This is topic Paying for College Education, Parental Duty? in forum Books, Films, Food and Culture at Hatrack River Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.hatrack.com/ubb/main/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=021688

Posted by BannaOj (Member # 3206) on :
 
This stems from the other thread. I have a lot to say on the subject but need to get out of here so I can get to dkw's!

So discuss amongst yourself until that time!

AJ
 
Posted by Suneun (Member # 3247) on :
 
If the parents have the money, then they should offer to pay for college. In fact, they should offer to pay for all living expenses pre-vocation if they can.

Kid can get a job if he/she wants, but I don't believe in this whole "be independent asap" route that some parents do.
 
Posted by PSI Teleport (Member # 5545) on :
 
I think parents should help in any way they can, if they can. Unless the kids are really evil or ungreatful or something.
 
Posted by UofUlawguy (Member # 5492) on :
 
I don't think parents have any obligation, moral or otherwise, to pay for college. My wife thinks otherwise, so I may end up paying anyway.
 
Posted by MidnightBlue (Member # 6146) on :
 
I don't think parents "should" pay for their kids' college educations, but I'm definitely not against it. I think for some kids it's good because they need to learn how to do things for themselves and if someone else paid they wouldn't try, but for other people it they might have to work so hard to pay for their education they don't have time to keep up with their studies. I think it really differs by family.

That said, my parents are going to pay for my college education, for which I am very grateful.
 
Posted by PSI Teleport (Member # 5545) on :
 
Yeah, I don't think they HAVE to but I think it's a good idea and a nice thing to do.

I hope to help my kids with school.
 
Posted by Da_Goat (Member # 5529) on :
 
I think they should if they can, but they shouldn't have to. In other words, I don't think they should turn it into a legal issue. On the same token, however, I don't think children should be forced to go, either.

[ February 20, 2004, 05:24 PM: Message edited by: Da_Goat ]
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
I think it's good for parents to contribute to their kid's college education if they can. But I think too many kids expect it.

College students should work in the summers and contribute that money toward school, not spring break trips to Cancun. It amazes me how little some college students know about managing their money, mainly because they've never had to distinguish between a need and a want.

Dagonee
*steps down off the soapbox.
 
Posted by katharina (Member # 827) on :
 
I loved my parents method.

As long we are in school, they will pay living expenses. If we live at home, that's our choice, but if we live somewhere else, they'll pay rent, food, and health insurance.

We pay tuition.

This was supposed to inspire us to get scholarships and to value our education. They also severly discouraged taking out student loans until grad school.

This setup lasted until we got our bachelor's or got married. The theory was that we should be able to take care of ourselves with a college degree, and if you want to get married, you are independent completely and need to take care of yourself.

My dad stuck to it. When my brother didn't go to school the last two semesters before he left for Mexico, my dad made him pay rent - $600 a month for room, board, and use of the car. The idea was to make it just as expensive to live at home as to get your own place unless you're working towards something. There was certainly leeway, but not a whole lot.

My dad did put all the money in a bank account to give to my brother when he gets back, so he has tuition money, but he was still out that much at the beginnig of each month.

On the other hand... we all went to schools with subsidized tuition. If I'd gotten accepted to Stanford, they might have helped more.

Added: When my brother was paying rent, he was 18. It sounds harsher than it was though, because he had a guaranteed job - he worked for my dad. Manual labor. All the horrid stuff he couldn't persuade employees to do. I think those jobs (we all had them) were designed to inspire us to do something else.

[ February 20, 2004, 05:28 PM: Message edited by: katharina ]
 
Posted by PSI Teleport (Member # 5545) on :
 
quote:
College students should work in the summers and contribute that money toward school, not spring break trips to Cancun
I think this is true.

BUT I also think that good money management should be taught long before entering college, so that at that point it wouldn't even be an issue.
 
Posted by Suneun (Member # 3247) on :
 
Unfortunately, I spent my summers conducting research, which pays very little (about enough to pay for rent/food for the months I'm working).

Anyhow. I don't think anyone would try to legislate, here. But if a parent has lots (read: upper middle class) of money lying around, but refuses to help their child pay a 20k+/year education, that's silly.
 
Posted by jeniwren (Member # 2002) on :
 
I'll be happy and proud to pay my kids way through school if they choose to go to college. We've been saving money to make that possible.

But I'll only do it as long as I think it's good for them -- if I get the impression from them that they're taking it for granted or are in any other way learning to be irresponsible by our paying their way, we'll stop.

I'm hopeful that we can go through some of the common pitfalls of that time earlier rather than later. We're about ready to help my son open his first checking account (he's 10). He recently ordered a subscription that requires payment by mail, so he'll need to get a checking account to start paying his own bills. I figure this will be a great learning experience, and am hoping that if he learns to balance his checkbook now, that will be something he won't have to discover the hard way as a young adult. Better to bounce a check on a stupid monthly subscription than on his tuition or rent. [Smile] We'll see how it goes.
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
quote:
BUT I also think that good money management should be taught long before entering college, so that at that point it wouldn't even be an issue.
Amen! I touched on this in the bankruptcy thread - the consumer credit crisis is going to blow up in all our faces soon.
 
Posted by katharina (Member # 827) on :
 
quote:
But I'll only do it as long as I think it's good for them -- if I get the impression from them that they're taking it for granted or are in any other way learning to be irresponsible by our paying their way, we'll stop.
My opinion: Don't make it conditional on what you think their attitude is. It can be horribly stressfull to not know whether or not you can count on your parent's for money, and even worse to have things fall through because it turns out you can't when you thought you could. If you're going to do it, I'd make it separate.

If you want some leeway, establish a lower baseline, and then you can always add. That's much better than promising something that may or may not happen - even if it's for a good reason.
 
Posted by Jon Boy (Member # 4284) on :
 
My parents have wanted to help out with our college expenses, but they simply haven't had the money. And even if they had tons of money, they probably still would have wanted me to work summers to save up as much as I could, and then they would have helped with whatever I couldn't afford.

Fortunately, through a combination of grants, some small scholarships, work, and a couple very modest student loans, I haven't needed help from my parents. I think getting a job and being independent is important (and it's absolutely essential at some point), but I don't know if it's necessary during college.
 
Posted by Jeni (Member # 1454) on :
 
Actually, I'd say the government does expect parents to help pay their children's education. When you file for financial aid, that's pretty clear.

Also, even responsible money management doesn't help much. It's difficult to find a job that pays more than six or seven dollars an hour when you'll only be around for three months, or only on weekends. Not to mention the future cost of having to work at, say, Walmart and passing up on research or internship opportunities that are normally unpaid.
 
Posted by pooka (Member # 5003) on :
 
There was a bankruptcy thread? You mean the FICO thread?

I'll echo Jeniwren that I think it would be a priviledge to help my children with college. But my parents provided for us as long as we maintained a good GPA. My husband's family let them live at home for free.

We had a rather shocking conversation, not until we'd been married 9 years or so, that was the first I knew that he didn't want to pay for kid's college. But then, his parents guilted him into going to college. Sometimes I think he's posting as Robespierre on the sly. He would say that if they have to work for it, they will value it more.
 
Posted by Jon Boy (Member # 4284) on :
 
quote:
Actually, I'd say the government does expect parents to help pay their children's education. When you file for financial aid, that's pretty clear.
I've always hated that. They always assume that my dad is making enough to give me a couple thousand a year for school, when I'm really getting nothing. But is there any way to tell them that I'm on my own financially? Of course not.
 
Posted by jeniwren (Member # 2002) on :
 
kat, I'm not close enough to it yet to know where the line is, but I will say I try not to be capricious with my children. If it appeared to us that our paying for their education was bad for them, we'd communicate with them about it and give them time to make alternate plans.

My daughter isn't even two yet and she knows what makes Mom and Dad happy. I imagine that adding another 16 years will do quite a bit to clarify it for her, so that when she's ready for college, she'll know pretty well what will keep the gravy train rolling.
 
Posted by Suneun (Member # 3247) on :
 
While having to work hard to pay for your own education may be enlightening, or character-building, I don't think it necessarily means one will be more financially independent or financially successful in the future.
 
Posted by Kasie H (Member # 2120) on :
 
Hmm.

Interesting.

I guess in my house going to college was never really considered an *option*; that's just the way it was. I *never* questioned the fact that I would go to college. And there was never really any question that my parents would pay for it. Graduate school was another thing, though, and since I'm at a private school I'll most likely have to pay my own way through grad school if I choose to go.

Honestly, I'd say a major goal of my parents' financial planning/savings was to save enough to pay for college for me and my sister.

Then again, there was never any doubt that we wouldn't take full advantage of the opportunities they would be giving us by paying for college.

Man....I'm totally undecided on this issue.
 
Posted by pooka (Member # 5003) on :
 
If only I could assert that character is more important than financial success.
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
quote:
While having to work hard to pay for your own education may be enlightening, or character-building, I don't think it necessarily means one will be more financially independent or financially successful in the future.
I think it's pretty safe to say that having someone else pay for something that costs thousands of dollars so you don't have to pay for it yourself can have a positive impact on future financial success. [Big Grin]

However, I've seen too many people run up huge debts their senior year and first 3-4 years out of college. Only slightly better are those who don't run up debt but wake up at 25 and realize they've done nothing to increase their net worth in the 4 years since college. (A fancy car does not contribute to the net worth equation.)

In finances, time = power. Those first 4 years are extremely valuable financially. Too few take advantage of it.

Obviously, a different analysis applies to those who've gone to grad school.

Dagonee
 
Posted by katharina (Member # 827) on :
 
quote:
I imagine that adding another 16 years will do quite a bit to clarify it for her, so that when she's ready for college, she'll know pretty well what will keep the gravy train rolling.
I think that's the thing, though. That's why it's so sticky when you are clearly an adult, yet still taking money from parents. My the time I was 20, I knew what would make my parents happy, and I also knew that it would make me very unhappy to do it. If you pay for your children's education, it's a gift to an adult. They shouldn't feel they need to make a choice between placating their parents and making choices.

I don't mean financial ones - I mean, if you pay for a semester of school and they never go, that's one thing. But what if...

What if they decide on a different religion? Or none at all? Or they date someone you deeply dissaprove of. Or major in something you don't think will help them. These are all decisions that have the potential to make you very unhappy, and if their ability to go to school is tied to those decisions, I don't think that's good.
 
Posted by Jeni (Member # 1454) on :
 
quote:
In finances, time = power. Those first 4 years are extremely valuable financially. Too few take advantage of it.
And any student who's been forced to pay for their own education with no assistance will be fighting a huge uphill battle for those four years.

There's simply no way a student can pay for college completely on their own without being financially screwed in the years after. The average cost of a four year public university including tuition, fees, room, board, and books is about $12,000 per year. You'd have to make $230 a week, which just isn't going to happen as a full time student.

I also don't buy the "they'll value their education more if they have to pay for it" argument. Either you're a responsible, hard working student or you're not, and I'd say those traits are developed long before you step on a college campus. I don't think it's any more character building to have to pay for every cent of your education alone versus, say, paying as much as is possible and getting a bit of help for the rest, either.
 
Posted by Coccinelle (Member # 5832) on :
 
this is an interesting thread.

the summer before I started college my dad's brother stole my father's entire inheritance that they had invested to pay for tuition for myself and my sister. This meant that I began school with no financial aid (I had a $500 scholarship to pay for books) and no money to pay tuition.

I'm now in more debt than I care to think about.I just make the monthly payments and tell my students that student loans are evil.

If parents can help, I think they should. I don't think I value my education any more than my younger sisters and brother (my mom started working to help them out) because I'm in debt for it.

My parent's did help me out the past couple of years by paying rent and car insurance which was truly lovely.

If you can help your child avoid being a starving student in debt, then by all means do so.
 
Posted by Fitz (Member # 4803) on :
 
I would have to argue with that, Jeni. I work 24 hours a week, at $10/hour. So that's $240/week right there. I'm also a full-time student, making good grades.

Apart from that, I agree with you completely.

My parents decided not to pay for my education, but I don't hold it against them. They let me live at home for free. They feed me. They let me use their car, and they even pay for the gas. Why? Because they can easily afford it. I still had to get a job just to pay the ridiculous tuition fees. So you can teach your kids that money doesn't grow on trees, and still help them out.

So I guess I'm on the side that says if a parent has the means to help their child, they should. Serioulsy, what kind of parent lets their children go into debt if it can be avoided?
 
Posted by Jeni (Member # 1454) on :
 
Well, you're lucky in being able to find a job that pays $10 an hour. I don't think most college students would be able to. Also, that's before taxes.
 
Posted by Fitz (Member # 4803) on :
 
Yeah, but it's a low income job, so the taxes I pay are pretty low. And what I do pay, I usually end up getting back in my annual tax refund.
 
Posted by David Bowles (Member # 1021) on :
 
I would have really benefitted from significant financial assistance during college. I wasn't too keen on taking out loans (though I eventually did), and working full time while trying to a degree is extremely challenging for a 19-year-old.
 
Posted by jeniwren (Member # 2002) on :
 
kat, as long as anyone takes money from anyone else for the purpose of basic living requirements, they are a dependent. It doesn't matter how old they are. And it isn't really a gift when it's a question of dependence. My mother has lived with me for years, dependent on my ability to pay for the roof over our heads and the food on our table. As such, she has been respectful of me and now my husband, since I re-married.

I don't dictate the finer points of her life. She chooses not to go to church. That's her business, and I don't interfere, though I would really like to sometimes. OTOH, she may not entertain boyfriends overnight either. (Not that that has come up, but I'm very clear about it.)

As I said before, I try not to be capricious with my children. And as I mentioned above, the whole paying for school and living expenses isn't really a gift. It's a series of choices. I choose to save money for their education. They can choose someday to avail themselves of that opportunity and remain dependant.

A little over five years ago, my father offered me the opportunity to go to school while he paid for the majority of my living expenses. I was still single then. I have long since learned that while my father is a very nice man, he can be capricious when it comes to finances. I didn't want to be dependent under those circumstances, and so declined the offer. His choice, my choice too.

I hope my children will feel differently about our offer -- that they will trust us to be fair just as we trust them to be responsible. I hope that I will have given them sufficient reason throughout their childhood to trust that we are reliable and loving while still understanding that we won't rescue them from bad choices.

Does that seem clear? I don't owe them anything more than love and basic needs. I WANT to give them so much more, but I won't do it if it will harm them -- their character development, their sense of responsibility, their ultimate ability to be happy and independant as an adult.
 
Posted by pH (Member # 1350) on :
 
I think it really depends on how you were raised and your family's specific values. As I said, my entire family on both sides, including extended relatives, view it as a parental obligation to support a child's education, no matter how far he/she decides to take it. That's just the way it is - "real world" things aside, education is considered one of the most valuable, important gifts to give a child, no matter the cost.

Even after my sister was thirty, my father was still offering to pay for her to go to law school, if she wanted to.
 
Posted by Shan (Member # 4550) on :
 
*Raises eyebrows in surprise*

I was allowed to take the pop cans in for the recycling refund, other than that I was on my own. The whole kit-n-kaboodle. All the way through.

An occasional meal. Tax-free manual labor jobs if there was nothing else available (I installed siding, did yard work, cleaned/repaired roofs and gutters, painted, washed windows, etc.)

Otherwise, living expenses and tuition and books and child care and all the other necesities of life were all mine.

In fact, my mom's answer to 18+ year old children coming home to live was to install them in the travel trailer in the backyard with no running water.

We were (and still are) a rather independent bunch.

[Big Grin]
 
Posted by PSI Teleport (Member # 5545) on :
 
quote:
But is there any way to tell them that I'm on my own financially? Of course not.
Aren't you married and living on your own?

When I filled out the Fafsa a couple of months ago there was the option of not claiming your parents income on there, if you were independent. Can't you do that?
 
Posted by Jeni (Member # 1454) on :
 
Actually, yeah, being married automatically allows to claim yourself as an independent on the Fafsa.
 
Posted by blacwolve (Member # 2972) on :
 
The way I feel about it is, I know I couldn't pay my way through college. I would not be able to keep up with the workload I would have to maintain and earn enough to go to the public university in my town (IU). This year tution plus room, board, and books is $16,000 and increasing by a lot each year. I would include allowing me to live at home without paying rent as supporting me through college, so I would have to pay the full $16,000.

I might be able to earn $6,00 a year if I worked and went to school. If I took out loans for the rest I would be in debt approx. $50,000 when I graduated. I wouldn't go to college under those circumstances, being in debt for the rest of my life isn't worth it. Maybe that means I don't deserve to go to college, but if my parents can pay for part of my college education with little long term financial effects to themselves, and I can't go to college without lifelong financial effects to myself, I don't think asking my parents to help is unreasonable.

I don't want my parents to pay all $40,00 a year if I go to a private school, though. WE already have agreed how much they are willing to pay for my schooling. I want to go to Cornell, if Cornell doesn't provide me with financial aid to match what my parents are paying, or if most of the financial aid they offer is in loans, I'm going to have to make the decision whether or not that debt is worth it to me.
 
Posted by ReikoDemosthenes (Member # 6218) on :
 
personally I feel that one should pay for their first year on their own...after that they should continue to work and save money for it at the very least, even if someone is willing to pay it for them...what I don't think is a good idea is getting it handed to you...I've seen a couple of people who got free post secondary education just walk away from it because they got bored with it...I doubt they would do that quite so easily if they had to earn some of the money...plus quite often taking a year off between highschool and post-secondary gives a person a chance to see life outside of school and mature some more in a different way than they would in school...if a parent can help with the funds, I think it is a good thing, but they shouldn't just cover all the funds...a good thing that my parents are doing for me is letting me live at home for free so long as I'm in school or gathering money for school (or job hunting as I had to do for the past age until I managed to get temp work the other day)...while maybe some people are able to go to post-secondary paid for by someone else and do well, I am glad that I've taken this year off to earn money for myself as I know that the only way I'm able to get there is by myself...
 
Posted by BYuCnslr (Member # 1857) on :
 
Unless you have had copious amounts of money put away, it is near impossible to pay for your first year of schooling by yourself. In my case, I had money put away...in 2000 I had around $5,000 in mutual funds and money markets, by 2003 because of the recession and other factors, my total finances had dropped to $3,500. My first year's tuition after financial aid (including a $5000 loan from the college) was still around $5,000. Not wanting to spend my own cash in case of emergency, I immediatly put most of what I had into CDs and a 6 month Treasury bond (for the minimum of two cycles, or one year). Because I never got a licences till my senior summer, and I never had a car until the second trimester, I couldn't get a job (I live on a farm, no transportation anywhere without a car). I was lucky in which I didn't have to buy my car, it was, in essence a loan from my great aunt who bought a new car, now that I am in college it has been sold. I had to pay for my insurance because my father couldn't afford it, that's about $600 every half year. Now, once I had a car to use, theoretically I could have had a car, but because I live on a farm, I have all the chores that go with it, between farm work and school, I didn't have much of a social life anyways, finding time for a job was close to impossible.

When it comes to the question of whether or not parents should pay for their child's education. I'd say if they're able to, then they should at least help. (Excuse me as I rant, if you don't want to hear it, go to the next paragraph). My father is near bankrupt, and is mostly unable to help with my college expenses, but my mother is rather wealthy...yet she doesn't do much for my education, she had promised me $10,000 for my first year of college, I have only seen roughly $4,000 of that...most of which has gone to living expenses and textbooks, I didn't even buy the student insurance that my college provides. She says that she's been hit by the recession, and yet I see her still happily driving her Lexus, something doesn't seem right here. My mother has gone so far as to say that if I asked her for any more money that she wouldn't give me any more money unless I moved back to Washington to go to University of Washington, if I had less tact, I would have pointed out that she still owes me $6,000 from what she promised and brought up all the jewelry her father took from my inheretence, of course, she being my mother, I just prompltly pointed out that tuition that I would be paying at UW is roughly $2,000 higher per semester than what I pay here.

With these thoughts in mind, I would say that it is the duty of a parent to support their children (financially or otherwise) to the best of their ability if the children are going to work hard for their education, after all it is the parents' to raise their children to the best of their ability. By no means should the parents pay for everything, the student should have responsibilty in their own education, but if a college student spends all his/her time working, when is s/he supposed to study or socialize?
Satyagraha

[ February 21, 2004, 03:56 AM: Message edited by: BYuCnslr ]
 
Posted by ReikoDemosthenes (Member # 6218) on :
 
er...I had no money in september when I started working, I now have enough money for a full year and am saving for a computer...if I hadn't been laid off shortly before Christmas I'd be able to make enough money for at least two years of school if not three...and this is working at just over minimum wage most of the time...all I did was save nearly everything except for tithe and a small allowance...as for a social life while working, I didn't have one due to my hours I was always either working or sleeping because I'd be so tired...but a social life is peripheral...

[ February 21, 2004, 04:02 AM: Message edited by: ReikoDemosthenes ]
 
Posted by BYuCnslr (Member # 1857) on :
 
My total tuition + room/board is $28,860. The college gives me $16,000 in grants, two $3,500 loans that don't have to be paid off until I finish. That leaves me roughly $5,000 that I have to pay out of pocket plus books, which this year has added to about $800, consider yourself lucky that you can go and get a job, I don't have that luxury. I don't mean this in a bad way, I'm saying all the power to you, I think it's awesome that you're able to do that...just not all of us are.
Satyagraha

[ February 21, 2004, 04:04 AM: Message edited by: BYuCnslr ]
 
Posted by ReikoDemosthenes (Member # 6218) on :
 
ah...my total tuition is 3000 to 4000, but that is because I chose to go to the least expensive place I could get into for now
 
Posted by butterfly (Member # 5898) on :
 
my tuition is around $38,000 since i attend a private school. even though i tell myself that i want to be independent, a part of me knows that i would never be able to pay tuition on my own, even though the majority is composed of loans and grants. right now, i just try to work as much as i am able to without influencing how i do in my classes. although my parents don't ask me for that money, as many of my friends work and pay at least a portion of their tuition, i still feel better that while my parents are paying so much for tuition, that i am contributing in the sense that i can cover the smaller fees, like books, going out with my friends, etc.
 
Posted by imogen (Member # 5485) on :
 
Things are a little different over here: we have a system called HECS, which is a deferred payment system. Basically, I pay nothing now, but by the time I finish my degree I will owe the government about $40 000.

It would be more (that's the total for 5 years, two degrees) but my parents paid my first two years upfront. (Under our system, if you pay upfront, you get a 25% discount: the rationale is people who can afford to pay will, but those who could not otherwise afford to go to university don't pay upfront - HECS doesn't have to be refunded until you are earning $45 000 per/year, and it is automatically taken out in installments, before tax).

I am extremely thankful they did so - I cannot work enough now to pay my fees upfront. This year, I will be lucky to make $180 a week - 6 hours of tutoring is all I can fit in along with final year law and honours.

Tony and I plan on doing what his family did: saving up and paying for my children's first degrees. If they want another degree after that they can work, or use HECS. I think it's the best of both worlds - doesn't put your kids in debt at 17, but also encourages them to think about what they want to do.
 
Posted by AvidReader (Member # 6007) on :
 
quote:
BUT I also think that good money management should be taught long before entering college, so that at that point it wouldn't even be an issue.
quote:
Amen! I touched on this in the bankruptcy thread - the consumer credit crisis is going to blow up in all our faces soon.
The saddest thing is seeing a college student come into the bank unable to understand how they've wracked up hundreds of dollars in NSF fees. The first question we ask is "Can I see your checkbook register?" ninety-nine times out of a hundred, the response is "I don't keep one."

Some debt is unavoidable. But I can't see how anyone can reasonable justify $6,000 at 18 to 24%on their credit card when they don't even have a job yet. I'd love to see courses in responsible financial planning start in elementary school.

(edited for bad point and click skills.)

[ February 21, 2004, 09:42 AM: Message edited by: AvidReader ]
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
quote:
And any student who's been forced to pay for their own education with no assistance will be fighting a huge uphill battle for those four years.
I was referring to the first 4 years after undergraduate school. A person can maintain a much more comfortable lifestyle than they did in college and still sock away a lot of money once a fulltime job starts. That socking away can be either bulding a savings account or paying off student loans, which does increase net worth.

quote:
There's simply no way a student can pay for college completely on their own without being financially screwed in the years after. The average cost of a four year public university including tuition, fees, room, board, and books is about $12,000 per year. You'd have to make $230 a week, which just isn't going to happen as a full time student.
Education debt is not bad debt - its up to the student to decide if the money spent is worth the benefits received.

Another possibility overlooked by many is community college. In Virginia, anyone with a certain GPA and a 2-year degree from a community college is automatically admitted to any state school. Two years of near-minimal tuition and then the pick of a very good state university system is not a bad deal. And you still have the more "prestigious" degree after 4 years.

Dagonee
 
Posted by ludosti (Member # 1772) on :
 
Growing up, my parents didn't have much money. That fact, combined with my own independant nature meant that I tried very hard to be as financially responsible and independant from my parents as possible. I knew that they could not afford to pay for me to go to college, nor did I think that they should. As I see it, a college education is a privalege, not a right. So, I worked hard in high school so that I could get a scholarship. I also started working part-time and during the summer when I was 16. Working part-time allowed me to buy my own car and keep it maintained (I've always bought old clunkers and worked on them to keep them going). My parents paid for my car insurance on their policy, which I thought was very nice of them. In AZ (at least at the time that I graduated almost 10 years ago), students who graduated in the top 5% of their class could have a tuition scholarship to any of the 3 state universities. I chose to attend ASU (where my father also works) and live at home. My parents made it clear that they would be pleased to have me live with them as long as I wanted to and, since I was in school, they wouldn't charge me rent. They also continued to pay for my auto insurance for me (and half the time, I shared my car with my father). I continued to work, saving the money I knew I would need to serve a mission, since I didn't think it was my parents responsibility to pay for it either. I also worked hard in college, so that I could keep my scholarship (it could be renewed yearly for up to 4 years, based on credit and grade requirements). I was able to graduate with my Bachelor's in 4 years (something that is becoming increasingly difficult to do) and had saved enough money for my mission.

I think that teenagers have the primary responsibility to provide for their college eduation. Where possible, parents that have the financial means to help should (but I don't ever think that college should be a free ride for their children). I remember being appalled at some of my classmates in college. One in particular was in her 5th year at ASU (on her parent's dime) and had yet to even declare a major! I guess some people don't mind their parents paying for their lives for them, but that idea really bothers me. [Dont Know]
 
Posted by blacwolve (Member # 2972) on :
 
Letting you live at home without rent is helping pay for college. Tution at IU this year is $6000, room, board and books are $10,000. At almost any public university you go to (and there are some really good ones out there) room and board is going to be the largest expense. Even at private schools room and board are a significant part of your total expenses.

Personally, I feel that when two people deide to have a child they make a commitment to that child to support them and love them for the rest of their lives and to help provide for them as much as they are able. I think helping provide an education for their children that will allow them to maintain themselves in relative comfort is included in that. I don't think there is any excuse for parents who are financially capable to refuse to provide for their children's future as best they can.
 
Posted by mackillian (Member # 586) on :
 
quote:
I was referring to the first 4 years after undergraduate school. A person can maintain a much more comfortable lifestyle than they did in college and still sock away a lot of money once a fulltime job starts. That socking away can be either bulding a savings account or paying off student loans, which does increase net worth.
I'm not socking away any money and I "paid" for undergraduate college on my own through grants, scholarships and loans. I graduated $30,000 in educational debt (not credit card debt). I'm a bachelor's level social worker and with the 2% cost of living raise, I now make $25,000 a year. I have medical expenses each much totaling about $200. Rent is $600. Utilities $100. Car payment because the $500 89 chevy celebrity that got me through college lost the transmission with my high commute first fulltime job out of undergrad. I work outreach now (and commute as well, but way less) so I have to have a decent, reliable car. For someone with my debt, financing was easier on a new car than an old car. Figure that. [Dont Know]

I'm working my ass off. My first job I worked 60-70 hours a week. At one point I worked two jobs and barely made ends meet, much less could sock away a lot of money to immediately pay off my student loans. Now I work a salaried position that makes a bit more money but keeps me just above water. Barely. If anything bad happened, I'd be screwed.

So now I'm working fulltime in an intense job in a human service field. At the same time, I'm in a fulltime MSW program so that once I get my MSW, I'll get a decent salary (we're talking low to mid thirties starting out). Considering I make $25,000/year now (before taxes), that's a gigantic raise.

I mean, I JUST got a grownup bed. I've had my apartment for two years and had the same twin bed I'd had since I was 11.

You see, I did this all on my own. Got into school, went to school, worked while in school, found residential jobs in the summer because I didn't live with my parents, graduated, found my first apartment and full time job and got my first good car. Yes, school was a huge investment and I consider it completely worth it. It wasn't just the academics that helped me--I think it was the human interaction and things that happened there that really made me who I am now.

Thing is, I've really figured out recently that I'd love to get my PhD. Except unless I got a full ride, I could never afford that. If I'd gotten help from my parents in undergrad, I might've been able to.

But I'll figure out a way. I always have.

My parents actually tried to stop me from going to college. But I have that problem with authority. [Wink]
 
Posted by pooka (Member # 5003) on :
 
I'm only paying for colleges where they teach you to use capitalization and paragraph breaks. [Wink] Just a little hazing for you, but also a warning that I tend to skim posts that are hard to decode. edit: "you" is not mack.

My brother in law got a lot of grants (no payback) by getting emancipated or something. I don't know if the fact that he was adopted made it easier, or weirder, or whatever. But if your parents are not supporting you financially, or can't, I don't think it is weird to be emancipated from them.

Also, you can get deferrments on loan repayment for several years through either the unemployment deferment and the hardship deferment. Not sure if it is worth having unemployment and hardship to make this happen, but in terms of the first few years out of school...

Finally, at our state schools all state employees (maybe only the full time ones) qualify for cheap or free tuition. So getting a state job of some kind, even a really cruddy one, is a possible route to funding education. I don't think they are all necessarily more cruddy than your average job.

[ February 22, 2004, 01:27 AM: Message edited by: pooka ]
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
Mac,

Believe it or not, there are people in your position who would not have waited to get the grown-up bed. They would also have bought a new car (nicer than the one you did) because they felt entitled to it. They might have gotten one without the bullseye on it, though [Wink] .

Assuming you're paying off your college loan, you are socking money away, because that debt shows up on a balance sheet to offset any savings you have. In other words, when you're 30 your financial habits now will have had a positive effect on your financial health. It sounds like your economizing where necessary and spending wisely - all I was getting at is that many people coming out of college don't do these things well, if at all.

Dagonee
 
Posted by Alice (Member # 6083) on :
 
I love that people who think $50,000 of debt is rediculous to assume have no problem asking thier parents to assume it for them.

I don't think that anyone deserves to go to college. Whether or not your parents pay for it is completely up to them. If they do offer to pay for it, you should accept the terms or not take the money. I would hope that the terms would be reasonable, like kat's parents', but it's their money, they can set whatever they want.

Like any aspect of parenting, there should be a clearly defined set of rules and consequences. If one of those rules is "go to the church I tell you to" that may not sound fair, but you're taking their money.

Have they changed FAFSA? When I was applying it was really difficult to claim yourself as an independent.
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
It's STILL really difficult. When Christy and I became serious, her dad cut her off completely -- and without any warning -- which left us scrambling to find a way to fund her education. It was especially frustrating because her dad's income was still considered HER income for the purposes of aid, despite the fact that he had no intention whatsoever of sending her anything.
 
Posted by Banna_Oj (Member # 6207) on :
 
Note to self, post more tomorrow.

In my family it was *expected* that we go to college.

However I also saw any money coming from my parents as having huge strings attached. Fortunately I was a National Merit Scholar and was able to go to a state school for free and actually get a stipend.

My parents paid less having me in college than they did having me live at home. The total sum of their expenditures was my car insurance, and about $200 in groceries at the beginning of each semester. They also may have paid for about $1000 in health care costs.

Now I always heard my mother complain about making ends meet growing up. I *thought* my family was poor and barely scraping by. In reality they were doing just fine and putting lots into savings. When I got a job so that I didn't ever have to ask my mother for spending money, my parents had a hissy. In hindsight again, it had everything to do with them wanting to maintain control and keep me dependent and nothing actually to do with finances.

I didn't really want my parents to contribute anything to my college education that gave them leverage over my decision making.

I fully intended, if I didn't get any scholarships, on getting a job and only going to school part time if that was all I could afford. I'm an extremely big proponent of community colleges as well and I attended one.

I think if a parent is willing to contribute because they value education it is one thing, when there are strings it is an entirely different ball of wax.

I also believe that education is a priveledge not a right.

AJ
 
Posted by Shan (Member # 4550) on :
 
Well, my parents (Father and stepmother) not only refused to contribute (mack - are you my twin?) they also shot down the whole idea of a BA - in anything. Unless it was something they chose. But no money to help, period. Whether I did what they wanted me to or not. AND, they got pissed off when I got my taxes in before they did as an independent filer. I figured I had supported my own self for the previous year, I was over 19 and I was entitled to claim myself.

I did like mack did - worked my butt off and used a combination of work study, scholarships, loans. No job was too little or awful. No matter who for - as long as they paid me.

It wasn't uncommon for me to work three different part-time jobs while still maintaining a 3.8 GPA AND (most importantly - when I returned to college to finish my degree) raising a child with a lot of special needs.

So, it can be done - and I don't think ANYONE is obligated to put anyone else through college, nor buy them a vehicle, nor pay for any other little bit of it once they hit legal age of responsibility (18, no?) and are competent to care for themselves.

Quite frankly, it was the students who were sacrificing and scraping to get by, that made the best and most conscientious students. The ones that were there on mom and dad's dime really didn't seem to give a rat's a** - and I attended both public and private colleges. Back east and in the west. And observed the same attitude and lack of concern - pretty appalling. (To me)

I don't know - my father was raised on a teensy tiny farm in Wyoming. They had clothes, food and a home. They had an education. They had (most importantly) each other. They worked hard. His day started and ended with farm chores. The bus stop really was a few miles away (and try walking in 60 below zero - it isn't a lot of fun) and expectations for homework and class performance were very high (drama in those days consisted of Greek tragedies, not musicals) and the students designed and built the sets and costumes.

Oh well - I'll stop. This is beginning to sound like the old crank of "we walked uphill in freezing rain both ways" kind of stories -

but I think it's important to note that the last few generations have had it EASY! We don't have to actually grow and process the grain that makes our bread. We don't actually have to plant, cultivate and harvet the food we eat. We don't have to shear the sheep and prepare the wool and then sew our own clothes. In addition to such mundane items as going to school and doing well.

Quite frankly - with all the advantages we have, I'd expect that our country would top the list of success stories in education, poverty, health care, etc.

Something's not right.

*shakes head in dismay and wanders off, leaving the can open so the worms acan crawl in and out*
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
Mac's post brings up something that I think a lot of young people (not likely the types of brilliant folks posting on hatrack, but other young people) seem to have a real problem with: delayed gratification.

I post that as I sit here with a laptop that is propped up with pillows because the hinge is broken and the screen won't stay up. I say that as I look up at my television in a $120 pressboard entertainment center we put together ourselves back when we lived in our old 2 bedroom house. We've been talking about getting some nice cherry finish furniture like an entertainment armoire and bookshelves but six years after moving in the house we haven't goten them yet, because everytime we had the money it was needed somewhere else more important than new furniture.

I know people who would have bought a new laptop and new furniture (probably on one of those no interest, no payment for a year plans that balloon to 23% interest after your 12 months is up) and probably would be driving a van right now that didn't have 112,000 miles on it like mine does.

The amount of debt some people have would make me throw up. Heck, the amount of debt we have makes me want to throw up. I get sick when I think about it, how we racked up so much debt. Even though a lot of it wasn't our fault, in that we had to try and recover from a financial crisis caused by an employee that stole money from the business and didn't pay creditors, then hid the notices from them so it was several months in before my husband found out that the suppliers he assumed were current, were in fact way behind (and finance charges were tacked on, naturally). Long story, some of you know it. The last time all his accounts with his suppliers were current was the month before we hired this guy. That was 18 months ago. We've been trying to catch up since, and this month we should do it.

Now, back to topic - we are not putting away a lot for college right now. It is our intention however, to assist our kids by paying tuition and books. We will encourage them to save money for room and board and other expenses, when each one gets old enough they will be able to work summers and earn money. I don't want them working part time while they are in school (high school) because I want them focusing on their education.

Bottom line - we consider it our obligation as parents to give them the opportunity for a college education. But, with four children, we can't afford to send them all to private schools, especially considering we have three kids who will be in college at the same time! If they want to live at home and attend a public university, we will pay tuition and books. If they want to attend a private school or if they want to go to college away from home, then they'll have to provide some of the costs themselves, through scholarships or working.
 
Posted by Suneun (Member # 3247) on :
 
quote:
Bottom line - we consider it our obligation as parents to give them the opportunity for a college education.
I really quite agree with this statement. As I said before, if parents definitely have the extra cash, then this is how it should be spent. Parents who don't, can do what they can.

It's funny. My mother is an everything-for-your-children kind of person, raised in a culture that really believes in that, the sacrifice-everything-for-your-child. And I agree, even though I don't see myself having children. If I do have a child, I would definitely see it as an obligation to provide for their education to the best of my ability.
 
Posted by Bob the Lawyer (Member # 3278) on :
 
Reading this makes me count my lucky stars that I'm at the school with the best coop program on the planet. Sure, I get no time off a year and my degree takes me 5 years rather than 4, but I also come out with 2 years of quality work experience and will probably have turned a small profit over the 5 years it will have taken me to get my degree.
Coop at Waterloo has been the most intense love/hate relationship so far in my life.
 
Posted by Farmgirl (Member # 5567) on :
 
This is a real interesting thread -- and I think there is no universally right answer, since so many people and situations are so different.

In my family as well, it is just "understood" that you go to college. Everyone in our family has. In fact, with my Bachelor's degree, I'm the lowest degreed person in the family.

However, my kids also know that mom is poor -- single parent of three kids with no child support. So they have understood early on that if they want college it will be through their own achievements.

My oldest got the nearly full-tuition scholarship. I do help him pay for books -- but he helps me pay for household expenses. We kind of throw our money all into one pot. He has a part-time job. He does get help through FAFSA, and this DID limit his choice of colleges - obviously you go with whatever one offers you the best scholarship...

My second son plans to go to a trade school that is relatively inexpensive. (vo-tech).

My daughter will probably be the biggest worry financially, depending on what she can pull in scholarships. Becoming a vet is many more years and much expense. She is planning on getting a job this summer (she's 14) to start saving. She is very level-headed and I think will find a way to achieve her goals regardless of whether or not I can come up with the money for it.

Farmgirl
 
Posted by PSI Teleport (Member # 5545) on :
 
quote:
Well, my parents (Father and stepmother) not only refused to contribute (mack - are you my twin?) they also shot down the whole idea of a BA - in anything.
Refusal to contribute is refusing any rights they may have to decide what you study, IMO.
 
Posted by mackillian (Member # 586) on :
 
Duh. [Wink]
 
Posted by Shan (Member # 4550) on :
 
Yep.

Therefore, I studied music and sound engineering the first time around.

They hated it. [Big Grin]

But it was my dime. My time. And my life.

It did take about 10 years for me to become comfortable with my petty rebellions, I have to admit. [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Toretha (Member # 2233) on :
 
My parents told us how much they could afford to help us each year. After that, we are supposed to pay other expenses. I got a scholarship to pay all my tuition, so I only have books and living expenses. My sister wants to go out of state-but she's a national merit finalist, so she's got several full scholarships if she chooses to take them. Neither of us are planning on any debt whatsoever.

Then funny thing is that all the people at my father's work think mom and dad are horribly unparently for telling us that we have to move out during the school term, and can only live at home on holidays [Razz]
 
Posted by Theca (Member # 1629) on :
 
I think it is nice for parents to support their kids educational endeavors in some way. If that support is not financial in nature due to lower income, fine. Parents can only do what they can.

But I am still trying to wrap my brain around Suneun's suggestion that folks who are upper middle class ought to pay each child's 20000+ tuition. I don't really know what salary upper middle class folks have, I guess.

$80,000 minimum per child just seems...way, way too much to expect of one's parents. Unless they make a LOT of money. They need to be setting up their retirement and have lots of other bills to pay too. I don't agree that kids NEED to spend that much money for a college education, it's an option, sure. An option that if they really really want then they can help pay for it or take out loans for it. If they aren't willing to, then they can look into where they can get scholarships or look at state schools. How many people actually need to spend that much money to get a good education or to apply for grad school? I had a friend in medschool whose parents paid for her entire four years of out of state college tuition PLUS her medical school tuition plus her medschool credit cards and 1/2 her rent. She complained constantly about her lack of money and had no appreciation whatsoever about her parents' sacrifices. Now she makes more money then they do. Is she planning to pay them back at all? Nope. She expected them to help her so why should she pay it back, she says.

I know I didn't need to pick out an Ivy League school to get what I needed out of college. I got into medschool without any problems and frankly I am glad I chose the cheaper option. My parents had an agreed upon plan to give each child $1000 per semester for four years so long as we were enrolled. How far that money went depended on us. I lived at home, got scholarships, and basically paid maybe $200 tuition per semester max, plus books. I got free room and board ONLY because I was a fulltime student. Otherwise I would have had to pay rent. That was carefully explained to me before I graduated high school. In return I helped out around the house and drove my mom and brother around when they needed a lift. Oh, I did have 100% use of a family car but was mainly because my mom was blind and so my ability to take her and my brother to appointments and shopping and stuff and basically clear my dad's car for his use alone was helpful to the family. I do admit I might have been better off living in the dorm and making some friends rather than living at home and remaining practically friendless and very isolated during college. But that was my choice. And at the end of college I had enough money socked away to buy myself a nice new little car that lasted 10 years before I traded it in.

My dad is a college professor. His salary is at the very low end since he is not a phd. When my mom casually commented once that the only reason he worked every summer session was to pay for our college education it really hit me hard. Every day he went to work in the summertime instead of taking time off for his side interests was basically my fault. I had a very hard time dealing with that. How do other college kids who get monetary support NOT feel ashamed and humbled at least a little bit by their parents' sacrifices? Like my friend in medschool. It IS a big deal to most parents.

Of note, there were a lot of first generation Asians in medschool with me and we used to sit around and talk about parental support. They all told me Asian parents work their fingers to the bone, if necessary, to avoid taking out any loans. They weren't sure why. Suneun, do you think part of your opinion is cultural? Just curious.
 
Posted by GradStudent (Member # 5088) on :
 
The town I grew up in, everyone went to college. The best one they could get into. Which for many people was an expensive private school in the $30-40,000 range. And the parents all paid, from money that they had been saving up for the kid's entire life. If someone's parents had refused to pay for school, we would have been shocked. My parents wrote a check for my entire four year education at a private liberal arts college when I started college.

I think it might be a cultural thing. I come from a very Jewish town that considered educating your child a parental responsibility that did not end when they turned 18.

Don't know if that's right or wrong, just offering another experience.
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
To be honest, I've always considered that kind of giving to be excessive, and to border on "spoiling" a child.
 
Posted by Mrs.M (Member # 2943) on :
 
I consider it my parental duty to pay for my childrens' entire educations (at the schools of their choice, studying whatever they want), up through and including graduate school. Andrew does, as well.

Not only is it my duty, but it's my pleasure.

A good education is one of the greatest assets I can give my child. It is a necessity in today's job market and certainly will be when my (future) children enter the job market.

As to private schools versus public... I went to a prestigious private school and got an excellent education. Do I think that you can get an excellent education at a public school? Absolutely. Andrew went to public schools for undergrad, law, and graduate schools and he is frighteningly well-educated (even over-educated [Wink] ). However, having an Ivy League school on my resume opens doors for me. I have never been turned down for a job or even had a job search last for more than 2 weeks. It's a lifelong free pass to the front of the line. I'll probably encourage my children to go to a private school so that they can have the same opportunities in their professional lives that I have had in mine.

Maybe it is a Jewish cultural thing, because I have never heard of a Jewish family not paying (or trying as hard as they could to pay) for their childrens' educations.
 
Posted by PSI Teleport (Member # 5545) on :
 
Earlier in the thread I said that it's good for parents to pay for as much of their kid's education as possible, but shouldn't be mandatory...just a nice guesture (sp?).

Since then Jesse and I have spoken about it and we came up with a good compromise which will serve as our plan for now. We plan to pay for the child's first year, and allow them our home to stay if they choose as long as they are still attending. That would give them time to get adjusted to school life, get a job to help and do their best to get in a good position to get financial aid, if possible. After the first year, the only support they will receive is room and board, and the rest of the expense is up to them. (I say this because in many places it's not that hard to get paid education. In Georgia, if you maintain a B average they will pay for you to go to most of the schools in that state.)

This is obviously up for revision because I'm sure nothing will work out as neatly as we plan. For example, if one of our kids is taking a difficult major, and is getting good grades, but isn't making enough to pay for all their tuition, or can't work full time AND maintain their grades, there could probably be some more give on our side.

I consider college years a very important time in a person's life, where they should be able to make adult decisions, but still, their main resposibilities should be getting an education and having a chance to solidify their skills in most areas that concern adults (I said MOST [Wink] ) such as money management, etc.

I am open to anything our kids want to study, and if they choose not to attend college, we'll decide at that time how to handle the money we saved for their first year. (Maybe a wedding gift, investment, business capital or some other way...but I probably won't hand it over in cash.)
 
Posted by Suneun (Member # 3247) on :
 
I do think it's largely cultural. That, stereotypically, Asian and Jewish cultures both support completely paying for the child's education. But I don't think it's a bad idea.

Again, I don't think it's necessary for the parent to go into debt to help the child pay for college. I'm somewhat circuitously defining upper-middle class as the kind of people who have the money to pay for a private college tuition with no loans.
 
Posted by BannaOj (Member # 3206) on :
 
Just curious, is there a typical number of children in Asian and Jewish families?

Steve's parents viewed college education as important but they were both teachers. They wanted him to go to college, but fully expected him to take out loans to pay for it just like they did.

He got a tuition waiver for his schooling and is only about 20K in debt after 5 years of engineering school.

I did take out a $10K loan when I got to grad school, mainly because I was tired of scrimping every penny and worrying about paying the bills. Once you make it to grad school they stop looking at your parents income information. The amount that the FAFSA expected my parents to contribute before that point was horrendous, nearly 1/3 of my father's income and I didn't qualify for loans. They really don't take into acount any other dependents at home that will be going in to college in the near future in their equations.

I would have felt extremely guilty making my parents pay that much, even though they saved quite a bit in order to pay for our college educations. If I had truly wanted to go to an Ivy League school and not gotten a scholarship, they would have found a way to have me go, but it would have involved likely taking out a second mortgage on the house.

Also to my knowledge college loan debt is not viewed as "bad" debt on your credit report. It may contribute to some of the aggregate scores but most of the places who give loans understand that the payments are low etc and that the interest is a tax write-off. The only thing that makes college debt bad, is if you default on you loans and that is really, really bad.

I do think that many college students who have mommy and daddy pay for everything have money managment and delayed gratification issues.

A good friend of mine is Bengali. All of her apartment bills were sent to her father instead of her. When she actually got a job and lived in an apartment on her own, she was totally overwhelmed by the routine of paying utility bills that I didn't even blink twice at. I literally talked her through bill paying a couple times before she got the hang of it. To me that isn't preparing your child for the future whatsoever. (This particular friend didn't have delayed gratification issues but I know others who did.)

On delayed gratification I'm of the mind if you want your fun now, know that you are going to pay for it in the long run. I didn't mind when Steve bought his Eclipse Spyder GTS. In hindsight, I suspect I had a better idea of what chunk the monthly car payment was going to take out of our finances than he did. But I knew we could afford it at the same time. I still don't regret that we bought that car. It would have been nice if we could have bought the identical used car that the dealers had on their lot, but because we were fresh out of college with NO credit it was easier to qualify for new car financing than used car financing. (We then refinanced down to a low interest rate after their 0% interest grace periond was over.)

I have made him promise that he will keep it for at least one year (though I'd prefer more) after the loan is paid off, so that we can put the money into savings that otherwise would have gone to car payments.

On the other hand delayed gratification is so beaten in to me, that I (until recently) never bought clothes for myself unless my blue jeans were disintegrating from use. And so Steve and some jatraqueros have had to undertake an intervention, that I never would have really thought about on my own.

AJ
 
Posted by Suneun (Member # 3247) on :
 
From personal experience, i think korean families generally run 2-4 in the US. I guess I could look up statss.....
 
Posted by katharina (Member # 827) on :
 
I do wish my family felt some sort of impetus to help with grad school, even if it was only covering things like plane tickets home and health insurance. I asked my dad once, when I was nearing graduation from college, and he said, quote, "Katie, I am not the de Medicis."

Great. Blunt, insightful, funny, and educated. And coming from someone whose parents' big present for college graduation was loaning him the money for the plane ticket to Houston, to start his first job.
 
Posted by BannaOj (Member # 3206) on :
 
My family had three children. If each of us had cost 45K for school that would be over $130K to get all three children through college. Considering that this is probably half of the value of their house I think it would be excessive to actually spend that much. Yes one kid might need more financial help than another. Right now both of my brothers work summer jobs beach lifeguarding that pay very well.

However I actually had to tell the one, that is the L.A. County Lifeguard that he shouldn't take the job with the most income this summer, but should apply for engineering internships instead, since those will be far more valuable in his future career. I told him this, expecting that my parents will probably have to make up the difference in subsidizing his schooling, even though they never had to do something like that for me.

I went to school in an area with a much lower cost of living which made a huge difference.

AJ
 
Posted by BannaOj (Member # 3206) on :
 
I also think I had more incentive to be independent compared to my brothers, because of all the strings that they attached to my behavior that haven't been attached to my brothers behaviors.

The last year my parents claimed me as a dependent they had to do a bit of "fancy math" to actually justify that I was a dependent, since they really didn't contribute half of my expenses, which was the government criteria for a dependent. They were actually making money on me the last couple of years as far as the tax break they got vs. the amount they actually contributed to my expenses. They were a little miffed when I said I was claiming myself independent the year after.

AJ
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
quote:
That, stereotypically, Asian and Jewish cultures both support completely paying for the child's education.
I don't think that's been true in the Jewish community for at least a generation. [Dont Know]

quote:
I'm somewhat circuitously defining upper-middle class as the kind of people who have the money to pay for a private college tuition with no loans.
What about the fact that the parents are "borrowing against" their future?

I got help from my parents, but never expected them to pay for college. Same for my brothers.
 
Posted by katharina (Member # 827) on :
 
quote:
because of all the strings that they attached to my behavior that haven't been attached to my brothers behaviors.
*scowl* That would make me upset. My best friend's family did this as well.

[ February 24, 2004, 02:36 PM: Message edited by: katharina ]
 
Posted by jeniwren (Member # 2002) on :
 
Theca, I really liked reading what you wrote. That describes clearly how I feel about paying for my children's education, but you said it so much better.

Amusingly enough, my 10 year old son brought this up while I was driving him to school this morning. He asked me how long I thought he should live with us in our house. I told him that after he graduates high school, he'll need to have made some decisions about that -- go to college, or get a job. Because once he graduates high school, it will either be full time study or pay market value room and board. He was surprised to hear that he didn't *have* to go to college. It was a fun conversation...one I look forward to having with him more as he gets older. He just gets more and more interesting as he gets older. *fond mommy smile*
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
There are 6 siblings in my family. My eldest sister graduated with a bachelor's in 1988; my brother graduates in May. The three oldest were all in college for one year; for most of the time there were at least two.

There's no way my parents could pay for all our expenses for college, even with us all going to state schools (which are VERY good in Virginia). However, they helped a lot and even helped pay off loans for my younger sister when she became a teacher.

I worked every break (Winter, Spring, Summer), took no vacations, and spent very little in college. I saved every single penny I made for living expenses in college and/or tuition. I usually paid Fall tuition, rent, and other living expenses and Spring rent and living expenses.

But I managed to graduate with little debt. I could not have started my business if I had been carrying any more debt, since I had no discretionary income for the first two years or so.

I do remember my oldest sister once saying that if my parents hadn't had more than two kids, they could have paid her way through school and she wouldn't have had to work so hard.

Being the third child you can imagine how I felt.

Dagonee
P.S., fortunately, I am paying for law school with no debt and will be able to establish college funds for my children before they're born. And I'm happy to do so. [Smile] See - happy.

[ February 24, 2004, 02:43 PM: Message edited by: Dagonee ]
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
"I'm somewhat circuitously defining upper-middle class as the kind of people who have the money to pay for a private college tuition with no loans."

This would in fact be my definition of "rich," since the average private school now costs around $20,000 a year.
 
Posted by GradStudent (Member # 5088) on :
 
I think Jewish families vary a lot in size. I know ones as large as 12, and same with 0 or 1 kids.

Again, I think my parents felt like paying for my education was a good investment, and something they felt morally obliged to do. I have a sister and all of our schooling probably cost them close to $400,000. (About $10-$12,000 a year for grade school, and about $30-40,000 for college.) So a whole lot of money.

Now I am in grad school, and I pay my own expenses, 100% (with the help of a fellowship).
 


Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2