This is topic Anyone see Card's Taming of the Shrew? in forum Books, Films, Food and Culture at Hatrack River Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.hatrack.com/ubb/main/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=047546

Posted by Launchywiggin (Member # 9116) on :
 
I'm only 2 hours away and I think I'm gonna go this Saturday. Is there anyone else here in the area of Southwest Virginia that will be there? For that matter, does anybody here actually GO to SVU?

I'm sure it'll be a great watch...but really...

I'm just hoping to see OSC in real life for the first time. [Smile]
 
Posted by Alex Johansen (Member # 9090) on :
 
your lucky, i wanna see him in real life.

id make an ass of myself though [Frown]

id run up to him and like unbutton my shirt and tell him to sign my chest (AND IM A GUYYYYYYYY)
 
Posted by Liz B (Member # 8238) on :
 
[SUBLIMINAL] OSC wants you to use capitals and apostrophes [/SUBLIMINAL]
 
Posted by Will B (Member # 7931) on :
 
I'm considering it. (Going to see Shrew, not asking OSC to sign my chest!)
 
Posted by Scott R (Member # 567) on :
 
I don't know that ANY production of Taming of the Shrew can compete with the Moonlighting version.
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Scott R:
I don't know that ANY production of Taming of the Shrew can compete with the Moonlighting version.

This is so true.

I have to say, I never would have pegged you as a Moonlighting fan. Especially given the current target of your engine-doohickey.
 
Posted by Scott R (Member # 567) on :
 
The fact that Maddie and Dave jumped the shark, in a manner of speaking, is one of the seminal reasons why California's at the top of the list.

No show that good should be allowed to lose the main tension point.

Moonlighting was my first taste of real Hollywood facilitated disappointement. I was young, tender, and vulnerable.

I want my childhood back. And Ms. DiPesto.
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
He was always David, never "Dave." And it didn't jump the shark -- it was shoved across it by idiot writers. OTOH, "no show that good should be allowed to lose the main tension point"??? What, they should have continued lusting after each other, unrequited, forever?

The problem is not that they finally got together. It's that the writers couldn't figure out what to do with them afterwards. Unfortunately a common affliction; it killed Lois&Clark too. Hollywood writers have no idea what to do with a happily married couple -- insufficient angst. [Razz]
 
Posted by Scott R (Member # 567) on :
 
quote:
they should have continued lusting after each other, unrequited, forever?
Yes. Pain is good.

quote:
Hollywood writers have no idea what to do with a happily married couple -- insufficient angst.
I don't disagree with you. But the success of the show relied so much on the friction between them, they could never be happy together and have it be the same show.
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
Scott, please remind the viewing audience at home: are you single?

quote:
Originally posted by Scott R:
But the success of the show relied so much on the friction between them, they could never be happy together and have it be the same show.

1) So have them still squabble. Heavens knows squabbling married couple shows often survive many seasons.
2) Maybe not the same show. But it didn't have to be a worse one, either. The death of that show was entirely self-fulfilling prophecy in action.
 
Posted by Scott R (Member # 567) on :
 
quote:
1) So have them still squabble. Heavens knows squabbling married couple shows often survive many seasons.
I don't watch those shows.

quote:
2) Maybe not the same show. But it didn't have to be a worse one, either. The death of that show was entirely self-fulfilling prophecy in action.
Okay.
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Scott R:
quote:
1) So have them still squabble. Heavens knows squabbling married couple shows often survive many seasons.
I don't watch those shows.
Actually, neither do I usually.
 
Posted by Storm Saxon (Member # 3101) on :
 
You guys should have some kind of Will & Grace show. Scott could be the kooky, uptight Mormon, and Rivka could be the wacky Jew. It'd be hilarious, I tells ya.
 
Posted by Scott R (Member # 567) on :
 
She's a Jewish forensic scientist, with a penchant for helping kids straighten out their lives...He's a Mormon leipidopterist who moonlights as a vigilante super hero...

Together, they eat babies!
 
Posted by Storm Saxon (Member # 3101) on :
 
Heh, heh.
 
Posted by gsim1337 (Member # 10168) on :
 
Funny, my English class just start learning about Taming of the Shrew and poof, there's and OSC version of it.

I may send the script to her in an e-mail...
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Scott R:
Together, they eat babies!

Except you always use too much salt. >_<
 
Posted by Lord Of All Fools (Member # 3841) on :
 
Yes, but it's KOSHER salt.

[Big Grin]

Come on. You saw that coming.
 
Posted by Will B (Member # 7931) on :
 
It was hilarious. I don't know what the original version was like, but this one had me (and the rest of the audience) rolling.
 
Posted by Launchywiggin (Member # 9116) on :
 
I totally agree. The rewritten parts were absolutely hilarious while never detracting from the style. OSC's direction was also spot on, with very well-choreographed timing and action.

And yes--I got to meet Mr. Card himself. Totally cool.
 
Posted by Dark as night (Member # 9577) on :
 
Lucky!!! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Will B (Member # 7931) on :
 
I didn't go thru extensively, but at least some of Sly's comments were *added* by OSC. The one about the cats made the play, for me!
 


Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2