This is topic Theres a new element sitting at the table in forum Books, Films, Food and Culture at Hatrack River Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.hatrack.com/ubb/main/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=045509

Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/10/17/new.element.ap/index.html

The new synthetic element is being placed under in the periodic table Radon. Its one of those elements where scientists fire a proton into the nucleus of another element and it exists for a fraction of a second. Either way, throw away your old periodic tables [Wink]
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
Don't throw your old one out yet. It won't be added to the table until a second research group confirms it.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
Did not know that, I thought it was pretty much a done deal.
 
Posted by Frisco (Member # 3765) on :
 
quote:
Theres a new element sitting at the table
Neon Flakes! Brighten your day with this noble new breakfast cereal!
 
Posted by Tante Shvester (Member # 8202) on :
 
As I understand, these things happen periodically.
 
Posted by TheGrimace (Member # 9178) on :
 
this has bugged me for a while... while it's in principle true that these new elements technically can exist, most all of those that are in the range of 110+ are more or less useless to all but a few hundred particle physicists in the world...

I fully accept that the experiments that lead to these can be very valuable in furthering our knowledge of science, but if my periodic table stops at 100 it is going to have no impact in my life versus another one that claims those new elements that are only man-made and can only survive for 0.000001 seconds before decomposing back to something more reasonable.
 
Posted by King of Men (Member # 6684) on :
 
Well, in the first place, there should according to the theory be an 'island of stability' just above the elements we can make today, where the nuclei might last as long as half a minute (if I recall correctly) before decaying. So if we can do that, it's an important test of the theory that we apply to 'more reasonable' nuclei, which has implications for fusion and whatnot. In the second place, well, either you think knowledge is a good thing in itself, or you don't. If you dont, sorry, can't convince you.
 
Posted by King of Men (Member # 6684) on :
 
Oh, and by the way, this is not particle physics, it is *sniff* nuclear physics. Not really our kind of people at all, I'm afraid.
 
Posted by Dan_raven (Member # 3383) on :
 
Actually Grimace, each of these elements offer new and intriguing properties. This one reversed male pattern baldness, stopped global warming, created world peace, and allowed the Dixie Chicks to actually sing in Harmony. For that one small part of a second all that occured.

We are feeling much better now.

Actually there were theories that due to the geometics involved, there may be plateaus where some of these uber-elements may be stable, or have half-lives longer than a McDonald's commercial.
 
Posted by Bob_Scopatz (Member # 1227) on :
 
[Laugh] Dan!

[Big Grin]
 
Posted by Icarus (Member # 3162) on :
 
The Dixie Chicks don't sing in harmony? [Confused]
 
Posted by TheGrimace (Member # 9178) on :
 
oh yes Dan, I'm fully aware of the amazing possibilities because of these new elements. Really I'm not trying to argue against their discovery or even against their inclusion of the periodic table per-se. It's more an argument against the kind of people that I've met frequently that seem to think that it's a big deal to update the periodic tables in all the public schools with these new elements as soon as they come out etc...

it's kinda like saying that approximating pi to 3.14159 is wrong because we know it out to umpteen hundred digits...
 
Posted by orlox (Member # 2392) on :
 
Nova on Island of Stability

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sciencenow/3313/02.html
 
Posted by quidscribis (Member # 5124) on :
 
Hey, in one of my novels, I have a stable element at around 252 on the periodic table. [Big Grin] Cuz I can... Well, sorta stable - it does get moody from time to time. [Razz]
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by quidscribis:
[Big Grin] Cuz I can...

Sure. It does mean the story is fantasy, but that's ok.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Californium, that which this new thing is primarily made out of, is used for:

quote:
neutron startup source for some nuclear reactors, calibrating instrumentation
treatment of certain cervical and brain cancers where other radiation therapy is ineffective
radiography of aircraft to detect metal fatigue
airport neutron-activation detectors of explosives
neutron moisture gauges used to find water and petroleum layers in oil wells
portable neutron source in gold and silver prospecting for on-the-spot analysis

Curium, from which Californium is made:

quote:
There are few commercial applications for curium but it may one day be useful in radioisotope thermoelectric generators. Curium bio-accumulates in bone tissue where its radiation destroys bone marrow and thus stops red blood cell creation.

A rare earth homolog, curium is somewhat chemically similar to gadolinium but with a more complex crystal structure. Chemically reactive, its metal is silvery-white in color and the element is more electropositive than aluminium (most trivalent curium compounds are slightly yellow).

Curium has been studied greatly as a potential fuel for Radioisotope thermoelectric generators. Curium-242 can generate up to 120 watts of thermal energy per gram (W/g); its very short half-life though makes it undesirable as a power source for long-term use. Curium-242 is the precursor to plutonium-238 which is the most common fuel for RTGs. Curium-244 has also been studied as an energy source for RTGs having a maximum energy density ~3 W/g, but produces a large amount of neutron radiation from spontaneous fission. Curium-243 with a ~30 year half-life and good energy density of ~1.6 W/g would seem to make an ideal fuel, but it produces significant amounts of gamma and beta radiation from radioactive decay products.

There's a lot more for the other "made up" elements. They have plenty of uses, many of them, or at least combined, but part of the problem also is that most of them haven't been produced in high enough quantity to even test to find out if they have uses. This new element never would have been discovered if the Americans hadn't given the Russians that small amount of Californium to experiment with.

Poor little newbie elements.
 
Posted by HollowEarth (Member # 2586) on :
 
Yeah, they don't know the first thing about being an element.
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
Oooh, time for another Tom Lehrer song:

quote:
There's antimony, arsenic, aluminum, selenium,
And hydrogen and oxygen and nitrogen and rhenium,
And nickel, neodymium, neptunium, germanium,
And iron, americium, ruthenium, uranium...

... these are the only ones of which the news has come to Haaaaaarvard;
There may be many others but they haven't been discoooovered!

Dum duddle dum dum, dum dum!


 


Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2