posted
I'll sue! It's the right of hug junkies to hug who they want, whether they want to be hugged or not. This is in clear violation of their first amendment rights. (You knew someone was going to say it ) Oh, and can I get on that list?
Weren't you one of the ones who didn't see the value in e-hugs? So this is just to be contrary? Or have you had a change of heart?
[whisper] Oh, and thanks. I couldn't do that (I said I wouldn't, after all), but I so wanted to! [/whisper]
Posts: 32919 | Registered: Mar 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
BECAUSE I don't see the value of E-hugs, neither do I see the harm in them. I'm truly a sociopathic E-hugger.
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999
| IP: Logged |
posted
Tom...you kill me. On controversial threads, where I don't see your posts, I KNOW you're out there...lurking. I KNOW you have an opinion and that you'll choose the perfect way to voice it. You never fail and it always makes me smile. HA!! That was great. Pat should have known that he was just setting himself up to be hugged.
Posts: 6415 | Registered: Jul 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
Most of never get into a situation where we feel the need to assure people that we have not registered a nick as most of us have fewer that 500 nicks.
Posts: 1458 | Registered: Feb 2001
| IP: Logged |