I don't know about you, but I'm bothered by this.
Posted by CRash (Member # 7754) on :
quote:Originally posted by govexec.com "OSC helped my buddy out when he couldn't get his job back..."
That part doesn't bother me so much.
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
It's true, OSC can be magnanimous.
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
Did anyone have to read that title 5 times to get the meaning straight? Talk about bad syntax.
Posted by Sean Monahan (Member # 9334) on :
quote:Originally posted by Orincoro: Did anyone have to read that title 5 times to get the meaning straight? Talk about bad syntax.
Agreed.
Posted by DDDaysh (Member # 9499) on :
lol.. this was refreshing.
Posted by LargeTuna (Member # 10512) on :
ummm. i've never even heard of the Office of Special Councel before (OSC) at first i was expecting this to be about Orson Scott Card that's the only thing that made it confusing for me
Posted by Xann. (Member # 11482) on :
I read the whole thing before i realise that they wern't talking about an aide to orson or something.
Posted by Jon Boy (Member # 4284) on :
I think I only had to read that title four times before it all fell into place. Syntactically it's perfectly well-formed, but in writing it's pretty hard to parse because the verb in the subordinate clause could be read as a noun, while one of the nouns could be read as a verb.
Posted by John A. (Member # 11669) on :
I, for one, am completely shocked by OSC's behavior on this issue.
Posted by Trent Destian (Member # 11653) on :
It's a darn shame is what it is. What will the children think of OSC now? A darn shame.
Posted by Pen Ohmsford (Member # 9783) on :
quote:Did anyone have to read that title 5 times to get the meaning straight? Talk about bad syntax.
Agreed, horrible writing. I even tried to find out if the site was British or American, but naturally I couldn't (it is too poorly written and organized).
Posted by Mr Bean (Member # 11691) on :
I am just upset the OSC doesn't like bad publicity. I mean, what's with that?