posted
OK fine, I'll promise number 4, but I don't promise that my defention of "socially-acceptable minimum" is the same as anyone else's. Not that it's necessarily higher, just saying I can't promise it's the same.
posted
You know, I think the phrasing of that may need some reworking. By "socially acceptable minimum", I think "cold and distant." Maybe instead, it should be socially acceptable level? Yes that was completely unnecessary of me to say, since everyone understands what you meant, but hey, I felt like saying it. Posts: 609 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
ok, Maybe I'm just dense, but keep what to a socially acceptable level? The picture is of them sitting next to eachother, so what are you keeping in check? Picture takeing? Being next to each other? Sitting? Being Annie and Hobbes? Any of those seem pretty acceptable at almost any level, though at too much sitting may just be obsene. Posts: 2332 | Registered: Jul 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Kama-Con Rule #482. Kama is not really a computer program, so any attempts at debugging her will be seen as highly innapropriate.
Posts: 11895 | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
I thought it was the socially acceptable minimum of depictions of chubby kids hugging Jesus. (Sorry if that's your dorm.) Edit: so the kid's not chubby. Sorry.
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Kiss]](graemlins/kiss.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
![[Dont Know]](graemlins/dontknow.gif)
![[ROFL]](graemlins/rofl.gif)
![[Wave]](graemlins/wave.gif)
I'm just jealous.
