posted
Two aspects of this I find troubling: 1) Non-criminal treatment of offenders and the consequent freedom from being listed as a sex offender. These folks get out of the military with no black mark in their public record? Nothing to put them on a sexual predator list in the new communities? Seems like there's a fundamental disconnect with how the rest of the country is viewing such offenders.
2) A sign in the women's shower advising them not to go anywhere (especially at night) without their "battle buddy." Does this remind anyone of the early days of rape crisis awareness on US college campuses? Tell the women to protect themselves somehow and hope the problem goes away?
Basically, there are some facts that should be brought out here:
1) What is the incidence of sexual assault in the US military? We don't know. Would like to think it must be MUCH lower than that in the general population because of the disciplined nature of the environment and the people. But we don't know that.
2) What are the effective means of combating the problem? Surely some commanders have addressed this in more effective ways than hanging signs in the women's latrines?
3) What are the circumstances leading to non-criminal handling of cases? It's often a tough crime to prove, of course, so are we simply looking at a pragmatic approach when the evidence is insufficient? Or is it indicative of a cultural bias of leniency and discounting the victim's statements? Given that they just went through a set of rule changes to make it easier for victims to report the crime, I suspect there's still at least SOME of the old cultural barriers around.
quote:Reported Cases Of Sexual Assault In Military Increase 1,700 Are Processed in '04 Amid New Policies
By Ann Scott Tyson Washington Post Staff Writer Saturday, May 7, 2005; Page A03
The number of reported sexual assaults in the military grew in 2004 and is expected to continue to rise next year as a result of new policies intended to remove barriers to victims coming forward, the Pentagon announced yesterday.
Military criminal organizations in 2004 received 1,700 reports of alleged cases of sexual assault, which includes rape, nonconsensual sodomy, indecent assault as well as attempts to commit those offenses.
In 1,275 of the reported cases, service members were alleged victims -- an increase of 25 percent over the number determined by a Pentagon task force in 2003, and 41 percent over the 2002 figure. The overall 2004 figure also included 425 cases in which service members allegedly assaulted or attempted to assault civilians -- a category not included in earlier years' totals.
Victim advocates said the increase could mean that incidents of sexual assault are actually rising in the military, as larger numbers of servicewomen are mobilized for today's conflicts, or that more victims are coming forward to report the assaults -- or a combination of both.
"Our concern is that sexual assault within the military continues to escalate," said Christine Hansen, executive director of the Miles Foundation Inc., a private, nonprofit organization that offers assistance to victims. At the same time, she said, "victims continue to be concerned about their privacy and confidentiality, as well as repercussions that they may face, either through charges of fraternization and adultery or drinking."
Both the Pentagon and victim advocates agree that barriers to reporting such offenses have been a persistent problem within the military. "Sexual assault is probably the most underreported crime," said Lt. Col. Joe Richard, a Pentagon spokesman.
However, Pentagon officials said they believe the increased numbers primarily reflect efforts to raise awareness and sensitivity toward the problem. "We believe that due to greater emphasis and focus, down through the chain of command, to encourage victims to come forward -- that may account in some measure for the numbers," Richard said. He added that "we expected to see a spike."
In January, the Defense Department put in place a sexual assault prevention and response policy that allows victims to receive medical care, legal information and other support without automatically triggering an investigation. Still, if the victim decides to pursue an investigation, information about the assault could be revealed during a court-martial, Hansen said.
The 2004 cases resulted in completed investigations of 1,362 alleged offenders, including 1,011 service members. An additional 468 cases are pending.
Punitive action was taken in 342 cases, including 113 courts-martial, 132 nonjudicial punishments -- such as reduction in rank or forfeiture of pay -- and 97 administrative actions and discharges. No punitive action was taken in 629 cases, either because the alleged offender was not found or because of insufficient evidence.
"Regrettably . . . the military continues to use nonjudicial punishment when a crime has been committed," Hansen said. "That may preclude that individual from being listed as a sexual offender." A court-martial in recent years took place in only about 2 or 3 percent of military sexual-assault cases, she said.
One of the most troubling aspects of the assault problem is the emergence of cases in which U.S. troops -- men as well as women -- are abused by other service members in hostile environments such as Iraq and Afghanistan. Reported sexual assaults have risen in the Central Command region, which includes the Middle East and Central Asia, from 24 in 2002 and 94 in 2003 to 123 in 2004, according to figures the Miles Foundation obtained from the Pentagon's Joint Task Force on Sexual Assault Prevention and Response.
In many U.S. military camps in Iraq, for example, signs are posted in female showers and other locations requiring U.S. servicewomen to be in the company of a "battle buddy," especially at night, for their safety.
posted
Hmmmm. Not exactly all true (as far as service wide).
The Navy has a policy in which they go to NJP, but they are also listed as sex offenders. These members also get processed out of the navy. That comes after the forfieture of half months pay for 2 months, the 45 - 60 days restriction, 45 - 60 days extra duty, and could also include a few days bread and water in the brig.
Posts: 2208 | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Actually, I think naval forces have been dealing with the sex issue a lot longer than the other services -- back into history and naval tradition predating America.
It stands to reason they'd have a better handle on it, come to think of it.
Posts: 22497 | Registered: Sep 2000
| IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic
