your points.
I'm sorry I insulted your language but hypothetical simply doesn't work here. I don't even know what you mean by it if you aren't accusing saying you doubt the conversation ever occurred, even after your further exposition of the idea. Hypothetical implies that the situation described is suppositional, a thought experiment presented solely to allow further exploration of a hypothesis. Saying something is "hypothetical" means it is purely made up or imagined. Hypothetical is the opposite of "factual", "concrete" and "real".

This isn't a situation I made up or even contrived to me able to make a point on this forum. It was a very real and congenial lunch conversation which I thought I'd relate here because it was so relevant to the conversation we'd been having. I wasn't making any points over lunch, I asked the guys opinion on whether the restaurant was authentic because I was interested. He answered the question and volunteered the piece about being able to find better quality and variety of Chinese food in Toronto than in Hong Kong.

Maybe he was just trying to impress us with his choice of restaurants or boasting about the greatness of Toronto but it didn't seem like that at all. Plus, what he said was consistent with what I've heard from other Chinese immigrants under completely different circumstances.

quote:
But I also know that you're dead wrong
Excuse me, but I don't think you were at the table. Unless you happen to be the bus boy who was speaking cantonese with my colleague, I can't see how you have any authority by which to make the claim that I am dead wrong about what was said by my colleague over lunch.

quote:
and the description of a Hong Kong native that would claim that the food in Toronto out ranks that in Hong Kong itself is so foreign to my experiences, the best explanation is that your perception of events has totally separated from the reality of what happened.
Get off your high horse. Being the son of Chinese immigrants doesn't make you an expert on the opinions of everyone from China or even Hong Kong. You aren't the only one here who knows many first generations immigrants from China. Your experiences are simply quite different from mine. I don't doubt that your Chinese friends and acquaintances get nostalgic about the food back home, that's pretty typical immigrant behavior. But its really insulting for you to say you can't believe anyone from Hong Kong or China might behave differently from your friends and that I must be deluded in some fashion if I report anyone from China behaving differently from your circle of aquaintances. If you had been there when I ran into a former student from Beijing at a scientific meeting, how would you have interpreted it when I asked him how he liked living and working Manhattan and he went on and on about how the Chinese food in Manhattan was better quality and more varied than he could get in Beijing. I never even asked about food, or restaurants or the chinese community -- Just "How do you like living in Manhattan". How would you have interpreted it if you had been in my office when a Chinese friend from Hongzhou dropped in to tell me I needed to try a new chinese restaurant she'd discovered where the cooking was even better than her mother's. (BTW this same friend often waxes poetic about her mother's cooking and even invited me to dinner when her mother visited the US so I could see what she was talking about.) And I wasn't asking her for restaurant recommendations or seeking her opinion on the local food, she knows I'm a bit of a food and came to share her enthusiasm.

And yes, the "if you had been there part" is hypothetical, but the rest of those situations are not. They really happened and my report of them is very accurate. If you can't even imagine that these events happened as I described them, then your imagination is sorely lacking.
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
This may be the funniest thing I've ever seen you get angry about, Rabbit. I mean, seriously, take a step back for a second and look at this conversation. It's hilarious as all heck. [Smile]
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
I keep wanting to step in, but then I keep realizing I should just watch.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
Please enjoy yourselves. I'm not actually angry at all. This argument is purely for sport. Any one interested in fighting about cheese?
 
Posted by kmbboots (Member # 8576) on :
 
Oh, The Rabbit, you poor deluded thing. Watching you pretend to know Chinese people just so you can feel better about yourself is just so sad!
[Cry]

Please, please, try to resign yourself to being so much less cosmopolitan than Mucus.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
Please enjoy yourselves. I'm not actually angry at all. This argument is purely for sport. Any one interested in fighting about cheese?

All I'll say is, I've had Chinese food in many places in the US, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Mainland China, and Taiwan, but never Canada. Taiwan wins so far hands down.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Samprimary:
quote:
Originally posted by fugu13:
You can only get the very best, freshest brie illegally (not that it is very hard to do so).

It tends to be remarkably easy here.
I have smuggled raw Camambert and Brie into the US on more than one occasion but only for personal consumption. I never actually tried to buy contraband cheese in the US.

How do you go about buying cheese on the black market? I'm imagining people watching the cheese counter until there is no one in hearing distance. Walking up to the clerk, leaning in a bit and whispering. "Lennie tells me you guys have some of the (insert code word for illegal cheese)." The clerk, after first looking over his shoulders in all directions to make sure no ones listening, leans over the counter and whispers back, look meet me out back by the dumpster in an hour and we can make a deal".

Or maybe its 2 AM at a wine and cheese tasting party, only the hard core are still around when one guy says softly "Hey, I got a great deal on some (insert code word for illegal cheese). I've got 5 kilos in the my car, who wants in? Then a few people are assigned to stand nonchalantly by the door watching for cops, while someone jury rigs a scale to divide up the goods and then conceals the contraband in Kraft wrappers just in case anyone is stopped by the cops on the way home.

[ September 30, 2009, 12:45 PM: Message edited by: The Rabbit ]
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by BlackBlade:
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
Please enjoy yourselves. I'm not actually angry at all. This argument is purely for sport. Any one interested in fighting about cheese?

All I'll say is, I've had Chinese food in many places in the US, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Mainland China, and Taiwan, but never Canada. Taiwan wins so far hands down.
The best chinese meal I ever had was prepared for me by a Taiwanese friend in Vienna. It was about 12 courses, every one of which had an elaborate explanation.
 
Posted by fugu13 (Member # 2859) on :
 
In a lot of places you can just go into a cheese shop and ask for the stuff. That's a bit brusque, though. I think the accepted general approach is to start a conversation about fresh cheeses, then talk about how you've tried a lot of the easily available stuff, but you're looking for something more "special", and do they have anything they could recommend?
 
Posted by Eaquae Legit (Member # 3063) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Teshi:
It's probably just Canadia then.

Man, my frivolous comment is really much more dangerous than I thought it was going to be.

Teshi, you do know where the cheese markets are in Toronto, right? There's one called Global Cheese in Kensington, on Kensington Ave just south of Baldwin. They are AMAZING and have a LOT of different cheeses, and they won't let you buy anything until you've tasted it first (even if you've tasted another gouda, for example, they'll still make you taste theirs). They are awesome. There's also Cheese Magic, which is a few steps away on Baldwin, but I like them less. And if you go alllll the way up to Major Mackenzie and Yonge St in Richmond Hill, there's Grande Cheese Factory Outlet, which is a big warehouse full of cheese and pasta.

You CAN find Wensleydale - I have. Go check it out, especially Global Cheese, but bring cash because that's all they take. They've never let me down when I'm looking for a specific cheese.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
Clearly this market for dangerous illegal cheese has gotten out of hand. We can't let these ruthless cheese dealers keep pushing this stuff. These cheeses are dangerous!!! Think of the children!!!

Its time for a serious crack down. We need to declare a "War on raw cheese". We need a "fromage force" in every police department. I want to see plane clothes "cheese agents" going into gourmet delis and striking up conversations with customers about "those fine french raw cheeses". I want to plant an agent in every English department to buddy up to cheese snobs and sniff out the Brie eaters. We need cheese sniffing dogs at all our border crossings. I want to see SWAT teams busting up wine and cheese tasting parties looking for contraband cheeses.


This lawlessness has gone on long enough!!
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
You CAN find Wensleydale.
I've had Real Yorkshire Wensleydale in England and it's an OK cheese, but I didn't find it all that distinctive. A bit of a disappointment really considering all the hype I heard. Maybe a mature Wensleydale would be more to my liking.

I know that you can find a good variety of cheeses in the US but I've spent too much time in Europe to think there is even a comparison. In North America, good cheeses are over priced and you have to hunt to find them.

Where I work when I'm in Germany, there is a farmers market twice a week with around two dozen cheese vendors, each of whom has an assortment of cheese superior to your typical gourmet cheese shop in North America. Cycling across France I can't tell you how many times we've rolled into some town barely big enough to support a supermarket, and found the supermarket stocked with a mind boggling variety of regional specialty cheeses along side reasonably priced cheese from every corner of Europe.

If you search hard enough you can find very good cheeses in the states. The variety of cheeses available in your typical US supermarket has come along way since my child hood when cheddar, velveta and american processed cheese slices were all that was commonly available and even swiss, monterey jack and mozzarella were considered a bit like specialty items.

But lets not pretend that the US is even in the same league with Europe when it comes to cheese. We just aren't.
 
Posted by Eaquae Legit (Member # 3063) on :
 
Oh, I'm not arguing that it's easier in North America (Canuck here [Wink] ). I used to refer to the cheese wall at Marks & Spencer as The Magical Wall of Cheese. When people make jokes about British food, I always tell them about the magical things Europeans (Brits included) do to dairy products. (I never understood the fuss people made over butter till I had Normandy butter... *drool*)

But it's not impossible to find good cheese in Toronto, and since Teshi was lamenting not being able to find it, I figured I'd share where I knew it was available.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by BlackBlade:
All I'll say is, I've had Chinese food in many places in the US, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Mainland China, and Taiwan, but never Canada. Taiwan wins so far hands down.

This is actually related to my line of argument.

See, it would be a reasonable conversation if the proposition was that one of Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong had the best Chinese food. At least they have historical reasons to have the best Chinese food and the population to support it.

But the proposition that the US, a place which in total has less Chinese people in total than even a second-rate Chinese city has the best Chinese food (or variety) is just absurd. Even the restaurant owners and reviewers from NYC that I linked to earlier accept that American Chinese food is second-rate.

I'm only exploring the Canadian data to note that as much as the state of Canadian Chinese food sucks, it still clearly out-classes its American counter-part.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
Saying something is "hypothetical" means it is purely made up or imagined. Hypothetical is the opposite of "factual", "concrete" and "real".

I tire of this. I'm not attached to the word. Come up with a word that is in the middle and describes a situation properly and I'll consider it in good faith. I tire of your playing with words when the meaning is clear.

How do detectives describe the phenomenon when witnesses to a crime relates the details in an inconsistent way with their minds filling in the gaps? That thing.

quote:
... I can't see how you have any authority by which to make the claim that I am dead wrong about what was said by my colleague over lunch.
Does one have to personally witness global warming to know that it is happening?

quote:
Get off your high horse.
You first. If you didn't notice, I was just mirroring your statement directly.

quote:
I don't doubt that your Chinese friends and acquaintances get nostalgic about the food back home, that's pretty typical immigrant behavior.
That is inconsistent with the the experiences of second-generation relatives that have grown up elsewhere and reported on their experiences overseas or my own for that matter. Nostalgia is insufficient as an explanation.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
tire of this. I'm not attached to the word. Come up with a word that is in the middle and describes a situation properly and I'll consider it in good faith. I tire of your playing with words when the meaning is clear.
I can't come up with a word for what you mean because I haven't a clue what you might mean by calling my story a "hypothetical situation". My best guess was that you were accusing me of making it up, but you say that wasn't your intent. I don't have a second guess. Its not my responsibility to clearly communicate your ideas.
 
Posted by dkw (Member # 3264) on :
 
Anecdotal.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
But the proposition that the US, a place which in total has less Chinese people in total than even a second-rate Chinese city has the best Chinese food (or variety) is just absurd. Even the restaurant owners and reviewers from NYC that I linked to earlier accept that American Chinese food is second-rate.
That was never my proposition. Yes, on average Chinese food available outside China is not authentic and often second-rate. My proposition was much narrower, that it is possible to get very authentic very good Chinese food in North America and that in some specific places that food may be even better than what you get in China.

I believe that proposition because I have been told that, not once by someone who visited China, but several times in several different setting by several friends and associates who are immigrants from various parts of China.

I get that you doubt the veracity of that claim. But aside from the fact that you haven't heard those comments from your own Chinese friends and associates, why is it so unfathomable to you that my Chinese friends might have said these things to me? Look specifically at what I've reported.

quote:
1. The Chinese population in Manhattan includes people from every region of China.
Do you think that is an unreasonable assessment? If so, why?

quote:
2. The Chinese population in Manhattan is more diverse than the chinese population you would typically find in a Chinese city.
I think that follows pretty logically from #1 but if you don't, please elaborate. I suspect that in places like Hong Kong and Taiwan you also find lots of immigrants from other regions and so those places are also more diverse than a typical Chinese city. But even in those places I would expect that local people are a dominant majority. Is that an unreasonable assumption? Do you have any data that would suggest that any Chinese city is as diverse as Chinese immigrant populations in North America?

quote:
3. A more diverse population will typically lead to more diversity in the the types of foods and the kinds of restaurants available
This one also seem to follow rather logically to me and matches well with my experiences as a traveler. Do you have any exceptions to that claim?

Based on claims 1 - 3, I think it logically follows that:

quote:
Chinese restaurants in Manhattan offer a wider variety of Chinese cuisines and regional specialties than one can find in most Chinese cities
Can you point to any flaws in my logic here?

Now consider the next claim implied by my friend in Toronto.

quote:
A first rate chinese chief in Toronto has access to higher quality ingredients than what is generally available in China. So a first rate chief Chinese chief in Toronto will make be able to make better quality dishes than if he were in China
Now I can imagine several claims that might invalidate this.

1. There are no first rate Chinese chiefs in New York, not even one.

I'm willing to buy that there may not be enough good Chinese chiefs in the New York. I'm willing to buy that the average Chinese chief in New York is worse than the average chinese chief in Hong Kong. But no first rate Chinese chiefs in Manhattan. Not a single one? No, I find that unfathomable.

2. Ingredients commonly available in China are typically at least as high quality as those available in North America.

I guess its possible but it seems highly improbable. You are going to have to produce some pretty substantive data to support it if you try to make that claim.

3. Quality of the ingredients makes no difference in chinese dishes.

Once again, you are going to have to be awfully persuasive if you take that tack.

I've detailed exactly what my claims are, why I believe them and why I think the reports of my Chinese friends are reasonable. If you want me to take you seriously, pick apart my arguments. Show me where the flaws are. Go beyond the "it doesn't meet fit my world view" and actually tell me what's wrong with the reasoning.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by dkw:
Anecdotal.

Close, but not quite what I'm going for.
Digging around the wiki on eyewitness testimony, I'm thinking something like confabulation mixed with the miscommunication that I noted earlier.
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
quote:
How do you go about buying cheese on the black market?
In my case, it's indirect. You know the doofballs who know the people who make the cheese. That, or you ask someone to bring it back with them.

Easier to get than ILLEGAL BACK-ALLEY BRIES: european absinthe, pot.
 
Posted by rollainm (Member # 8318) on :
 
I'd just like to mention that Empire of China Restaurant down the street has excellent Mongolian chicken. And fried rice.

Oh, and the spring rolls are simply delicious.

[Smile]
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
quote:
I can't come up with a word for what you mean because I haven't a clue what you might mean by calling my story a "hypothetical situation". My best guess was that you were accusing me of making it up, but you say that wasn't your intent. I don't have a second guess. Its not my responsibility to clearly communicate your ideas.
Not that this is my fight, but I thought it was pretty clear what he meant given the original context. (Confabulation actually doesn't make sense in the original context but makes sense in his point a few posts later. Anecdotal sounds more correct but it wouldn't have quite been proper usage).

In the original statement ("Your hypothetical friends would disagree with my friends"), I think he's saying a) if your friends were to HYPOTHETICALLY meet with his friends, they'd disagree, combined with b) he can think of reasons why you may have misinterpreted what your friends meant. Given that anecdotal evidence isn't that useful to begin with, your conversation with your friends might as well be hypothetical from his perspective. (This is still not quite the right use of the word, but it's close enough and fairly obvious enough that I don't think it merited an attack on his english and a page of multiple 5-paragraph arguments focusing on the notion).

Is his statement technically wrong? Well yeah, but I know what it's like to reach for a word that means something specific and accidentally grab something that "feels" correct even if it's actually not. (i.e. when people say "I was literally going to kill myself if he did not stop singing," they actually mean "virtually" but everyone knows what they meant.
 
Posted by kmbboots (Member # 8576) on :
 
The Rabbit, this confabulating has gone far enough. You don't have any Chinese friends. Mucus knows all of the Chinese people and all of them agree that we suck.

I don't know why you keep insisting on what is clearly a delusion. You must be mad. (You haven't been using any imported toothpaste, have you?)
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Also, while this whole thread is sufficiently bizarre that people can probably isolate the ridiculous context, this is precisely the kind of argument that I think makes the forum intimidating for newbies. What are they supposed to think when they see two people talking about food, and one person uses the wrong word and then gets totally chewed out for "failing to communicate properly?"
 
Posted by kmbboots (Member # 8576) on :
 
Raymond, it isn't so much that he used the wrong word as that he is pretty much calling The Rabbit a liar.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
except that he specified that that's not what he meant, and while there may be history here I don't know about, looking at the last two pages by themselves I see Rabbit making one claim and Mucus making a counterstatement that Rabbit's claim isn't as meaningful as Rabbit thinks it is.

I don't know if Mucus is BSing the "chinese people will agree with you out of politeness" thing (whether true or not, it does seem like the sort of statement that allows for blanket "oh I know what I'm talking about and whatever you say must be wrong" kind of reasoning). That is the point with which Mucus could be calling Rabbit a liar, and if that's what we're worried about then that's what should be focused on, not a word used in an offhand remark.
 
Posted by kmbboots (Member # 8576) on :
 
The claim that Mucus knows more about conversations for which he wasn't present among people he doesn't know than someone who was there is pretty insulting however you look at it. "Confabulation" means that she was making it up. I know that slamming western culture in general and Americans in particular is important to him but this is a bit silly.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kmbboots:
Raymond, it isn't so much that he used the wrong word as that he is pretty much calling The Rabbit a liar.

Only if you completely ignore the very next post which starts with:

quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
... I don't doubt that you had lunch with a Chinese colleague and I don't doubt that you "think" you got agreement with your points.

But I also know that you're dead wrong and the description of a Hong Kong native that would claim that the food in Toronto outranks that in Hong Kong itself is so foreign to my experiences, the best explanation is that your perception of events has totally separated from the reality of what happened.

I'm effectively stating that I believe that The Rabbit believes in good faith that he/she heard what was stated and simultaneously stating that I accept that he/she met with a Chinese colleague. Plus I'm providing an explanation that explains what happened without assuming that Rabbit is lying.

Personally, I was wondering how hostile The Rabbit was because, you know, we're resurrecting a two month old thread with a direct named challenge to me. This is something that I did not state because I don't know what is going on.

But I do know that your mind reading of my motives is simply wrong.
 
Posted by kmbboots (Member # 8576) on :
 
If not lying than delusional. Or stupid. You and she have had different experiences with different people. With all the people in the world, it is entirely possible that both of you are right about your own experiences.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Raymond Arnold: Your interpretation of my post is correct, although I do not know why confabulation does not make sense in the original context.

Otherwise, just some general clarifications.

quote:
Originally posted by Raymond Arnold:
I don't know if Mucus is BSing the "chinese people will agree with you out of politeness" thing

I understand your doubt and I knew that point would be controversial so I provided an impartial link.

quote:
That is the point with which Mucus could be calling Rabbit a liar ...
No, the point of the article is that Chinese people may use white lies out of politeness but that they do not consider it actual lying.

In other words, far from accusing The Rabbit of lying, I am hypothesizing that the Chinese colleague may have done what The Rabbit may consider a lie (but probably should not).

quote:
Originally posted by kmbboots:
"Confabulation" means that she was making it up.

Yes, but the emphasis is on *unconsciously*. I picked the article that I linked to for a reason. It states that everyone may confabulate at times in order to make sense of the world.

quote:
Originally posted by kmbboots:
If not lying than delusional. Or stupid.

Ummm, no. The article states that perfectly healthy individuals may confabulate. It restates this twice.
 
Posted by kmbboots (Member # 8576) on :
 
Why is it that you are more of an expert on The Rabbit's friends than she is?
 
Posted by vonk (Member # 9027) on :
 
I greatly prefer American Chinese food to Chinese Chinese food. I'm a big fan of no heads or feet* in my food (with the exception of soul food). Vietnamese food on the other hand I enjoy a lot.

*distinguishable as heads and feet anyway. If you chop it up and don't call it heads and feet it's another story.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kmbboots:
Why is it that you are more of an expert on The Rabbit's friends than she is?

Why do you think that it is necessary to be an expert on The Rabbit's friends in order to give only one example of a way in which The Rabbit may have miscommunicated with them?
 
Posted by rollainm (Member # 8318) on :
 
Mucus, have you considered that while your suggestion of The Rabbit's friend's intentions may not be considered presumptuous or otherwise offensive by Chinese standards, by typical American cultural standards it is? You are essentially claiming to be a better judge of the motives of her friend - whom you've never met - based on a broad cultural generalization. Do you not see how this can come off as being offensive?

quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
quote:
Originally posted by kmbboots:
Why is it that you are more of an expert on The Rabbit's friends than she is?

Why do you think that it is necessary to be an expert on The Rabbit's friends in order to give only one example of a way in which The Rabbit may have miscommunicated with them?
And here again. You are presuming fault in her communication skills.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Good grief
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
quote:
You are essentially claiming to be a better judge of the motives of her friend - whom you've never met - based on a broad cultural generalization. Do you not see how this can come off as being offensive?
Mucus never claims know what Rabbit's friends were thinking. He merely states a way in which Rabbit may have been misinterpreting them, and because his own experience deviates significantly from Rabbits, he finds it more likely that Rabbit miscommunicated with her friends than that he is wrong. For the most part, I honestly think he communicated that fairly politely, whether or not his opinion is rooted in cultural chauvinism.

I don't know who started the argument and where the burden of proof lies, but claiming that either side has any particular moral high ground at this point seems profoundly silly to me. I also think that, by American standards, "Rabbit might be misconstruing what his friends said" is far less offensive than "Mucus is lying and delusional and stupid." Although that line was said by a third party who you (Rollainm) have not specifically condoned.
 
Posted by rollainm (Member # 8318) on :
 
You are right, Raymond. I shouldn't have said "know". But even the suggestion can easily be take as offensive when it implies greater trust in a generalization than in The Rabbit's communication skills or honesty of her friend. Let me be clear, though, that I'm not trying to dogpile you here, Mucus. I do understand where you're coming from, your frustration with these responses, and why you've reacted the way you have.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
If Rabbit had been discussing something far more personal or important with her friends, I'd consider this insulting. Given that this should be a fairly low key discussion about which food is better, and that Mucus did provide a link to back up his argument, it seems to me that if Rabbit feels Mucus is being unfair, a proper response would be either "um, I think I know my friends just fine, thank you and have a nice day," or to go back to said friends, talk to them some more about this discussion and clarify that Mucus' generalization doesn't apply here.

But getting indignant and offended and launching into a full scale attack on Mucus seems way out of proportion to me.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
You know, my original contention was simply that I know Chinese people who don't agree with Mucus and I gave some examples to illustrate that.

I may being missing Mucus' point entirely but he seems to be saying that I'm either making up these stories, have seriously misunderstood the what my friends said or my Chinese friends are all liars. And since he knows nothing at all about the events in question except what I have said, I can't see why he would doubt their accuracy other than that he's found me to an insufferable liar in the past (which I don't think is the case) or that he finds it unimaginable that anyone Chinese would disagree with him on this issue.

And that is an extremely arrogant assumption, hence my telling him to get of his high horse. If he had claimed that my Chinese friends aren't representative of the majority of Chinese immigrants that would be one thing, and it might even be true, but insisting that my stories couldn't possibly be true is quite another.

But even this is a digression from my original point which I believe was

There isn't a single decent Chinese cheese. [Big Grin]

[ October 01, 2009, 11:35 AM: Message edited by: The Rabbit ]
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
rollainm:
Thank you, I appreciate it.

And in response to your initial question, no, I did not consider it (and I personally have little reason to think that this is due to any cultural difference).
 
Posted by rollainm (Member # 8318) on :
 
Raymond, I haven't commented on the correctness of The Rabbit's response to Mucus, but I don't think it really has anything to do with my point anyway.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
... he seems to be saying that I'm either making up these stories, have seriously misunderstood the what my friends said or my Chinese friends are all liars.

Seriously, the way in which you're using the word "liar" actually makes me wonder more about whether a miscommunication occured, not less.

I will add two more quotes from that linked article (my italics)
quote:
This makes her a fantastic “undercover foreigner” in the sense that she can hang out with Chinese people and they’ll treat her more or less as a cultural insider. She reports that the number one complaint her Mainland friends have against their foreign friends is that foreigners too often think Chinese people are lying to them, when they’re actually being extra considerate to the foreigners.
quote:
Chinese typically express more of their meaning through nonverbal signals than Westerners do – especially Americans. We all make regular use of both verbal and nonverbal forms of communication, but comparatively, Americans are more “tuned in” to the words; Chinese are more tuned in to nonverbal channels.

A style of communication that especially emphasizes nonverbal signals makes it easy to clearly communicate a meaning that is different or opposite of the words’ literal meaning. To Americans, who focus relatively more on the literal meaning and fail to “hear” many of the nonverbal cues, this can easily look like lying.

quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
... unimaginable that anyone Chinese would disagree with him on this issue.

Not unimaginable, merely the best explanation (i.e. the most probable) Remember, I said:
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
... the best explanation is that your perception of events has totally separated from the reality of what happened.

quote:
There isn't a single decent Chinese cheese.
Of course not.
We're like lactose intolerant (in general, not specific) and if you really think about it, milk in the way we consume it is pretty weird anyways.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
If Rabbit had been discussing something far more personal or important with her friends, I'd consider this insulting. Given that this should be a fairly low key discussion about which food is better, and that Mucus did provide a link to back up his argument, it seems to me that if Rabbit feels Mucus is being unfair, a proper response would be either "um, I think I know my friends just fine, thank you and have a nice day," or to go back to said friends, talk to them some more about this discussion and clarify that Mucus' generalization doesn't apply here.
Be fair Raymond. Yes I responded by returning arrogance and thinly veiled insults with more arrogance and thinly veiled insults. The wasn't the most polite thing to do. But its also evident that many people have misunderstood my tone in this discussion. This whole discussion started off as mockery of the OP. The entire thread has been sort of a parody of more serious discussions. At least that's how I perceived it. I'm sorry if other people took it much more seriously than it was ever intended.
 
Posted by scifibum (Member # 7625) on :
 
I think Mucus has been entirely serious, and if your tone was meant to be comedic/parodic, it didn't come across that well, but was also mismatched against Mucus's efforts (as I perceive them).

(Not that I think Mucus thinks this is of vital importance, just that I think Mucus has approached this soberly.)

I don't think Mucus meant to insult your intelligence or doubt your honesty. Just to frame an interpretation of your experiences in a way that makes sense within the context of his own experience and study, which otherwise seems too dissonant.
 
Posted by scifibum (Member # 7625) on :
 
BTW, wanted to check:

quote:
The best brie is made from unpasteurized milk and is not legal to sell in the US.
I have seen raw milk cheese for sale out in the open in a grocery store. Probably about a month ago.

Which is more likely?
1) Some kinds of raw milk cheese are illegal to sell in the US but not others.
2) The store was selling contraband cheese out in the open.
3) The cheese was mislabeled.
(edit:)4) It's not actually illegal to sell raw milk cheese in the US.
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
*nod* I think Mucus was quite legitimately and sincerely offended by the assertion that Chinese food was both better and more diverse in Canada than in China, with little loss of "authenticity." He has been contesting that point since it was made.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
Of course not.
We're like lactose intolerant (in general, not specific) and if you really think about it, milk in the way we consume it is pretty weird anyways

Not an excuse. The lactose content of cheeses is typically very low. In fact, it has been postulated that lactose intolerance is why cheeses were developed in the first place. The process of making cheese separates the milk proteins (which nearly all adult humans can digest) from the lactose which many adult humans can not digest.

And drinking milk isn't objectively any weirder than an awfully lot of the things people eat. Fermented eggs? Rotten cabbage? Plants that are poisonous unless they are properly pre-processed? Poisonous insects? Honey? Tree sap? Tree bark? Live maggots?
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I more or less agree with scifibum. I realize this started out as a joke, but over time the humor became less apparent until it was pretty much indistinguishable from an actual debate. And because I didn't think Mucus had been particularly unfair to begin with, the irony of responding to a silly point with a huge analysis ("Sincerely, Summer Glau") lost its humor.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
scifibum, TomDavidson, Raymond Arnold
Thank you.

quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
Not an excuse. The lactose content of cheeses is typically very low. In fact, it has been postulated that lactose intolerance is why cheeses were developed in the first place.

I've heard a quite different theory. In short, herders and nomads (what would have been called at the time barbarians) did not have access to food as regularly as an agricultural society. Thus, they started to consume milk from their animals. This consumption lead to them to become mutants that could consume milk in adulthood. However, not having proper storage for that milk, they eventually let it spoil, leading to the development of cheese.

Thus, a non-mutant society which has largely skipped this nomadic phase (indeed, stigmatizing it) would not easily develop cheese.

quote:
And drinking milk isn't objectively any weirder than an awfully lot of the things people eat. Fermented eggs? Rotten cabbage? Plants that are poisonous unless they are properly pre-processed? Poisonous insects? Honey? Tree sap? Tree bark? Live maggots?
Well, personally I consider those things pretty weird too. Don't get me wrong, I quite enjoy some of them, but they are "weird" and non-obvious cultural developments which in part explains why different societies took them on at different rates.

However, I think there is a special place for milk (and by extension cheese), not on a binary classification of things that are weird or not weird, but on a (understandably debatable) floating point line of weirdness. The poisonous and spoiled foods are relatable in times of famine or lack of food, you gotta do what you gotta do. I have heard of peasants that during the Cultural Revolution were reduced to eating tree bark given the lack of real food.

Consider though, while it is reasonable for children to drink their mother's milk, we do not generally drink our mother's milk, nor other humans's milk which would reasonably be considered to be similar. Not even a monkey's milk.

No, we grab cows, goats, camels, and suck on them. But then get this, rather than drink it fresh, sometimes you spoil it on purpose. Oy.

(And don't get me wrong. I love cheese, especially on pasta, although I'm not picky about it)
 
Posted by scifibum (Member # 7625) on :
 
It actually seems to me that drinking milk from herd animals reflects a lack of hunger. You are getting a little bit of nutrition instead of killing and eating the whole animal. In famine, you kill the milk cow.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Well, it is not quite a hunger issue and it wouldn't be a cow to start with. It would be a horse or a goat. And rather than let the milk go to waste, you're eating it.

But a big point of going to an agricultural way of life is to gain a much richer and more regular source of food and thats what the herders and hunters would need to compete with.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
I don't think Mucus meant to insult your intelligence or doubt your honesty. Just to frame an interpretation of your experiences in a way that makes sense within the context of his own experience and study, which otherwise seems too dissonant.
Between you and Raymond and Tom and and rollaim, I really am starting to feel like I'm being unfairly dog piled here.

Mucus didn't say I had likely misunderstood or misinterpreted my friend until quite far into this discussion. He called the story I reported "hypothetical". When I said I couldn't figure out what he meant by hypothetical unless he meant I was making up the story, he still didn't clarify by saying he thought their had likely been a miscommuncation or that I had interpretted my friends polite conversation too literally. Instead, he said that hypotherical was the right word and I was "Dead Wrong about what my colleague had said. When I insisted that hypothetical wasn't the right word, he told me to come up with a word myself, and when I further insisted I really didn't know what he meant unless was accusing me of making the story up, the word he picked was "confabulation", which to my ears is just another synonym for "made up" . Was it really irrational of me to presume he was accusing me of making the whole thing up, of lying to make a point in this discussion? Was I really that far out to react as through he had insult my intelligence, my sanity and my integrity?

It was only after being pressed, not only by me, that he even mentioned the possibility of misunderstanding or the cultural differences between what is polite in China and the US as a possible reason to believe I might have misunderstood. Up until that point it was a simple of matter of "I know Chinese people so well that I know your story can't be true".

I really had no intention of offending Mucus. If Mucus is seriously offended by the claim that some people, even some Chinese people, have a very different opinion on the Chinese food in Toronto than he does -- he's the one who needs to take a few steps back and get some perspective.

I think I understand where Mucus is coming from. I understand why it would be irritating and offensive to have some one try to "teach" you something about your own culture. And I agree that Mucus' opinion on Chinese culture should get more respect than the opinions of your average American. But Mucus also needs to recognize that he is not the only Chinese person I've ever talked to. He isn't the foremost expert on China I know personally. When he says things that contradict what I have heard from China experts and Chinese immigrants I know personally, I am going to point it out. If he expects to place more weight on his assessments on China than Blayne's or my own, that's completely reasonable. But if he expects me to place more weight on his Chinese opinions than the opinions of other Chinese people I know in real life, he is being unreasonable. If he is offended by my truthful reporting that what I have heard from other Chinese people contradicts what he is saying, he's just out of line.
 
Posted by scifibum (Member # 7625) on :
 
Oh, I think all Mucus meant was "dead wrong" was that Toronto has better Chinese food. Since you pretty much got behind this opinion he was saying he emphatically disagrees with you.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by scifibum:
Oh, I think all Mucus meant was "dead wrong" was that Toronto has better Chinese food. Since you pretty much got behind this opinion he was saying he emphatically disagrees with you.

I suspect that it is easier to see it that way when you are not the one whose veracity is being attacked. But beyond that, I never actually claimed Toronto had better Chinese food, I claimed my Chinese colleague had expressed that opinion and Mucus seemed to be rejecting there was even a remote possibility a Chinese person might hold that opinion.

Furthermore, if you are correct about Mucus' intent, using the phrase "dead wrong" about something as utterly subjective as "better Chinese food" goes beyond hyperbole.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by scifibum:
Oh, I think all Mucus meant was "dead wrong" was that Toronto has better Chinese food. Since you pretty much got behind this opinion he was saying he emphatically disagrees with you.

And furthermore, you made it quite clear earlier that you think I misinterpreted Mucus' intent. I'm willing to accept that. But my question, as I tried to state in the previous post, is not about what Mucus actually meant, it is about what he actually said.
And given what he actually said, do you really think his intent was clearly communicated and that it was completely irrational for me to understand his words as an attack on my truthfulness?
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Yeah, the "Dead Wrong" part was the one point where I did feel Mucus was pretty rude and was probably the point that exacerbated most of this.

quote:
Was it really irrational of me to presume he was accusing me of making the whole thing up, of lying to make a point in this discussion?
I didn't think your initial reaction was irrational (I think you jumped the gun a bit criticizing his grasp of the english language but I understand why you felt under attack at the time), but he did keep trying to clarify that he was having trouble finding a particular word with particular nuance: that there was probably a misunderstanding that was neither your fault nor your friends, but which nonetheless led to you having an incorrect belief.

He tried a number of ways to explain this, each of which made sense to me, and then found the word confabulation which was pretty close. But rather than see the nuance he was going for, you focused on the "made up" part, and that was where it looked as if you had become so focused on the perceived insult that you had given up on actually understanding what Mucus was trying to say. By that point I couldn't imagine Mucus saying anything else to try and clarify his point, so that's where I decided to try and help him out.

I didn't mean to end up counter-dogpiling you. But I think if you were to take a step back and look at this from a neutral perspective, you wouldn't see Mucus' remarks as nearly so insulting.

The point that I think IS important, which I touched upon a while back, is that this is precisely the kind of debate that, no matter how silly you're intending it to be, ends up looking very intimidating to a newbie. In the "whatever happened to Hatrack" threads, everyone bemoans the decline of the forum and how "certain posters" are making things worse, without realizing that they have contributed as well. You are generally one of the more thoughtful and fairminded people here, but I think it's important (for everyone) to realize how easy it is to transition into an intense, aggressive argument - even when it is not anybody's fault, and be able to realize when its happening and take a step back.
 
Posted by scifibum (Member # 7625) on :
 
It's probably unfair of me to weigh in and then decline to engage with follow up discussion, but...I just don't have it in me to re-read and reassess in order to respond with sufficient thought to your last couple of posts, Rabbit. I'm sorry. I can see things from your point of view, I think. I didn't mean to dogpile on you, FWIW.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Fake edit: I can see how if you had misinterpreted the initial dead wrong statement that Mucus' attempts to clarify would have seen far less sincere. I'm not sure whether I think the Dead Wrong statement was poorly communicated or if it just happened to combine with the bad use of "hypothetical" to make it seem that way. Either way I did think it was unnecessarily inflammatory.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by scifibum:
BTW, wanted to check:

quote:
The best brie is made from unpasteurized milk and is not legal to sell in the US.
I have seen raw milk cheese for sale out in the open in a grocery store. Probably about a month ago.

Which is more likely?
1) Some kinds of raw milk cheese are illegal to sell in the US but not others.
2) The store was selling contraband cheese out in the open.
3) The cheese was mislabeled.
(edit:)4) It's not actually illegal to sell raw milk cheese in the US.

Here is what I could find.

quote:
According to federal law, raw milk cannot be transported across state lines with the intent of human consumption. Unpasteurized cheeses are actually legal, as long as they have been aged at least 60 days in an environment held at 35 degrees Fahrenheit (1 degree Celsius). During the aging process, the cheese becomes more acidic, killing most potential sources of bacterial infection.
Am guessing that the two most likely explanations.

1. The cheese was aged more the 60 days so it was legal in the US.

2. The cheese was locally made and your state has more lenient regulations than the federal guidelines. Unless it was imported from outside the US or transported across state boundaries, it doesn't have to comply with federal law.


From what I understand, Brie in France must be aged under 5 weeks. So real French raw milk Brie isn't legal in the US.
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
Unless it's made here, presumably.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by rivka:
Unless it's made here, presumably.

Well it isn't real French Brie if its made here. There might be a pretty good facsimile of french brie made some where in the US. But pretty much by definition, if its made here it ain't real French Brie.
 
Posted by Jhai (Member # 5633) on :
 
Stepping in a bit late here, I'd like to point out that Mucus hasn't actually addressed the core argument that The Rabbit posted last page - which is that basically there are areas of the US which have a high enough and diverse enough population of Chinese to support top-notch resturants.

The statistics Mucus used to guesstimate the relative spread of Chinese citizens in the US don't really prove his point, either. Immigrant populations in the US are not often found within cities, except in the case of NYC. Instead, they're found in the suburbs around cities. Thus, there aren't really that many Chinese immigrants in San Francisco proper. But there are certainly enough Chinese immigrants in the whole of the Bay Area to support a few world-class Chinese restaurants.

To support with anecdotal evidence, I grew up on the border of Sunnyvale & Cupertino, and the closest two shopping centers to my home were entirely dominated by Chinese/Taiwanese grocery stores, restaurants, and shops. There was one British pub at one, and a dance studio at the other, and every other store had its sign in both Chinese & English - or just Chinese. My high school Chinese friends - all of whom were 1st-generation immigrants from Taiwan, Hong Kong, or mainland China - said to a one that the Taiwanese noodle shop around the corner from my house served better noodles than they had ever had back home. We went at least once a week for a late lunch after class once the oldest of us got a driving license.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
quote:
Well it isn't real French Brie if its made here. There might be a pretty good facsimile of french brie made some where in the US. But pretty much by definition, if its made here it ain't real French Brie.
There is a certain irony here, and I can't tell whether it was intentional.

I would like to say (perhaps a bit late) that I like American Brie fine but don't think it's the best thing in the world, which probably means I'd make a good test subject for Samprimary's earlier hypothesis that an American who thought Brie was "alright" would be impressed by French Brie.

I do not like Swiss or goat cheese in the slightest.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
There is a certain irony here, and I can't tell whether it was intentional.
Not really. I am unaware of any standards that restrict what can be called genuine Chinese cuisine. But France has all kinds of laws that define very specifically what foods can be called genuine french X, and to be called Brie, it doesn't simply have to be made in France -- it has to be made in a particular region of france. In fact the difference between Camembert and Brie is solely the region in which they are made, which results in very subtle differences in the milk, the bacteria and the molds. And these in turn result in subtle differences in the cheese which cheese connoiseurs will tell you are noticeable. In France, the distinctive characteristics of food that come from the subtle differences in soil, water, yeast, and bacteria that are unique to a given region, or even a given vineyard or cheese factory, are really important. That is why the typical grocery in France offers so many different cheese.

Maybe there are foods like that in China. If so, then I can see justification for claiming that you can't get authentic X outside of a specific regions of China. But if that's true, it hasn't been argued yet.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Fair enough.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
Oh, I should also add that simply because something isn't "real French Brie" does not mean it isn't as good or even better than "real Brie". I'm completely willing to entertain the possibility that someone somewhere in the US is making a soft raw milk Brie style cheese that is very good. And if someone reported that a French friend thought the Brie style cheese made locally somewhere in North America was even better than the authentic French Brie, I'd very interested in trying a sample of the cheese.
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
But France has all kinds of laws that define very specifically what foods can be called genuine french X, and to be called Brie, it doesn't simply have to be made in France -- it has to be made in a particular region of france.

Ah, I knew that was true for wine, but didn't realize it was true for cheese too.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
Not really. I am unaware of any standards that restrict what can be called genuine Chinese cuisine. But France has all kinds of laws that define very specifically what foods can be called genuine ...

Technically, this is less an indication that there aren't standards for what is called Chinese cuisine rather than simply that mainland China isn't exactly a nation of laws, for the obvious reasons. Thus, on the whole, it hasn't really got around to this kind of thing.

I know Japan is starting this kind of thing and I expect that China will eventually too, for better or for worse.

quote:
Officials in Tokyo, concerned that diners around the globe are getting a less-than-genuine taste of their nation's cuisine, are devising a sort of bureaucratic Zagat guide that will confer a stamp of authenticity on restaurants that meet the government's standards.

In California, where Asian cuisines are mixed and matched in a blender of ethnicities and subcultures, the plan could be a recipe for contention. Only about 10% of the state's 3,000 Japanese restaurants are Japanese-owned, with many now operated by Koreans, Chinese and Vietnamese.

That has left some local restaurateurs wondering whether nationality could become a litmus test for authenticity.

That said, I'm fairly dubious about the idea that trying to enforce these kind of things is really a good thing.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jhai:
But there are certainly enough Chinese immigrants in the whole of the Bay Area to support a few world-class Chinese restaurants.

As I said, I think I can accept the idea that there are two metropolitan areas in the US that have a sufficient Chinese population to at least be arguably in the same ballpark as Toronto.

But there are two different assertions that are of interest after resurrecting the thread.

quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
... you can very frequently get better Chinese food in North America than you find in China.

This is the one I found the most dubious. First, if we're accepting of the fact that there are only 2 out of 52 states that even have food that is even debatable to be in the same neighbourhood as Toronto or Vancouver, then this is pretty hefty. It means even any backwater province in China has better Chinese food than 96% of America and that is without even bringing out the heavy hitters like Hong Kong, Shanghai, or Beijing.

This to me is not frequent. It means I could say something like "you can very frequently travel by high-speed rail in the US" or I can frequently buy Betamax videos in stores. I can understand the relative nature of this though.

On the other hand, a "few world-class restaurants"? Sure. No problem.

quote:
He said this was both because better quality ingredients are available in North America and because one can find foods from all regions of China in north American cities where as in China one tends to find regional dishes only in their region.
First, I don't accept the premise that better quality ingredients are available in North America. Chinese food evolved with ingredients that were available in the area, ingredients that even now tend to be exported in great quantity to support overseas demand. But shipping cuts into freshness and Chinese food relies on freshness.

For example, high standards for freshness explain why wet markets survive in Hong Kong while even less fresh supermarkets can shut down in New York leaving whole areas with little fresh food.

quote:
New York may be a foodie paradise, but it’s also full of food deserts. So says the city’s planning department, which last year reported that some three million New Yorkers live in neighborhoods with few fresh food options. Traditional groceries and supermarkets have shut down, to be replaced by fast food and drug store chains.
...
The government’s involvement in turn reflects a cultural value. As I toured the wet markets with my 20-something translator and her 73-year-old grandmother, the older woman explained: it’s the freshness that supermarkets couldn’t beat. Hong Kong’s Cantonese cuisine (much lighter than what you’ll find in most American Chinese restaurants) depends on fresh ingredients, and local standards are high. The grandmother pointed out what “fresh” meant: live fish, not chilled; poultry still warm from slaughter; vegetables not wrapped in plastic.

Marketing studies back up this explanation. They also note that wet-market standards of freshness will likely survive the recent privatization, even if some of the markets do not.

http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/11/food-deserts-a-guest-post/

Sometimes it simply means that certain local foods do not get exported because they are not optimal for long distance transport.
quote:
This little town, a 90-minute train ride west of Shanghai, is a world away from Georgia. There's no Peachtree Street, no peach pie, no peach ice cream. About all Yangshan has are the juiciest, most delicious peaches on earth.
...
Yet in an age when Australian lamb and Kobe beef from Japan wing their way around the world, most Asian fruits remain thousands of miles from U.S. kitchens.
...
In the U.S., peach technology produces a very different product. "It's unfortunate that many of our peaches are bred to have superior shelf life and exterior color," says Karen Caplan, chief executive of Frieda's Inc., a Los Alamitos, Calif., high-end distributor of imported and domestic produce. "The growers don't focus on flavor. They refrigerate them in transit, put them on the shelf, and they go mealy."

"The whole fruit industry in this country is about decorating stores," says John Driver, a Modesto, Calif., apricot grower who sends his fruit to farmers markets around San Francisco. "They're looking for size, color and hardness, but people don't want to eat the things."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203946904574300192082040918.html

I could probably find more, but thats what I have come across in recent memory.
 
Posted by malanthrop (Member # 11992) on :
 
We've gone past cigarettes and moved on to soft drinks as the demon of national health, next is cheese. Cheese lovers, get ready to pay your fair share. [Smile]
 


Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2