posted
After my neighbors woke me up for the second time around 4 am with their screaming fight, I decided there was no point going back to sleep. I decided to watch Blade Runner (Director's Cut) which I've heard about but never seen before.
The back of the tape makes a big deal out of the question of Deckard's humanity. Now, I got the whole "who's more human" theme watching it. But why was Deckard's humanity in question? A guy left him an origami unicorn and a couple folks asked him if he'd taken his own test. That's it?
Honestly, if I hadn't read the box, I never would have asked myself the question. I'm not sure that counts as a real quandry. How about you guys? Did you ask yourselves the question before anyone told you you should?
Posts: 2283 | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I read the book first and the question of Deckard's humanity was better dealt with in it I think. I'd have to reread it and rewatch the movie before I sort everything in my head enough to answer this.
Posts: 4519 | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
The answer is that it *is* subtle. Nothing is handed to you on a plate.
Everything is ambiguous and that is the delight, for me at least, of the plot.
Deckard is hunting and killing the Replicants, because they are not human, but his actions could be described as inhuman. Who is right and who is wrong? There is just no black and white. The additional hints that Deckard may or may not be a Replicant too makes this just more delicious.
But I'm an über-fan, so don't listen me
Posts: 892 | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Deckard's voice-over narration is cut from the Director's Cut. I think it spells out his human/replicant quandry better, IIRC. But lots of fans hate the voice-over. Personally, I can take or leave it--the VO, that is, Blade Runner is my favorite film. I so want the new version with the little briefcase. *sigh*
Posts: 6316 | Registered: Jun 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I guess if Deckard were a replicant, that would kind of be like the Sixth Sense. Or the other way around.
Posts: 11017 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
As for asking myself the question, my brother watched Blade Runner before I did, and just before I sat down to watch it he said to me, "this movie left me with a question. I won't tell you what that question is, but we'll see if you have the same one after you've seen it." After I'd watched it, he said, "so, what's the question?" I hesitated for a moment because I didn't really consciously think about it during the movie, but then I said, "Was Deckard a replicant?" and we discussed it for a while without either of us really deciding one way or another.
Posts: 1569 | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
The director believes that Decker is a replicant. I think the idea is absurd, on the grounds that no one would go to the trouble of building an alcoholic replicant without much combat ability in order to catch other replicants.
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yeah, it was never really much of an issue in the novel, but the movie and the novel aren't all that similar.
quote:Originally posted by TomDavidson: The director believes that Decker is a replicant. I think the idea is absurd, on the grounds that no one would go to the trouble of building an alcoholic replicant without much combat ability in order to catch other replicants.
And yet, somehow he was the best Blade Runner they had...
Posts: 1569 | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I think the idea is absurd, on the grounds that no one would go to the trouble of building an alcoholic replicant without much combat ability in order to catch other replicants.
Seriously. Particularly the lack of combat ability.
Posts: 3354 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Ok, it wasn't just me. That makes me happy.
The inhumanity of man theme was just about perfect, though. It wasn't a happy movie, but I think I liked it.
Posts: 2283 | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged |