Naturally, portraying Michael Jackson as a pervert and/or freaky looking person in movies is fine because, well, he's a pervert of course.
Edit:
In otherwords, parody and humor of people like this isn't anything new, but its more acceptible for people to stand up for people like Clinton and Rice.
[ June 08, 2004, 07:37 PM: Message edited by: T_Smith ]
Posted by aspectre (Member # 2222) on :
The stuff about Michael was always intended to be cutting.
Whereas, would Rice or Clinton do anything other than laugh?