This is topic Doctor.... Who? in forum Books, Films, Food and Culture at Hatrack River Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.hatrack.com/ubb/main/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=045008

Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
Wow the new Who series looks pretty good from the random episodes and the 2nd seasion season finally I saw.

I am constantly amused who they to keep continuality they kept all the old props.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
What is the second sentence there supposed to mean, Blayne?
 
Posted by Boris (Member # 6935) on :
 
My "incoherant teenager typing" translator may be busted, but I think he said he's impressed that they're using the original props for Dr Who.
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
I think the "who" is a how, and there are a couple of commas missing, so the sentance reads a bit like this:

quote:
I am constantly amused how, to keep continuity, they kept all the old props.
Blayne: do you mean from the 'first' (2005) season? If so, why shouldn't they? It's essentially the same show. The fact that the Doctor is played by a different man is just a quirk.

Also, would it kill you to put the commas in? Please try! [Smile]
 
Posted by Alcon (Member # 6645) on :
 
Well, they also kept all the old props from the original bajillion seasons. Spruced up a very little bit in some cases, but mostly the same.
 
Posted by Shepherd (Member # 7380) on :
 
What did Blayne say? I didn't get either sentence.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
The gist of the first sentence is that the new Dr. Who series looks pretty good, given what he's seen.

Teshi's got it for the second sentence, I'm pretty sure--the "who" being intended as "how" helps the whole thing make a bit more sense.
 


Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2