Hatrack River - The Official Web Site of Orson Scott Card | |
Print | Back |
I've noticed that the Peter character in "Ender's Game", and the one in
the "Shadow of the Hegemon" preview, he seems to have completely different
personalities. In Game, he appears to be cruel, to an almost unusual extent, while
in Hegemon, he does what he does to help Ender. I was wondering, is Peter just a
normal older brother who likes to beat the younger one down, as is common in so
many homes, and is portrayed in Hegemon, or is he abnormally cruel in his
approach to others, and is this how you were attempting to depict him in "Ender's
Game"?
OSC REPLIES: - September 20, 2000
Remember that the Peter we saw in "Ender's Game" was the Peter who
was conceived in the minds of his siblings. The Peter we see in "Shadow of the
Hegemon" is older and more in control of himself, and we see his point of view,
so that we get his self-justification for what he does. He puts the best spin on his
own actions.
Think of how Bill Clinton sees himself -- the longsuffering victim of the enemies
of his programs, rather than a self-indulgent liar who has bombed innocent people
just to keep his own misdeeds off the front page. If you saw Clinton only through
the eyes of, say, Peggy Noonan and Newt Gingrich, he would be evil personified;
if you saw him through his own eyes, you would see the way he is completely
justified in everything he does. Peter, like Clinton, conceives of himself as a
beneficent ruler who only hurts people when it's necessary to get things done. He
deceives himself about his own past misdeeds, giving himself credit for motives
he didn't actually have. And yet ... I think that, unlike Clinton, there are things
Peter wouldn't do in order to achieve his own advantage, and Peter clearly has
more self-control and innate wisdom than Clinton. By the end of the fourth
Shadow book, we'll have a pretty clear conception of what and who Peter Wiggin
is ... but remember, Ender's second book was "The Hegemon," which had that
same understanding of a man with a serious problem with ethics who nevertheless
ended up doing good for good reasons. Since I'm not a genius like Ender Wiggin
or a moral paragon like Valentine, Peter (and the real-world people who resemble
him) give me some hope for myself ...
QUESTION: